The baseline data from GLORIA-AF phase 2 demonstrate that in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients, NOAC have been highly adopted into practice, becoming more frequently prescribed than VKA in Europe and North America. Worldwide, however, a large proportion of patients remain undertreated, particularly in Asia and North America. (Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [GLORIA-AF]; NCT01468701).
REFLECT-HF demonstrates that there are some differences in evidence-based treatment decisions between the three main health services (HBC, OBC and GP) providing care for patients with HF in Germany. Advocating adherence to guideline recommendations and earlier adoption of these evidence-based treatments across all levels of care might further improve patient care.
Background: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) for patients with chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, plus a diuretic. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that OMT is less often prescribed in HF-REF patients (≤35%) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II symptoms compared with those with NYHA class III/IV symptoms. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational, multicenter survey of hospital-based cardiologists, office-based cardiologists, and general practitioners in Germany. For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and β-blockers, prescription rates were high and comparable between groups. However, prescription rates for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were lower compared with other guideline-recommended treatments. Multivariate analyses indicated that OMT prescription was reduced for older patients and increased for patients cared for by an office-based cardiologist. Conclusions: Given the high proportion of patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function but only minor symptoms, HF-REF appears to be underdiagnosed, and a higher proportion of patients than are currently recognized could potentially be candidates for OMT.
Background In contrast with the setting of acute myocardial infarction, there are limited data regarding the impact of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcomes in contemporary cohorts of patients with chronic coronary syndromes. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of diabetes according to geographical regions and ethnicity. Methods and results CLARIFY is an observational registry of patients with chronic coronary syndromes, enrolled across 45 countries in Europe, Asia, America, Middle East, Australia, and Africa in 2009–2010, and followed up yearly for 5 years. Chronic coronary syndromes were defined by ≥1 of the following criteria: prior myocardial infarction, evidence of coronary stenosis >50%, proven symptomatic myocardial ischaemia, or prior revascularization procedure. Among 32 694 patients, 9502 (29%) had diabetes, with a regional prevalence ranging from below 20% in Northern Europe to ∼60% in the Gulf countries. In a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, diabetes was associated with increased risks for the primary outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.28 (95% confidence interval 1.18, 1.39) and for all secondary outcomes (all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and coronary revascularization). Differences on outcomes according to geography and ethnicity were modest. Conclusion In patients with chronic coronary syndromes, diabetes is independently associated with mortality and cardiovascular events, including heart failure, which is not accounted by demographics, prior medical history, left ventricular ejection fraction, or use of secondary prevention medication. This is observed across multiple geographic regions and ethnicities, despite marked disparities in the prevalence of diabetes. ClinicalTrials identifier ISRCTN43070564
Keeping pre-transplant patients alive while waiting for a suitable donor is still a major challenge. New pharmacological agents which can provide improved hemodynamics are urgently needed in patients with severe heart failure who are on the waiting list for cardiac transplantation. Intravenous enoximone therapy (an initial 0.5 mg/kg bolus, then 1.25-5.0 mcg/kg/min infusion) was administered to 35 transplant candidates with progressive heart failure despite optimal drug regimen including digoxin, diuretics, and ACE-inhibitors. In 18 out of 35 patients complete hemodynamic, echocardiographic, neurohumoral, and Holter-ECG studies were performed before and 24 hours after intravenous enoximone infusion. Patients were then continued on chronic oral therapy of 100 mg twice a day. Enoximone infusion increased the cardiac index (CI) (1.78 +/- 0.45 l/min/m2 vs 3.04 +/- 0.83 l/min/m2; p < 0.001) and stroke volume index (SVI)(22.33 +/- 9.45 ml/m2 vs 32.28 +/- 7.29 ml/m2; p < 0.05) and decreased wedge pressure (PCP)(24.1 +/- 11.98 mmHg vs 17.78 +/- 8.76 mmHg; p < 0.05) while mean arterial pressure (MAP) was unchanged. Left ventricular ejection time (LVET)(225.1 +/- 26.9 ms vs 242.2 +/- 25.8 ms; p < 0.05) was increased whereas other echocardiographic parameters were unchanged (Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension LVEDD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension LVESD, fractional shortening FS, early diastolic relaxation parameter Te). Plasma neurohumoral parameters did not change (Aldosterone, epinephrine, renin, atrial natriuretic factor) except for a significant drop in norepinephrine (936.7 +/- 443.2 pg/ml vs 522.4 +/- 287.6 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Holter-ECG parameters (ventricular premature beats VPB, couplets, ventricular tachycardia VT) were not influenced by enoximone infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.