Climbing fibers, the projections from the inferior olive to the cerebellar cortex, carry sensorimotor error and clock signals that trigger motor learning by controlling cerebellar Purkinje cell synaptic plasticity and discharge. Purkinje cells target the deep cerebellar nuclei, which are the output of the cerebellum and include an inhibitory GABAergic projection to the inferior olive. This pathway identifies a potential closed loop in the olivo-cortico-nuclear network. Therefore, sets of Purkinje cells may phasically control their own climbing fiber afferents. Here, using in vitro and in vivo recordings, we describe a genetically modified mouse model that allows the specific optogenetic control of Purkinje cell discharge. Tetrode recordings in the cerebellar nuclei demonstrate that focal stimulations of Purkinje cells strongly inhibit spatially restricted sets of cerebellar nuclear neurons. Strikingly, such stimulations trigger delayed climbing-fiber input signals in the stimulated Purkinje cells. Therefore, our results demonstrate that Purkinje cells phasically control the discharge of their own olivary afferents and thus might participate in the regulation of cerebellar motor learning.motor control | olivo-cerebellar loop | complex spikes T he cerebellar cortex is involved in a wealth of functions, from the control of posture to higher cognitive processes (1-3). Purkinje cells (PCs) are key processing units of the cerebellar cortex (4): each PC receives more than 175,000 parallel fiber synaptic inputs carrying information about the ongoing sensorymotor context. It also receives a single inferior olive afferent, the climbing fiber, which triggers a complex spike (CS), modulates PC firing (5), controls synaptic input plasticity, and has been proposed to carry error and clock signals to the cerebellum (2, 4-8). PCs are grouped in multiple parasagittal microzones, each receiving projections from separate areas of the inferior olive and projecting to subregions of the cerebellar nuclei (CN) (9-12). In the CN, PCs make inhibitory contacts on excitatory neurons that project to various premotor areas and propagate cerebellar computations to the motor system. Anatomical evidence indicates that PC terminals also contact CN inhibitory neurons that target inferior olive cells (13,14). This nucleoolivary pathway is topographically organized in multiple parallel projections to the inferior olive subnuclei (15), suggesting the existence of closed olivary-cortico-nuclear loops. Therefore, the discharge of a population of PCs in a microzone might not only shape the output of the cerebellum but also control its afferent climbing-fiber signal. Previous studies have shown that stimulation of the nucleo-olivary pathway significantly reduces olivary cell firing (16-18) and that pharmacological and genetic manipulations of PCs or olivary cell activity induce reciprocal modulations of the firing rate of PCs and climbing fibers (19, 20).These results indicate that PCs may tonically modulate the nucleo-olivary pathway. However, whether...

The lateral habenula (LHb) is an epithalamic structure connected with both the basal ganglia and the limbic system and that exerts a major influence on midbrain monoaminergic nuclei. The current view is that LHb receives and processes cortical information in order to select proper strategies in a variety of behavior. Recent evidence indicates that LHb might also be implicated in hippocampus-dependent memory processes. However, if and how LHb functionally interacts with the dorsal hippocampus (dHPC) is still unknown. We therefore performed simultaneous recordings within LHb and dHPC in both anesthetized and freely moving rats. We first showed that a subset of LHb cells were phase-locked to hippocampal theta oscillations. Furthermore, LHb generated spontaneous theta oscillatory activity, which was highly coherent with hippocampal theta oscillations. Using reversible LHb inactivation, we found that LHb might regulate dHPC theta oscillations. In addition, we showed that LHb silencing altered performance in a hippocampus-dependent spatial recognition task. Finally, increased coherence between LHb and dHPC was positively correlated to the memory performance in this test. Collectively, these results suggest that LHb functionally interacts with the hippocampus and is involved in hippocampus-dependent spatial information processing.