These words were written shortly after Freud's death in 1939. Auden was reflecting the profound influence of Freud and psychoanalysis on the understanding of literature, art, and the human mind. Auden's words are relevant today.This special issue of Psychoanalytic Psychology celebrates the 150th anniversary of the birth of Sigmund Freud on May 6, 1856. The 15 papers and one book review in different ways address the question of Freud's continued relevance. The title might alternately have been "Is Freud Relevant Today?" Witness the marginalization of psychoanalysis in psychology textbooks and the proliferation of competing theories. If Freud has been put on the shelf, his ideas are present in our everyday speech and in the reinvention and revisions of psychoanalytic concepts in psychology, something that Robert Bornstein so succinctly addresses. Thus, to call repression cognitive avoidance and parapraxis retrieval error changes the words but not the phenomena (Bornstein, 2005, p. 327). Human conflict by any other name is still conflict. This 150th anniversary may not have the excitement of the 100th anniversary of Freud's birth. In 1956, each volume of Jones's biography of Freud was eagerly awaited and in my graduate school, Freud was prominently studied and psychoanalysts were well represented on faculties of psychology. Nevertheless, the vitality of our Division and the prominence of this journal attest to the contemporary vitality of Freud's legacy.The contributors to this special issue approach the topic in multiple ways. Some authors stay close to the question, while other authors write on topics dear to them. All are, nonetheless, distinguished contributors to contemporary psychoanalysis and most need no introduction to the readership of this journal.Leo Rangell argues against the current state of pluralism in psychoanalytic theory and for a total composite unitary theory that encompasses all observable phenomena. William Meissner responds to the question of relevance directly, arguing that the continued vitality of psychoanalysis requires that it not remain isolated from interdisciplinary collaborative research. The philosopher of science, Adolf Grunbaum, repeats his oft-stated epistemological critique of the principle tenets of psychoanalysis. Zvi Lothane, also well steeped in philosophy, supports the idea that Freud's legacy is very much with us and that the idea of a dynamic unconscious is a fact of mental life. Robert Wallerstein writes about psychoanalysis as a special scientific theory and its place in research. Frank Summers, viewing Freud in a contemporary light, expands on Freud's relevance for psychoanalytic technique. Robert Bornstein discusses the importance of personality pathology for diagnosis, research, and treatment. From Australia, Douglas Kirsner argues for Freud's debt to
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.