Indigenous chicken production system has long been characterised by low productivity due to among other factors, poor management, inadequate and poor feeding regime, poor (or lack) ISSN 2166-0379 2015 www.macrothink.org/jas 146 of disease control measures, poor hygiene, inappropriate housing, negative attitudes, lack of technical knowledge and lack of institutional support in terms of policy and infrastructure. This research was carried out to evaluate uptake by farmers of improved management practices (interventions) and their effect on performance of indigenous chickens at farm level and consequences for farmer participation in the implementation of research activities. The research involved 200 farmers in five regions in three counties. Four villages were selected per region and10 farms in each village. Interventions housing, feed supplementation, vaccination and deworming were implemented by farmers and monitoring and evaluation carried out. Farmers used own local inputs in implementing the project interventions and recorded various project activities and outputs. The project was monitored over a span of five, 3-months long periods. 25% of farmers in the entire five regions did not have housing as a treatment in any of 5 periods. Feed supplementation had high level of use by all farmers in each period. More farmers applied deworming in later periods, 25% had vaccination in period 1, and 40% in period 5. Periods 3 -5 generally seem to be the time most applications were done. Flock sizes rose from 10 -20 birds per farm to 20 -30. Farmer participatory research is a tool for technology testing and transfer and a quick and effective means of generating and disseminating information. Journal of Agricultural Studies
This study investigates characteristics of indigenous chicken farms categorised on flock size patterns identified in a research involving 200 farmers in five regions in three counties (Nyandarua, Laikipia, Nakuru) in Kenya. Four villages were selected per region and10 farms in each village. Training and sensitisation meetings, introduction of intervention options (Housing, Feed Supplementation, Vaccination and Deworming), implementation by farmers, and monitoring and evaluation were carried out. The farmers used own inputs in implementing the project interventions and recorded various project activities and outputs. The project was monitored over a span of five, 3-months long periods. Variation analysis was used to identify similarities and differences between 7 farm categories (groups) based on their differences on the levels of the following factors: (1) Average farm flock sizes at five different periods (2) Treatment characteristics (interventions) application -(housing, vaccination, de-worming, and supplementation) (3) Demography characteristics (total flock additions, total flock reductions, total unplanned reductions and total controlled reduction) and (4) Production characteristics (mean hatchability and egg production per hen per cycle based on predicted egg production). Results indicate there were significant differences between the groups. Almost all the flock size differences between farm groups were significant at 1 percent level. There was a rise in differences of the between and within groups mean squares from period 1 to 5 as a result of the flock sizes levels also increasing with period. The treatment characteristics application levels had little differences between groups but housing and feed supplementation had larger values than the other two characteristics. The treatments application differences not being significant could be a consequence of influence from the research team being more or less the same in all the farms. The demography characteristics, total addition and total reduction values were close to one another among the farm categories. These together with flock size levels had little influence from the research team but were mostly a reflection of individual farm's decision and activities. However, the production characteristics reflected more both the farmer's action and the hen potential. The group with the lowest flock size trends had production values close to those of other groups. This would suggest that low flock size level in a farm is not a reflection of poor production dynamics. The demographic characteristics differences between farms compare well with significant levels on flock size differences between farms shown earlier, especially the total additions, total reductions and total controlled reductions. There was no single significant difference among the groups on vaccination and production characteristics -mean hatchability and egg production. Production characteristics may have been more influenced by hen factors, which may not have been different among the d...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.