No abstract

The Irrelevant Sound Effect (ISE) is the finding that serial recall performance is impaired under complex auditory backgrounds such as speech as compared to white noise or silence (Colle & Welsh, 1976). Several findings have demonstrated that ISE occurs with nonspeech backgrounds and that the changing-state complexity of the background stimuli is critical to ISE (e.g., Jones & Macken, 1993). In a pair of experiments, we investigate whether speech-like qualities of the irrelevant background have an effect beyond their changing-state complexity. We do so by using two kinds of transformations of speech with identical changing-state complexity; one kind that preserved speech-like information (sinewave speech and fully-reversed sinewave speech) and others in which this information was distorted (two selectively-reversed sinewave speech conditions). Our results indicate that even when changing-state complexity is held constant, sinewave speech conditions in which speech-like interformant relationships are disrupted produce less ISE than those in which these relationships are preserved. This indicates that speech-like properties of the background are important beyond their changing-state complexity for ISE.

A speech signal carries information about meaning and about the talker conveying that meaning. It is now known that these two dimensions are related. There is evidence that gaining experience with a particular talker in one modality not only facilitates better phonetic perception in that modality, but also transfers across modalities to allow better phonetic perception in the other. This finding suggests that experience with a talker provides familiarity with some amodal properties of their articulation such that the experience can be shared across modalities. The present study investigates if experience with talker-specific articulatory information can also support cross-modal talker learning. In Experiment 1 we show that participants can learn to identify ten novel talkers from point-light and sinewave speech, expanding on prior work. Point-light and sinewave speech also supported similar talker identification accuracies, and similar patterns of talker confusions were found across stimulus types. Experiment 2 showed these stimuli could also support cross-modal talker matching, further expanding on prior work. Finally, in Experiment 3 we show that learning to identify talkers in one modality (visual-only point-light speech) facilitates learning of those same talkers in another modality (auditory-only sinewave speech). These results suggest that some of the information for talker identity takes a modality-independent form.

The Irrelevant Sound Effect (ISE) is the finding that background sound impairs accuracy for visually presented serial recall tasks. Among various auditory backgrounds, speech typically acts as the strongest distractor. Based on the changing-state hypothesis, speech is a disruptive background because it is more complex than other nonspeech backgrounds. In the current study, we evaluate an alternative explanation by examining whether the speech-likeness of the background (speech fidelity) contributes, beyond signal complexity, to the ISE. We did this by using noise-vocoded speech as a background. In Experiment 1, we varied the complexity of the background by manipulating the number of vocoding channels. Results indicate that the ISE increases with the number of channels, suggesting that more complex signals produce greater ISEs. In Experiment 2, we varied complexity and speech fidelity independently. At each channel level, we selectively reversed a subset of channels to design a low-fidelity signal that was equated in overall complexity. Experiment 2 results indicated that speech-like noise-vocoded speech produces a larger ISE than selectively reversed noise-vocoded speech. Finally, in Experiment 3, we evaluated the locus of the speech-fidelity effect by assessing the distraction produced by these stimuli in a missing-item task. In this task, even though noise-vocoded speech disrupted task performance relative to silence, neither its complexity nor speech fidelity contributed to this effect. Together, these findings indicate a clear role for speech fidelity of the background beyond its changing-state quality and its attention capture potential.

No abstract