When brought into captivity, wild animals can adapt to domestication within 10 generations. Such adaptations may decrease fitness in natural conditions. Many selective pressures are disrupted in captivity, including social behavioral networks. Although lack of sociality in captivity appears to mediate domestication, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Additionally, determining the contribution of genetic inheritance vs. transgenerational effects during relaxed selection may provide insight into the flexibility of adaptation. When wild-derived mice kept under laboratory conditions for eight generations were reintroduced to sociality and promiscuity (free mate choice), they adapted within two generations. Fitness assessments between this promiscuous lineage and a monogamous laboratory lineage revealed malespecific effects. Promiscuous-line males had deficits in viability, but a striking advantage in attracting mates, and their scent marks were also more attractive to females. Here, we investigate mechanistic details underlying this olfactory signal and identify a role of major urinary protein (MUP) pheromones. Promiscuous-line males inherit higher MUP expression than monogamous-line males through transgenerational inheritance. Sociality-driven maternal and paternal effects reveal intriguing conflicts among parents and offspring over pheromone expression. MUP up-regulation is not driven by hormone-driven transduction pathways, but rather is associated with reduction in DNA methylation of a CpG dinucleotide in the promoter. This reduction in methylation could enhance transcription by promoting the binding of transcription factor USF1 (upstream stimulatory factor 1). Finally, we experimentally demonstrate that increased MUP expression is a female attractant. These results identify molecular mechanisms guiding domestication and adaptive responses to fluctuating sociality.social selection | sexy sons | epigenetics W ild animals bred in captivity have been observed to adapt to domestication within 10 generations (1-4). As a result, captive bred animals often have reduced fitness when reintroduced to natural conditions (5). Selective pressures disrupted by captivity include inbreeding avoidance, effective population size, disease exposure, predation, and sexual selection. For the latter example, evidence suggests that lack of social context for mate choice mediates adaptation to captivity (6). This context is especially relevant for social animals because the opportunity for mating success is regulated by hierarchical behavioral networks (i.e., social selection) (7), and this information is missing in captivity. The molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypes affected by lack of social selection are poorly understood. Furthermore, rapid adaptation to captivity raises questions about the roles of genetic inheritance vs. transgenerational effects (i.e., inheritance independent of genetic variation) (8). Resolving the mechanistic and hereditary basis of these transitions can provide insight into the flexibilit...

Sexual size dimorphism results when female and male body size is influenced differently by natural and sexual selection. Typically, in polygynous species larger male body size is thought to be favored in competition for mates and constraints on maximal body size are due to countervailing natural selection on either sex; however, it has been postulated that sexual selection itself may result in stabilizing selection at an optimal mass. Here we test this hypothesis by retrospectively assessing the influence of body mass, one metric of body size, on the fitness of 113 wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) residing within ten replicate semi‐natural enclosures from previous studies conducted by our laboratory. Enclosures possess similar levels of sexual selection, but relaxed natural selection, relative to natural systems. Heavier females produced more offspring, while males of intermediate mass had the highest fitness. Female results suggest that some aspect of natural selection, absent from enclosures, acts to decrease their body mass, while the upper and lower boundaries of male mass are constrained by sexual selection.

One type of parental effect occurs when changes in parental phenotype or environment trigger changes to offspring phenotype. Such nongenetic parental effects can be precisely triggered in response to an environmental cue in time‐locked fashion, or in other cases, persist for multiple generations after the cue has been removed, suggesting multiple timescales of action. For parental effects to serve as reliable signals of current environmental conditions, they should be reversible, such that when cues change, offspring phenotypes change in accordance. Social hierarchy is a prevalent feature of the environment, and current parental social status could signal the environment in which offspring will be born. Here, we sought to address parental effects of social status and their timescale of action in mice. We show that territorial competition in seminatural environments affects offspring growth. Although dominant males are not heavier than nondominant or control males, they produce faster growing offspring, particularly sons. The timing, effect‐size, and sex‐specificity of this association are modulated by maternal social experience. We show that a change in paternal social status is sufficient to modulate offspring weight: from one breeding cycle to the next, status‐ascending males produce heavier sons than before, and status‐descending males produce lighter sons than before. Current paternal status is also highly predictive of liver transcription in sons, including molecular pathways controlling oxidative phosphorylation and iron metabolism. These results are consistent with a parental effect of social experience, although alternative explanations are considered. In summary, changes in paternal social status are associated with changes in offspring growth and metabolism.

No abstract

Parental effects are an important source of adaptive traits. By contrast, parental effects failing to regulate offspring phenotype to fit current conditions could be deleterious. Although adaptive parental responses to single cues have been identified, we lack an understanding of the reversibility of parental effects across breeding cycles in a fluctuating environment. Social status of parents can occasionally fluctuate and, in turn, influence high-fitness pathways available to offspring. We show that social competition status results in robust parental effects on growth in mice. Dominant males produce faster growing offspring because of status related cues, not genetic associations. The timing, effect-size, and sex-specificity of this paternal effect are modulated by maternal experience. We experimentally demonstrate that status-ascending males produce heavier sons than before, and status-descending males produce lighter sons than before. Paternal status predicts genome-wide transcription in the liver, including transcriptional networks controlling xenobiotic and fatty acid metabolism, and oxidative phosphorylation. Our study demonstrates that paternal social status reversibly conditions offspring growth in naturalistic environments.