ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) and quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) on the accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) using a virtual noniodine (VNI) reconstruction algorithm on a first-generation, clinical, photon counting detector computed tomography system.Materials and MethodsCoronary artery calcium scoring was evaluated in an anthropomorphic chest phantom simulating 3 different patient sizes by using 2 extension rings (small: 300 × 200 mm, medium: 350 × 250 mm, large: 400 × 300 mm) and in patients (n = 61; final analyses only in patients with coronary calcifications [n = 34; 65.4 ± 10.0 years; 73.5% male]), who underwent nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-gated, cardiac computed tomography on a photon counting detector system. Phantom and patient data were reconstructed using a VNI reconstruction algorithm at different VMI (55–80 keV) and QIR (strength 1–4) levels (CACSVNI). True noncontrast (TNC) scans at 70 keV and QIR “off” were used as reference for phantom and patient studies (CACSTNC).ResultsIn vitro and in vivo CACSVNI showed strong correlation (r > 0.9, P < 0.001 for all) and excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9 for all) with CACSTNC at all investigated VMI and QIR levels. Phantom and patient CACSVNI significantly increased with decreasing keV levels (in vitro: from 475.2 ± 26.3 at 80 keV up to 652.5 ± 42.2 at 55 keV; in vivo: from 142.5 [7.4/737.7] at 80 keV up to 248.1 [31.2/1144] at 55 keV; P < 0.001 for all), resulting in an overestimation of CACSVNI at 55 keV compared with CACSTNC at 70 keV in some cases (in vitro: 625.8 ± 24.4; in vivo: 225.4 [35.1/959.7]). In vitro CACS increased with rising QIR at low keV. In vivo scores were significantly higher at QIR 1 compared with QIR 4 only at 60 and 80 keV (60 keV: 220.3 [29.6–1060] vs 219.5 [23.7/1048]; 80 keV: 152.0 [12.0/735.6] vs 142.5 [7.4/737.7]; P < 0.001). CACSVNI was closest to CACSTNC at 60 keV, QIR 2 (+0.1%) in the small; 55 keV, QIR 1 (±0%) in the medium; 55 keV, QIR 4 (−0.1%) in the large phantom; and at 60 keV, QIR 1 (−2.3%) in patients.ConclusionsVirtual monoenergetic imaging reconstructions have a significant impact on CACSVNI. The effects of different QIR levels are less consistent and seem to depend on several individual conditions, which should be further investigated.

Radiomics uses advanced image analysis to extract massive amounts of quantitative information from digital images, which is not otherwise distinguishable to the human eye. The mined data can be used to explore and establish new and undiscovered correlations between these imaging features and clinical end points. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is a first-line imaging modality for evaluating coronary artery disease and has a primary role in the assessment of cardiac structures. Conventional interpretation of cardiac CT images relies mostly on subjective and qualitative analysis, as well as basic geometric quantification. To date, some proof-of-concept studies have demonstrated the feasibility and diagnostic performance of cardiac CT radiomics analysis. This review describes the current literature on radiomics in cardiac CT and discusses its advantages, challenges, and future directions. Although much evidences are needed in this field, cardiac CT radiomics has a lot to offer to patients and physicians with potential to define cardiac disease phenotypes on imaging with higher precision.

No abstract

PurposeTo compare coronary artery calcium volume and score (CACS) between photon-counting detector (PCD) and conventional energy integrating detector (EID) computed tomography (CT) in a phantom and prospective patient study.MethodsA commercially available CACS phantom was scanned with a standard CACS protocol (120 kVp, slice thickness/increment 3/1.5 mm, and a quantitative Qr36 kernel), with filtered back projection on the EID-CT, and with monoenergetic reconstruction at 70 keV and quantum iterative reconstruction off on the PCD-CT. The same settings were used to prospectively acquire data in patients (n = 23, 65 ± 12.1 years), who underwent PCD- and EID-CT scans with a median of 5.5 (3.0–12.5) days between the two scans in the period from August 2021 to March 2022. CACS was quantified using a commercially available software solution. A regression formula was obtained from the aforementioned comparison and applied to simulate risk reclassification in a pre-existing cohort of 514 patients who underwent a cardiac EID-CT between January and December 2021.ResultsBased on the phantom experiment, CACSPCD–CT showed a more accurate measurement of the reference CAC volumes (overestimation of physical volumes: PCD-CT 66.1 ± 1.6% vs. EID-CT: 77.2 ± 0.5%). CACSEID–CT and CACSPCD–CT were strongly correlated, however, the latter measured significantly lower values in the phantom (CACSPCD–CT: 60.5 (30.2–170.3) vs CACSEID–CT 74.7 (34.6–180.8), p = 0.0015, r = 0.99, mean bias –9.7, Limits of Agreement (LoA) –36.6/17.3) and in patients (non-significant) (CACSPCD–CT: 174.3 (11.1–872.7) vs CACSEID–CT 218.2 (18.5–876.4), p = 0.10, r = 0.94, mean bias –41.1, LoA –315.3/232.5). The systematic lower measurements of Agatston score on PCD-CT system led to reclassification of 5.25% of our simulated patient cohort to a lower classification class.ConclusionCACSPCD–CT is feasible and correlates strongly with CACSEID–CT, however, leads to lower CACS values. PCD-CT may provide results that are more accurate for CACS than EID-CT.

Background: On the basis of the hypothesis that virtual noniodine (VNI)-based coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is feasible at reduced radiation doses, this study assesses the impact of radiation dose reduction on the accuracy of this VNI algorithm on a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. Methods: In a systematic in vitro setting, a phantom for CACS simulating three chest sizes was scanned on a clinical PCD-CT. The standard radiation dose was chosen at volumetric CT dose indices (CTDIVol) of 1.5, 3.3, 7.0 mGy for small, medium-sized, and large phantoms, and was gradually reduced by adjusting the tube current resulting in 100, 75, 50, and 25%, respectively. VNI images were reconstructed at 55 keV, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR)1, and at 60 keV/QIR4, and evaluated regarding image quality (image noise (IN), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)), and CACS. All VNI results were compared to true noncontrast (TNC)-based CACS at 70 keV and standard radiation dose (reference). Results: INTNC was significantly higher than INVNI, and INVNI at 55 keV/QIR1 higher than at 60 keV/QIR4 (100% dose: 16.7 ± 1.9 vs. 12.8 ± 1.7 vs. 7.7 ± 0.9; p < 0.001 for every radiation dose). CNRTNC was higher than CNRVNI, but it was better to use 60 keV/QIR4 (p < 0.001). CACSVNI showed strong correlation and agreement at every radiation dose (p < 0.001, r > 0.9, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The coefficients of the variation in root-mean squared error were less than 10% and thus clinically nonrelevant for the CACSVNI of every radiation dose. Conclusion: This phantom study suggests that CACSVNI is feasible on PCD-CT, even at reduced radiation dose while maintaining image quality and CACS accuracy.

No abstract

Background Evaluation for gastrointestinal leak is a frequent imaging indication, and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) with oral or rectally administered contrast can be used to improve efficiency and diagnostic confidence. Purpose To assess the value of the DECT iodine overlay (IO) reconstruction as a stand-alone image set compared to routine CT in assessing oral or rectal contrast leak from the gastrointestinal system. Material and Methods A blinded, retrospective audit study was performed by three readers who each interpreted 50 studies performed for assessment of oral or rectal contrast leak that were acquired using DECT. Each reader independently assessed both the routine CT images and the images of the reconstructed IO for contrast leak in random order with a six-week “wash-out period” between readings. Clinical follow-up provided the reference standard. Readers recorded the presence/absence of a leak, diagnostic confidence, image quality score, and interpretation time for each image set. Results Pooled data for overall accuracy in identification of a leak increased from 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.74–0.87) for routine CT to 0.91 (95% CI=0.85–0.95) with IO, and the area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher for IO than routine CT ( P = 0.015). Readers required significantly less time to interpret IO than routine CT (median improvement of 12.5 s per image using pooled data; P < 0.001) while maintaining diagnostic confidence and perceived image quality. Conclusion Use of DECT IO reconstructions for identification of oral or rectal contrast leak requires less time to interpret than routine CT with improved accuracy and maintained diagnostic confidence and perceived image quality.

No abstract