SLE is a clinically heterogeneous disease characterized by an unpredictable relapsing-remitting disease course. Although the etiology and mechanisms of SLE flares remain elusive, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation is implicated in SLE pathogenesis. This study examined the relationships between serological measures of EBV reactivation, disease activity, and interferon (IFN)-associated immune pathways in SLE patients. Sera from adult SLE patients (n = 175) and matched unaffected controls (n = 47) were collected and tested for antibodies against EBV-viral capsid antigen (EBV-VCA; IgG and IgA), EBV-early antigen (EBV-EA; IgG), cytomegalovirus (CMV; IgG), and herpes simplex virus (HSV-1; IgG). Serological evidence of EBV reactivation was more common in SLE patients compared to controls as demonstrated by seropositivity to EBV-EA IgG (39% vs 13%; p = 0.0011) and EBV-VCA IgA (37% vs 17%; p = 0.018). EBV-VCA, CMV1, and HSV-1 IgG seropositivity rates did not differ between SLE patients and controls. Furthermore, concentrations of EBV-VCA (IgG and IgA) and EBV-EA (IgG) were higher in SLE patients. SLE patients with high disease activity had increased concentrations of EBV-VCA IgA (mean ISR 1.34 vs. 0.97; p = 0.041) and EBV-EA IgG levels (mean ISR 1.38 vs. 0.90; p = 0.007) compared with those with lower disease activity. EBV reactivation was associated with enhanced levels of the IFN-associated molecule IP-10 (p < 0.001) and the soluble mediators BLyS (p < 0.001) and IL-10 (p = 0.0011). In addition, EBV-EA IgG responses were enriched in two previously defined patient clusters with robust expression of IFN and inflammatory or lymphoid and monocyte responses. Patients in these clusters were also more likely to have major organ involvement, such as renal disease. This study supports a possible role for EBV reactivation in SLE disease activity.
ObjectiveSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with varied morbidity and mortality. We assessed clinical presentations, autoantibody specificities and therapeutic interventions in Native American (NA) patients with SLE.MethodsPatients with SLE meeting 1997 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria (n=3148) were enrolled between 1992 and 2010 in the multiethnic, cross-sectional Lupus Family Registry and Repository. Clinical, demographic and therapeutic information were extracted from medical records using a standardised form and formalised training. Autoantibodies were assessed by indirect immunofluorescence (antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antidouble-stranded DNA), precipitin (ENA) and ELISA (IgG and IgM anticardiolipins).ResultsNA patients met SLE classification at a younger age (29.89±12.3 years) than European Americans (EA; 32.02±12.87, P=0.0157) and a similar age to African-Americans (AAs) and Hispanics (HIS). More NA patients had concurrent rheumatic diseases or symptoms, such as Raynaud’s phenomenon, interstitial lung disease, Sjӧgren’s syndrome and systemic sclerosis. Compared with EAs, NAs were more likely to have high-titre ANA (≥1:3240; P<0.0001) and had more SLE-associated autoantibodies. Autoantibodies with unknown specificities were more common in NAs (41%) compared with other racial/ethnic groups in this collection (AA: 24%, P=0.0006; EA: 17%, P<0.0001; HIS: 23%, P=0.0050). Fewer NA patients used hydroxychloroquine (68%) compared with others (AA: 74%, P=0.0308; EA: 79%, P=0.0001, HIS: 77%, P=0.0173); this was influenced by lower hydroxychloroquine use in NA patients from Latin America (32%). NA patients had higher rates of methotrexate use (28%) compared with AA (18%, P=0.0006) and HIS patients (14%, P=0.0003), higher azathioprine use (38%) compared with EA patients (30%, P=0.0105) and higher mycophenolate mofetil use (26%) compared with EA (17%, P=0.0012) and HIS patients (11%, P<0.0001).ConclusionsNA patients are diagnosed with SLE earlier in life and present worse concurrent rheumatic disease symptoms than EA patients. NA patients also are more likely to have expanded autoantibody profiles and precipitins of unknown specificities.
Objective Many Native American ( NA ) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus ( SLE ) do not exhibit the classical SLE autoantibody profiles of European American ( EA ) and African American ( AA ) patients with SLE . The poorer SLE disease outcomes noted in NA patients highlights a need for more equitable diagnostic and prognostic tools for NA patients with SLE . The objective was to identify informative autoantibody profiles for NA , AA , and EA patients with SLE using an expanded set of autoantigens. Methods Sera from 49 NA , 49 AA , and 49 EA age‐, sex‐, and antinuclear autoantibody titer–matched patients with SLE who met the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria and 10 ethnicity‐, sex‐, and age‐matched controls were tested for autoantibody reactivity by autoantigen microarrays. Autoantibodies that were significantly elevated in patients with SLE compared with ethnicity‐specific controls were selected for hierarchical clustering. Differences in clinical criteria between patient clusters were determined by Fisher's exact test and corrected for multiple comparisons. Results NA , AA , and EA patients with SLE each had a cluster distinguished by higher levels of anti‐Ro52 and another cluster distinguished by nucleic acid–specific autoantibodies. Additional clusters were distinguished in NA patients by elevated extracellular matrix autoantibodies and were distinguished in AA patients by elevated Sm/ RNP autoantibody and elevated nucleolin/histone autoantibody. Two EA patient clusters with similar nucleic acid– and Ro52‐specific autoantibodies were distinguished by either high or low histone 2A reactivity. Renal manifestations trended higher in the NA Ro52 cluster and were significantly enriched in the AA nucleolin/histone cluster. The AA nucleolin/histone cluster and EA H2A cluster had higher disease activity. Conclusion Expanded autoantibody profiles can identify informative subsets of patients with SLE .
ObjectivePatients with incomplete lupus erythematosus (ILE) have lupus features but insufficient criteria for SLE classification. Some patients with ILE transition to SLE, but most avoid major organ involvement. This study tested whether the milder disease course in ILE is influenced by reduced SLE risk allele genetic load.MethodsWe calculated the genetic load based on 99 SLE-associated risk alleles in European American patients with SLE (≥4 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria, n=170), patients with ILE (3 ACR 1997 criteria, n=169), a subset of patients with ILE not meeting Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification (ILESLICC, n=119) and healthy controls (n=133). Unweighted genetic loads were calculated as the total sum of risk alleles for each individual, while weighted genetic loads were defined as the sum of risk alleles multiplied by the natural logarithm of the previously published OR of each risk allele for SLE susceptibility.ResultsThe median unweighted and weighted SLE risk allele genetic load was significantly greater in patients with ILE (unweighted: 81, p value=0.01; weighted: 16.3, p value=0.001) and patients with SLE (80, p value=0.02; 16.29, p value=0.0006) compared with healthy controls (78, 15.76). Patients with ILESLICCtrended towards an increased genetic load, although not statistically significant (unweighted: 80, p value=0.14; weighted: 16.05, p value=0.07). However, the median genetic load did not significantly differ between ILE and SLE, and genetic load did not differentiate patients with ILE and SLE (area under the curve=0.51, p=0.78) by receiver operator characteristic analysis.ConclusionsPatients with ILE and SLE have comparable genetic loads of SLE risk loci, suggesting similar genetic predispositions between these conditions. Phenotypical differences between SLE and ILE may instead be influenced by ILE-specific variants and gene–environment interactions.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects 1 in 537 of African American (AA) women, which is >2-fold more than European American (EA) women. AA patients also develop the disease at a younger age, have more severe symptoms, and a greater chance of early mortality. We used a multi-omics approach to uncover ancestry-specific immune alterations in SLE patients and healthy controls that may contribute to disease disparities. Cell composition, signaling, and epigenetics were evaluated by mass cytometry; droplet-based single cell transcriptomics and paired proteogenomics (scRNA-Seq/scCITE-Seq). Soluble mediator levels were measured in plasma and stimulated whole blood. Toll-like receptor (TLRs) pathways are activated by vaccination and microbial infection, and are also key drivers of autoimmune disease. We observed enhanced TLR3/4/7/8/9-related gene expression in immune cells from AA versus EA SLE patients. TLR7/8/9 and IFNα phospho-signaling responses were heightened even in immune cells from healthy AA versus EA controls. TLR stimulation of healthy AA and EA immune cells recapitulated the distinct ancestry-associated SLE immunophenotypes. Thus, healthy individuals show ancestry-based differences in innate immune pathways that could influence the course and severity of lupus and other diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.