Purpose This study aimed to elucidate the patient experience of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to guide patient-centered outcome measurement in drug development. Methods Patients with HCC participated in qualitative interviews to elicit disease-related signs/symptoms and impacts, using discussion guides developed from literature searches and discussions with oncologists. Interview participants rated the disturbance of their experiences (0–10 scale). A conceptual model was developed and mapped against patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments identified from database reviews. Results Interviews were conducted with 25 individuals with HCC (68% were men; median age: 63 years; 12% Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage A; 32% stage B; and 56% stage C) in the USA. Fifty-one HCC-related concepts were identified from the interviews and were grouped into eight sign/symptom categories (eating behavior/weight changes; extremities [arms, legs]; fatigue and strength; gastrointestinal; pain; sensory; skin; other) and four impact categories (emotional; physical; cognitive function; other) for the conceptual model. The most prevalent and disturbing experiences across the disease stages were fatigue/lack of energy and emotional impacts such as frustration, fear, and depression. Abdominal pain and skin-related issues were particularly common and disturbing in individuals with HCC stage C. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and HCC18 were identified as commonly used PRO instruments in HCC studies and captured the relevant signs/symptoms associated with the patient experience. Conclusion Patients with HCC reported a range of signs/symptoms and impacts that negatively affect daily functioning and quality of life. Including PRO measures in HCC clinical trials can provide meaningful patient perspectives during drug development.

Background Qualitative patient interviews and patient-reported outcome instruments are important tools to understand the patient experience of disease. The aim of this study was to use patient interviews to identify concepts relevant and important to patients living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 2–3b, develop a comprehensive conceptual model of the patient experience and debrief the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item instrument (KDQOL-36) for patients with CKD stages 2–3b. Methods Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with patients with CKD stages 2–3b to identify signs/symptoms and impacts most relevant and important to patients (i.e., ‘salient’ concepts) and develop a conceptual model for the disease. Based on the salient concepts identified in the interviews, new items were proposed to supplement the KDQOL-36. Cognitive debriefing was performed to evaluate the KDQOL-36 and the additional items. Results A total of 31 patients were interviewed in this study (22 for concept elicitation and 15 for cognitive debriefing). The interviews identified 56 concepts (33 signs/symptoms and 23 impacts), 17 of which had not been identified in a previous literature review. Four signs/symptoms (‘fatigue/lack of energy/tiredness’, ‘sleep problems’, ‘increased urination [including nocturia]’ and ‘swelling in legs/ankles/feet’) and two impacts (‘anxiety/worry’ and ‘general negative emotional/mental impact’) were identified as salient. Of the salient signs/symptoms, three were not covered by the KDQOL-36 (sleep problems, increased urination and swelling in legs/ankles/feet) and were represented during cognitive debriefing interviews through four additional items (trouble falling asleep, trouble staying asleep, increased urination [including nocturia] and swelling in legs/ankles/feet) generated in the style of the KDQOL-36. All patients found the KDQOL-36 plus the four additional items relevant, and the majority found them clear. Conclusions By identifying previously unknown concepts and augmenting the understanding of which are most important to patients, a comprehensive conceptual model was developed for patients who have CKD stages 2–3b. This study also demonstrates the suitability of the KDQOL-36 for patients who have CKD stages 2–3b and provides suggestions for how the instrument could be further developed to more comprehensively capture patient experience.

Aims Heart failure (HF) substantially limits the ability of patients to engage in physical activities. A detailed understanding of how patients experience these limitations is required to develop valid and sensitive measures for use in clinical research. This qualitative study was designed to provide a thorough description of how HF patients experience physical activity limitations in their daily lives. Methods and results Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 HF patients. Interview transcripts were coded with the aim of identifying key aspects of physical activity. Patients were divided between HF with preserved ejection fraction (n = 21, 52.5%) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (n = 19, 47.5%); the majority of patients were New York Heart Association Class II (n = 22, 52.5%) or Class III (n = 16, 40.0%). Relevant physical activity themes, including mobility and broader daily function areas, were identified. The most frequently reported mobility limitations involved difficulty walking (up a steep incline, up steps, and long distances), limited walking speed, difficulty standing for long periods of time, and difficulty carrying and lifting objects. These limitations were principally related to three HF symptoms: dyspnoea, tiredness/fatigue, and peripheral oedema. Patients adapted to their symptoms and related mobility limitations in several ways, including taking rests during an activity, doing an activity more slowly, and avoiding/refraining from an activity altogether. The broader daily function areas most commonly impacted by the mobility limitations were housework, exercising or playing sports, and going shopping. Conclusions Heart failure patients report numerous physical activity limitations. These specific mobility and daily function areas can be measured using clinical outcome assessments (e.g. patient-reported outcomes and performance outcomes) in clinical trials and observational research. Accelerometry can be used to contribute to a holistic picture of patient functioning by passively collecting this type of data.

No abstract

No abstract