Background People experiencing homelessness are at increased risk of COVID-19, but little is known about specific risk factors for infection within homeless shelters. Methods We performed widespread SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and collected risk factor information at all homeless shelters in Chicago with at least one reported case of COVID-19 (n=21). Multivariable, mixed-effects log-binomial models were built to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for SARS-CoV-2 infection for both individual and facility-level risk factors. Results During March 1 to May 1, 2020, 1717 shelter residents and staff were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 472 (27%) persons tested positive. Prevalence of infection was higher for residents (431/1435, 30%) than for staff (41/282, 15%) (prevalence ratio [PR] =2.52, 95% CI 1.78–3.58). The majority of residents with SARS-CoV-2 infection (293/406 with available information about symptoms, 72%) reported no symptoms at the time of specimen collection or within the following two weeks.Among residents, sharing a room with a large number of people was associated with increased likelihood of infection (aPR for sharing with >20 people compared to single rooms = 1.76, 95% CI 1.11–2.80), and current smoking was associated with reduced likelihood of infection (aPR=0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.85). At the facility-level, a higher proportion of residents leaving and returning each day was associated with increased prevalence (aPR=1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16), while an increase in the number of private bathrooms was associated with reduced prevalence (aPR for one additional private bathroom per 100 people = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87–0.98). Conclusions We identified a high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in homeless shelters. Reducing the number of residents sharing dormitories might reduce the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection. When community transmission is high, limiting movement of persons experiencing homelessness into and out of shelters might also be beneficial.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction: Sexual violence is a significant public health concern in the United States, affecting as many as one in two women and one in four men. However, few medical schools offer education on trauma-informed communication with patients who disclose sexual assault (SA). The goal of this training was to provide medical students with an understanding of how to empathically respond to SA disclosures, collect pertinent medical information while avoiding retraumatization, and empower patients to feel in control of their care. Methods: One hundred forty-nine second-year medical students at Rush Medical College attended a 1-hour didactic lecture discussing the needs of SA survivors followed by small-group sessions during which they practiced trauma-informed communication skills. Students completed anonymous pre-and postsession surveys featuring nine Likert-scale questions that assessed comfort level providing trauma-informed care. Results: Of the 149 attendees, 88 (59%) completed matched pre-and posttraining surveys that demonstrated significant improvement in all assessed metrics of trauma-informed care, including comfort collecting information, empowering survivors, and responding to and normalizing patients' concerns. Two weeks after completing the training, all 149 students also correctly answered a free-response question testing retention of key training takeaways on their Sexuality and Reproduction final exam. Discussion: The training significantly improved medical student comfort in providing trauma-informed care across all collected metrics. The training can be feasibly reproduced at other institutions so that future physicians across specialties can provide trauma-informed care, ideally improving the acute and chronic health outcomes that disproportionately affect SA survivors.

Perceived spiritual needs may increase when patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers are confronted with the challenges of physical and psychological distress. Given the intertwined relationships between patients and family caregivers, their interdependence should be considered to understand how perceived spiritual needs affect the quality of life of their own and of their partner. This study used the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model as the conceptual model to investigate the mutual effects of perceived spiritual needs on the quality of life in patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers after being admitted to hospice. This cross-sectional study used the baseline data of a large clinical trial and identified that patients with cancer and their family caregivers perceived similar spiritual needs associated with the community and outlook needs and had fewer unmet spiritual needs. After controlling for partner effects, perceived outlook needs shown in patients significantly predicted their own functional well-being and social/spiritual well-being. Outlook and community needs perceived by family caregivers also significantly predicted their own mental health. Although partner effects were not shown as expected, the findings provide insight into the mutuality of spirituality and demonstrate the necessity of providing timely and ongoing spiritual assessment and care.