created the maps. Josip Glaurdić is also grateful to the Leverhulme Trust and the Isaac Newton Trust (ECF-2012-399\7) which supported his work on this study.
How do voters in consolidating democracies see electoral integrity? How does election affect the change in perception of electoral integrity among these voters? What role does winning play in seeing an election as free and fair? Building on the theory of the winner-loser gap, we answer these questions using original two-wave panel surveys we conducted before and after three parliamentary elections in Southeast Europe in 2018 and 2020. The article focuses on changes of perception of electoral integrity as a function of satisfaction with the electoral results in contexts where the quality of elections has always been at the centre of political conflict. We specifically explore the socialization effect of elections in environments with notoriously low trust in political institutions and high electoral stakes. The article goes beyond the "sore loser" hypothesis and examines voters' both political preferences and personal characteristics potentially responsible for the change in perception of electoral integrity over the course of electoral cycle.
Studies of popular attitudes toward European integration have paid limited attention to the historical roots of voters' security preferences. Using an original municipality-level data set, we test whether the pattern of voting in Croatia's 2012 referendum on European Union accession was affected by the legacy of the country's 1991-1995 war for independence or rather by economic factors. While finding evidence for the impact of the communities' level of prosperity and structure of economy, our analysis more notably demonstrates that the intensity of the communities' experience of war had a positive effect on their level of support for European Union membership. This effect also had a strong interactive relationship with the communities' political allegiances, highlighting the importance not only of historically rooted security issues but also of political actors who make those issues electorally salient.In these times of upheaval in Europe, it bears repeating that the European Union (EU) is not only an economic but also a security organization. Its foundations are firmly rooted in the geopolitical considerations of the early Cold War period. Its traditional and nontraditional security functions make it arguably the most
Efforts to combat the COVID-19 crisis were characterized by a difficult trade-off: the stringency of the lockdowns decreased the spread of the virus, but amplified the damage to the economy. In this study, we analyze public attitude toward this trade-off using a survey-embedded experiment conducted with a quota sample of more than 7,000 respondents from Southeast Europe, collected in April and May 2020. The results show that public opinion generally favored saving lives even at a steep economic cost. However, the willingness to trade lives for the economy was greater when the heterogeneous health and economic consequences of lockdown policies for the young and the elderly were emphasized. Free-market views also make people more accepting of higher casualties, as do fears that the instituted measures will lead to a permanent expansion of government control over society.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.