Absorption, translocation, and metabolism studies using 14C-quinclorac were conducted with quinclorac-sensitive Digitaria sanguinalis and quinclorac-tolerant Eleusine indica at the one- to two-tiller growth stage cultured under hydroponic conditions. After an 80-h exposure time, both species had absorbed nearly equal amounts of 14C-quinclorac (27 and 22% for D. sanguinalis and E. indica, respectively). Over the exposure period, the absorption curve for D. sanguinalis was curvilinear, with the maximum absorption occurring approximately 48 h after exposure. The response curve for E. indica was linear across the exposure period. Results from the translocation studies showed that 95% of the absorbed 14C-quinclorac remained in the treated leaf for D. sanguinalis after 80 h. However, only 58% of the absorbed 14C remained in the treated leaf of E. indica. Most of the 14C translocated out of the leaves moved to the tiller, the crown, and new leaf tissue. There was no appreciable exudation of 14C-quinclorac by either species during the absorption period. Results of the metabolism studies showed that neither the susceptible species (D. sanguinalis) nor the tolerant species (E. indica) metabolized the parent quinclorac herbicide. Spray retention studies showed that E. indica (tolerant) retained more applied quinclorac than D. sanguinalis (sensitive). Overall results suggested that a large difference in tolerance of the two species to quinclorac involves mechanisms other than absorption, metabolism, or spray retention.

Several commercial and experimental adjuvants were evaluated for efficacy in enhancing activity and selectivity of quinclorac in two cultivars of canola and four turfgrass species. Weed species investigated included cleavers, annual sowthistle, large crabgrass, and goosegrass. Turfgrass species evaluated included Kentucky bluegrass, perennial ryegrass, tall fescue, and creeping bentgrass. A variety of adjuvant types were selected, such as a methylated seed oil (Sunit II), a petroleum-based crop oil concentrate, the silicone-based Sylgard 309, a cationic fatty amine ethoxylate surfactant (Frigate), and modified crop oils (Dash and Merge). Adjuvant efficacy was evaluated by calculating the quinclorac rate required to reduce plant growth 50% (GR50) based on rates applied at 0, 15.6, 31.2, 62.5, and 125 g ai/ha. For goosegrass, quinclorac rates evaluated were increased to 250, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 g ai/ha. All evaluated adjuvants provided similar enhancement of control for cleavers and annual sowthistle. Sylgard 309 was the least effective adjuvant for control of large crabgrass. Goosegrass was tolerant to quinclorac across the evaluated rate range regardless of adjuvant; therefore, GR50 values could not be determined. None of the adjuvants alone caused phytotoxicity to canola or any turfgrass species.

Goosegrass is considered tolerant to quinclorac. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a stage of growth at which it was susceptible. Stage of growth studies with goosegrass were conducted that evaluated quinclorac activity at rates of 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 kg ai/ha applied with 1% (v/v) Merge spray adjuvant. Quinclorac application stages evaluated included preemergence and one- to two-leaf, four- to five-leaf, and one- to two-tiller stage. The effects of root uptake from postemergence applications were also evaluated by comparing treatments with and without a vermiculite soil barrier. Goosegrass was more susceptible to quinclorac when applied preemergence or early postemergence at the one- to two-leaf stage than at later more mature stages. The importance of root uptake on quinclorac activity was also observed, particularly at the four- to five-leaf stage, where the dose required to reduce growth 50% (GR50) in the absence of the soil barrier was 3.4 kg/ha vs. 16 kg/ha in the presence of a barrier. At the most advanced growth stage of one to two tillers, calculated GR50 values were greater than 16 kg/ha whether a soil barrier was present or not. The lowest calculated GR50 value of 2.7 kg/ha for the one- to two-leaf stage with no soil barrier was still approximately 3.5 times higher than the maximum labeled rate for turfgrass.

No abstract