Objective While vascular dysfunction is well-defined in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), disease-related alterations in the peripheral vasculature of HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are not well characterized. Thus, we sought test the hypothesis that HFpEF patients would demonstrate reduced vascular function, at both the conduit artery and microvascular levels, compared to controls. Methods We examined both conduit artery function via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and microvascular function via reactive hyperemia (RH) following 5 min of ischemia in 24 Class II–IV HFpEF patients and 24 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and brachial artery diameter. Results FMD was reduced in HFpEF patients compared to controls (HFpEF: 3.1 ± 0.7%; Controls: 5.1 ± 0.5%; P = 0.03). However, shear rate at time of peak brachial artery dilation was lower in HFpEF patients compared to controls (HFpEF: 42,070 ± 4,018 s−1; Controls: 69,018 ± 9,509 s−1; P = 0.01), and when brachial artery FMD was normalized for the shear stimulus, cumulative area-under-the-curve (AUC) at peak dilation, the between-group differences were eliminated (HFpEF: 0.11 ± 0.03 %/AUC; Controls: 0.09 ± 0.01 %/AUC; P = 0.58). RH, assessed as AUC, was lower in HFpEF patients (HFpEF: 454 ± 35 mL; Controls: 660 ± 63 mL; P < 0.01). Conclusions Collectively, these data suggest that maladaptations at the microvascular level contribute to the pathophysiology of HFpEF, while conduit artery vascular function is not diminished beyond that which occurs with healthy aging.
People who become hyperthermic during exercise display large increases in heart rate (HR) and reductions in stroke volume (SV). It is not clear if the reduction in SV is due primarily to hyperthermia or if it is a secondary effect of an elevation in HR reducing ventricular filling. In the present study, the upward drift of HR during prolonged exercise was prevented by a very small dose of the β1-adrenoreceptor blocker (atenolol; βB), thus allowing SV to be compared at a given HR during normothermia and hyperthermia. Eleven men cycled for 60 min at 57% of peak O2 uptake after receiving placebo control (PL) or a low dose (0.2 mg/kg) of βB. Hyperthermia was induced by reducing heat dissipation during exercise. Four experimental conditions were studied: normothermia-PL, normothermia-βB, hyperthermia-PL, and hyperthermia-βB. Hyperthermia increased skin and core temperature by 4.3 degrees C and 0.8 degrees C (P<0.01), respectively. βB prevented HR elevation with hyperthermia: HR values were similar at minute 60 during normothermia-PL and hyperthermia-βB (155±11 and 154±13 beats/min, respectively, P=0.82). However, SV was increased by 7% during the final 20 min of exercise during hyperthermia-βB compared with normothermia-PL (treatment×time interaction, P=0.03). In conclusion, when matched for HR, mild hyperthermia increased SV during exercise. Furthermore, the reduction in SV throughout prolonged exercise under normothermic and mildly hyperthermic conditions appears to be due to the increase in HR.
To better understand the mechanisms responsible for exercise intolerance in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the present study sought to evaluate the hemodynamic responses to small muscle mass exercise in this cohort. In 25 HFrEF patients (64 ± 2 yr) and 17 healthy, age-matched control subjects (64 ± 2 yr), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), and limb blood flow were examined during graded static-intermittent handgrip (HG) and dynamic single-leg knee-extensor (KE) exercise. During HG exercise, MAP increased similarly between groups. CO increased significantly (+1.3 ± 0.3 l/min) in the control group, but it remained unchanged across workloads in HFrEF patients. At 15% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), forearm blood flow was similar between groups, while HFrEF patients exhibited an attenuated increase at the two highest intensities compared with controls, with the greatest difference at the highest workload (352 ± 22 vs. 492 ± 48 ml/min, HFrEF vs. control, 45% MVC). During KE exercise, MAP and CO increased similarly across work rates between groups. However, HFrEF patients exhibited a diminished leg hyperemic response across all work rates, with the most substantial decrement at the highest intensity (1,842 ± 64 vs. 2,675 ± 81 ml/min; HFrEF vs. control, 15 W). Together, these findings indicate a marked attenuation in exercising limb perfusion attributable to impairments in peripheral vasodilatory capacity during both arm and leg exercise in patients with HFrEF, which likely plays a role in limiting exercise capacity in this patient population.
Background Exercise intolerance is a hallmark symptom of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be related to an impaired ability to appropriately increase blood flow to the exercising muscle. Methods We evaluated leg blood flow (LBF, ultrasound Doppler), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP, photoplethysmography) during dynamic, single leg knee-extensor (KE) exercise in HFpEF patients (n = 21; 68 ± 2 yrs) and healthy controls (n = 20; 71 ± 2 yrs). Results HFpEF patients exhibited a marked attrition during KE exercise, with only 60% able to complete the exercise protocol. In participants who completed all exercise intensities (0-5-10-15W; HFpEF, n = 13; Controls, n = 16), LBF was not different at 0W and 5W, but was 15-25% lower in HFpEF compared to controls at 10W and 15W (P < 0.001). Likewise, leg vascular conductance (LVC), an index of vasodilation, was not different at 0W and 5W, but was 15-20% lower in HFpEF compared to controls at 10W and 15W (P < 0.05). In contrast to these peripheral deficits, exercise-induced changes in central variables (HR, SV, CO), as well as MAP, were similar between groups. Conclusions These data reveal a marked reduction in LBF and LVC in HFpEF patients during exercise that cannot be attributed to a disease-related alteration in central hemodynamics, suggesting that impaired vasodilation in the exercising skeletal muscle vasculature may play a key role in the exercise intolerance associated with this patient population.
The mechanisms responsible for heat stress-induced reductions in tolerance to a simulated hemorrhage are unclear. Although a high degree of variability exists in the level of reduction in tolerance amongst individuals, syncope will always occur when cerebral perfusion is inadequate. This study tested the hypothesis that the magnitude of reduction in cerebral perfusion during heat stress is related to the reduction in tolerance to a lower body negative pressure (LBNP) challenge. On different days (one during normothermia and the other after a 1.5°C rise in internal temperature), 20 individuals were exposed to a LBNP challenge to presyncope. Tolerance was quantified as a cumulative stress index, and the difference in cumulative stress index between thermal conditions was used to categorize individuals most (large difference) and least (small difference) affected by the heat stress. Cerebral perfusion, as indexed by middle cerebral artery blood velocity, was reduced during heat stress compared with normothermia (P < 0.001); however, the magnitude of reduction did not differ between groups (P = 0.51). In the initial stage of LBNP during heat stress (LBNP 20 mmHg), middle cerebral artery blood velocity and end-tidal PCO(2) were lower; whereas, heart rate was higher in the large difference group compared with small difference group (P < 0.05 for all). These data indicate that variability in heat stress-induced reductions in tolerance to a simulated hemorrhage is not related to reductions in cerebral perfusion in this thermal condition. However, responses affecting cerebral perfusion during LBNP may explain the interindividual variability in tolerance to a simulated hemorrhage when heat stressed.
Patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) experience impaired limb blood flow during exercise, which may be due to a disease-related increase in α-adrenergic receptor vasoconstriction. Thus, in eight patients with HFrEF (63 ± 4 yr) and eight well-matched controls (63 ± 2 yr), we examined changes in leg blood flow (Doppler ultrasound) during intra-arterial infusion of phenylephrine (PE; an α1-adrenergic receptor agonist) and phentolamine (Phen; a nonspecific α-adrenergic receptor antagonist) at rest and during dynamic single-leg knee-extensor exercise (0, 5, and 10 W). At rest, the PE-induced reduction in blood flow was significantly attenuated in patients with HFrEF (−15 ± 7%) compared with controls (−36 ± 5%). During exercise, the controls exhibited a blunted reduction in blood flow induced by PE (−12 ± 4, −10 ± 4, and −9 ± 2% at 0, 5, and 10 W, respectively) compared with rest, while the PE-induced change in blood flow was unchanged compared with rest in the HFrEF group (−8 ± 5, −10 ± 3, and −14 ± 3%, respectively). Phen administration increased leg blood flow to a greater extent in the HFrEF group at rest (+178 ± 34% vs. +114 ± 28%, HFrEF vs. control) and during exercise (36 ± 6, 37 ± 7, and 39 ± 6% vs. 13 ± 3, 14 ± 1, and 8 ± 3% at 0, 5, and 10 W, respectively, in HFrEF vs. control). Together, these findings imply that a HFrEF-related increase in α-adrenergic vasoconstriction restrains exercising skeletal muscle blood flow, potentially contributing to diminished exercise capacity in this population.
While the contribution of non-cardiac complications to the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have been increasingly recognized, disease-related changes in peripheral vascular control remain poorly understood. We utilized small muscle mass handgrip exercise to concomitantly evaluate exercising muscle blood flow and conduit vessel endothelium-dependent vasodilation in individuals with HFpEF (n = 25) compared to hypertensive controls (HTN) (n = 25). Heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), brachial artery blood velocity, and brachial artery diameter were assessed during progressive intermittent handgrip (HG) exercise (15-30-45% MVC). Forearm blood flow (FBF) and vascular conductance (FVC) were determined to quantify the peripheral hemodynamic response to HG exercise, and changes in brachial artery diameter were evaluated to assess endothelium-dependent vasodilation. HR, SV, and CO were not different between groups across exercise intensities. However, although FBF was not different between groups at the lowest exercise intensity, FBF was significantly lower (20-40%), in individuals with HFpEF at the two higher exercise intensities (30% MVC: 229±8 vs. 274±23 ml/min; 45% MVC: 283±17 vs. 399±34 ml/min, HFpEF vs. HTN). FVC was not different between groups at 15 and 30% MVC, but was ≈20% lower in HFpEF at the highest exercise intensity. Brachial artery diameter increased across exercise intensities in both HFpEF and HTN, with no difference between groups. These findings demonstrate an attenuation in muscle blood flow during exercise in HFpEF in the absence of disease-related changes in central hemodynamics or endothelial function.
We sought to evaluate the muscle metaboreflex in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, with an emphasis on the interaction between cardiac and peripheral vascular haemodynamics across multiple levels of metaboreceptor activation. In 23 HFrEF patients (63 ± 2 years of age) and 15 healthy control subjects (64 ± 3 years of age), we examined changes in mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, systemic vascular conductance, effective arterial elastance, stroke work and forearm deoxyhaemoglobin concentration during metaboreceptor activation elicited by postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) after three levels of static-intermittent handgrip exercise (15, 30 and 45% maximal voluntary contraction). Across workloads, the metaboreflex-induced increase in deoxyhaemoglobin and mean arterial pressure were similar between groups. However, in control subjects, the pressor response was driven by changes (Δ) in cardiac output (Δ495 ± 155, Δ564 ± 156 and Δ666 ± 217 ml min ), whereas this change was accomplished by intensity-dependent reductions in systemic vascular conductance in patients with HFrEF (Δ-4.9 ± 1.5, Δ-9.1 ± 1.9 and Δ-12.7 ± 1.8 ml min mmHg ). This differential response contributed to the exaggerated increases in effective arterial elastance in HFrEF patients compared with control subjects, coupled with a blunted response in stroke work in the HFrEF patients. Together, these findings indicate a preserved role of the metaboreflex-induced pressor response in HFrEF but suggest that this response is governed by changes in the peripheral circulation. The net effect of this response appears to be maladaptive, as it places a substantial haemodynamic load on the left ventricle that may exacerbate left ventricular systolic dysfunction and contribute to exercise intolerance in this patient population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.