Noninvasive brain stimulation methods are becoming increasingly common tools in the kit of the cognitive scientist. In particular, transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is showing great promise as a tool to causally manipulate the brain and understand how information is processed. The popularity of this method of brain stimulation is based on the fact that it is safe, inexpensive, its effects are long lasting, and you can increase the likelihood that neurons will fire near one electrode and decrease the likelihood that neurons will fire near another. However, this method of manipulating the brain to draw causal inferences is not without complication. Because tDCS methods continue to be refined and are not yet standardized, there are reports in the literature that show some striking inconsistencies. Primary among the complications of the technique is that the tDCS method uses two or more electrodes to pass current and all of these electrodes will have effects on the tissue underneath them. In this tutorial, we will share what we have learned about using tDCS to manipulate how the brain perceives, attends, remembers, and responds to information from our environment. Our goal is to provide a starting point for new users of tDCS and spur discussion of the standardization of methods to enhance replicability.

Findings suggest that MVPA may be associated with greater executive function and working memory in BCSs. Further, this effect may be partially indirect through cancer-related symptoms (e.g., fatigue). Results emphasize the need for additional scientific investigation in the context of prospective and efficacy trials.

BackgroundEvidence suggests reallocating daily sedentary time to physical activity or sleep confers important health benefits in cancer survivors. Despite emerging research suggesting physical activity as a treatment for cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), little is known about the interactive effects of behaviors across the 24-h period. The present purpose was to examine the cognitive effects of reallocating sedentary time to light-intensity physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), or sleep in breast cancer survivors.MethodsBreast cancer survivors (N = 271, Mage = 57.81 ± 9.50 years) completed iPad-based questionnaires and cognitive tasks assessing demographics, health history, executive function, and processing speed (Task-Switch, Trail Making). Participants wore an accelerometer for seven consecutive days to measure their sedentary, physical activity, and sleep behaviors. Single effects (each behavior individually) and partition (controlling for other behaviors) models were used to examine associations among behaviors and cognitive performance. Isotemporal substitution models were used to test the cognitive effects of substituting 30 min of sedentary time with 30 min of light-intensity activity, MVPA, and sleep.ResultsMVPA was associated with faster Task-switch reaction time in the partition models (stay: B = − 35.31, p = 0.02; switch: B = − 48.24, p = 0.004). Replacing 30 min of sedentary time with 30 min of MVPA yielded faster reaction times on Task-Switch stay (B = − 29.37, p = 0.04) and switch (B = − 39.49, p = 0.02) trials. In Trails A single effects models, sedentary behavior was associated with faster completion (B = − 0.97, p = 0.03) and light-intensity activity with slower completion (B = 1.25, p = 0.006). No single effects were observed relative to Trails B completion (all p > 0.05). Only the effect of MVPA was significant in the partition models (Trails A: B = − 3.55, p = 0.03; Trails B: B = − 4.46, p = 0.049). Replacing sedentary time with light-intensity activity was associated with slower Trails A (B = 1.55 p = 0.002) and Trails B (B = 1.69, p = 0.02) completion. Replacing light activity with MVPA yielded faster Trails A (B = − 4.35, p = 0.02) and Trails B (B = − 5.23, p = 0.03) completion.ConclusionsFindings support previous research suggesting MVPA may be needed to improve cognitive function in breast cancer survivors. Trails findings underscore the need to dissect sedentary contexts to better understand the impact of daily behavioral patterns on CRCI. Additional research investigating the cognitive impacts of behaviors across the 24-h period is warranted.Trial registrationThis study is registered with United States ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02523677; 8/14/2015).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4603-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

No abstract

Efforts to help increase or maintain high levels of physical activity may be critical to helping BCS maintain their PWB.

No abstract

Objectives Essential Tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurologic conditions, and conservative measures are frequently suboptimal. Recent data from a multi-institution, randomized controlled clinical trial demonstrated that Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy improves upper limb tremor in medically refractory ET. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of this novel therapy in comparison to existing procedural options. Methods PubMed and Cochrane Library searches were performed for studies of MRgFUS, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for ET. Pre-and post-operative tremor-related disability scores were collected from 32 studies involving 83 MRgFUS, 615 DBS, and 260 SRS cases. Utility (defined as percent change in functional disability) was calculated, and Medicare reimbursements were collected as a proxy for societal cost -costs of MRgFUS for ET were derived from a combination of available costs of approved indications and SRS costs where appropriate. A decision and cost-effectiveness analysis was then constructed, implementing meta-analytic techniques. Results MRgFUS thalamotomy resulted in significantly higher utility scores compared with DBS and SRS based on estimates of Medicare reimbursement (p < 0.001). MRgFUS was also the most inexpensive procedure out of the three (p < 0.001). Conclusions Preliminary experience with MRgFUS for ET suggests that this novel therapeutic may be more effective than available alternatives and potentially less costly for society. It thus will likely "dominate" DBS and SRS as a more cost-effective option for medically refractory ET. Our findings support further investigation of MRgFUS for ET and broad adoption. Objectives The ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) is not visible on conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).A novel method for tractography-based VIM identification has recently been described. We report the short-term clinical results of prospective VIM targeting with tractography in a cohort of patients undergoing Focused Ultrasound thalamotomy. Methods All patients underwent structural and diffusion weighted imaging (60 diffusion directions, 2 mm isovoxel) with 3 Tesla MRI scanner (Philips Ingenia CX). The images were processed using streamline tractography (Stealth Viz, Medtronic Inc.). The lateral and posterior borders of VIM were defined by tracking the pyramidal tract and medial lemniscus respectively. A VIM region of interest (ROI) was placed 3 mm away from these borders (Figs. 1, 2 and 3). The structural connectivity of this VIM ROI was confirmed to the motor cortex (M1) and cerebellum. The coordinates of tractography-based VIM in relation to posterior commissure were noted for surgical targeting. The parameters analyzed include a clinical tremor scale (pre-, intraoperative, and post operative), operative time, and number of sonications. Results Tractography-based VIM targeting was successful in 7 out of 8 patients. The coordinates of tractography-based VIM were significantly different from...