Purpose Exposure to different types of vaccine information in social media can result in parents making disparate vaccine decisions, including not following national guidelines for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. We sought to characterize parents’ exposure to and engagement with information about HPV vaccination in social media, and the associations between exposure to such information and vaccine decisions for their adolescent children. Methods In 2019, we conducted a web-based survey with a national sample of 1073 parents of adolescents who use social media. The survey assessed whether parents have seen information in favor, against, or mixed about HPV vaccination. Multivariable logistic regressions assessed correlates of vaccine decisions, including HPV vaccine initiation, delay, and refusal. Results Sixty-one percent of parents reported that their children have initiated HPV vaccination. Over one-third of parents (37%) reported seeing HPV vaccine information on social media, which was either in favor (20%), against (5%), or a mix (12%). Parents exposed to information in favor were more likely than those who saw no information to have initiated HPV vaccination (OR = 1.74, 95% CI:1.24, 2.44). Parents exposed to information against vaccination were more likely to have delayed (OR = 3.29, 95% CI:1.66, 6.51) or refused (OR = 4.72, 95% CI:2.35, 9.50) HPV vaccination. Exposure to mixed information was also significantly associated with vaccine delay and refusal. Discussion Our findings suggest that the type of information seen on social media regarding HPV vaccination may influence the decisions parents make about vaccinating their children. Efforts should be sought to increase online information in favor of HPV vaccination and combat vaccine misinformation in social media.
From 2010-2014, colorectal cancer (CRC) was the second highest incident cancer and leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Puerto Rico (PR). Although preventable through screening and treatment, colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or colonoscopy remains low for adults in PR. Data from the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicated that 18.0% of the PR population aged 50 to 75 had undergone an FOBT within the past year compared to 8.0% in the United States (US). Additionally, 50.1% of age-eligible Puerto Ricans report ever having a colonoscopy in the past 10 years compared to 63.5% in the US. Given the higher burden of CRC and the low CRCS rates in PR, we developed ¡Salud!, por la Vida (SPLV), an educational program which aims to increase CRCS in non-adherent men and women aged 50 and 75 who attend Federally Qualified Health Clinics (FQHCs) in PR. We used Intervention Mapping (IM) as framework to develop an educational intervention that is theoretically sound and grounded in evidence. For the development of SPLV, steps 1 to 4 of IM were completed. Step 1: a needs assessment conducted through focus groups and key informant interviews to gather quantitative and qualitative data for the development of the logic model and the program; step 2: development of a logic model of change and matrices of change objectives; step 3: selection of theory and evidence-based methods and strategies; and step 4: program production, components, and materials. Step 1 revealed 5 main themes: (1) lack of knowledge about CRC and CRCS practices; (2) patient’s fear of the CRC test results; (3) low risk perception of CRC; (4) lack of provider CRCS recommendation; and (5) the importance of social support. Interviews revealed that the majority of clinics offer FOBT as part of their CRCS protocol; where 74.0% of these had a clinical laboratory on-site. Over half (53.0%) had implemented electronic medical records and 82.0% had health educators on staff. A logic model was developed by combining personal behaviors with behavioral determinants and identifying beliefs targeted by the intervention (step 2). Tailored interactive multimedia intervention (TIMI) and small media were selected as the practical application to deliver the intervention (step 3). Development of the program included 5 components: script development; testimonials; animations; written materials; and newsletter. Pre-testing was conducted to evaluate the usability of the program. Our educational program, SPLV, is completed and currently being implemented, using a randomized trial. Trial is being conducted in 10 FQHCs and will recruit 710 participants aged 50 to 75 who have no prior history of CRC and are not adherent to CRCS guidelines. Clinics are randomized to either the intervention group (TIMI) or the control group (usual care). We aim that this intervention will significantly increase CRCS rates and provide evidence to disseminate this educational effort to FQHCs in PR. Citation Format: Vivian Colón-López, Camille Vélez-Alamo, Adrianna Acevedo-Fontanez, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Jorge L Rodríguez-Lebrón, Josheili Y Llavona-Ortiz, Yolanda Serra-Martínez, Ileska Valencia-Torres, María Fernández. ¡Salud!, por la Vida, an educational intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in Puerto Ricans [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B009.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.