No abstract

Hearing loss is more frequent in HIV-infected patients compared with uninfected patients. Therefore, HIV-infected patients need special audiologic care. Further studies are needed because controversy remains regarding the factors that lead to ear damage.

In Quebec, Canada, eligibility for palivizumab (PVZ) immunoprophylaxis was expanded in fall 2016 to include healthy-full-term (HFT) infants residing in the circumpolar region of Nunavik and aged <3 months at the start of the RSV season or born during the season. This study assessed the effectiveness of PVZ to prevent RSV hospitalizations in these infants during the 3 seasons following its implementation. Medical and laboratory records of <1-year-old infants (375 average annual birth cohort) admitted to regional and tertiary hospitals with respiratory infection during 6 years were reviewed. Individual pharmacy data and birth registries were used to estimate adherence to PVZ and direct PVZ effectiveness in 0–5-month-old HFT infants by comparing the incidence of RSV hospitalizations 1) in protected and unprotected infants, and 2) during PVZ-protected and unprotected days. Over six seasons, the RSV hospitalization rate was 50.2/1000 (72.6/1000 adjusted for underdetection) in <1-year-old infants. PVZ was administered to 73% (469) of eligible HFT infants; 37% (237) received all recommended doses. Overall for the three RSV seasons the incidence of RSV hospitalization in PVZ-protected infants was similar to PVZ-unprotected infants, resulting in PVZ direct effectiveness of −6.7% (95% CI −174.8%, 85.6%). The incidence of RSV hospitalization during PVZ-protected and during PVZ-unprotected days was also similar, resulting in PVZ direct effectiveness of −3.8% (CI −167.6%, 64.9%). Over three RSV seasons, there was no evidence that PVZ reduced RSV hospitalizations in HFT Nunavik infants. In addition, the sub-optimal adherence to the recommended PVZ administration schedule suggests feasibility and acceptability issues.

Objectives(1) To assess if co-administration of four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) and other routine vaccines caused an interaction increasing the risk and/or severity of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) compared with administration at separate visits and (2) to estimate the risk of AEFI recurrence.DesignRisk-interval designSettingThree randomised controlled trials conducted in Europe.ParticipantsA total of 5026 healthy 2-month-old to 15-month-old infants.Interventions4CMenB and routine vaccines (hexavalent combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio-Haemophilus influenzae type b-hepatitis B vaccine+seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine) administered concomitantly or separately 1 month apart, in regular (2, 4, 6 and 12 months), accelerated (2, 3, 4 and 12 months) or delayed (two doses of 4CMenB at ≥12 months of age) schedules.Outcome measuresPrimary: Fever (≥38°C) during the first 48 hours post immunisation. Secondary: crying, change in eating habits, diarrhoea, irritability and tenderness at the 4CMenB injection site.ResultsCompared with separate administration, concomitant administration decreased the overall incidence of fever (≥38°C), 86% versus 75%, and other systemic AEFIs but increased the incidence of 4CMenB injection site tenderness, 55% versus 66%, moderate/severe fevers (≥39°C), 13% versus 18%, and long-lasting (>1 day) fevers, 23% versus 33%. Co-administration reduced AEFI risk by 4%–49% with the greatest impact among infants with prior AEFI(s). Fever recurrence risk was proportional to the number of prior fever events: 79% at dose 2 with one prior episode; 44% and 74% at dose 3 with one and two prior episodes, respectively; and 29%, 45% and 60% at dose 4 with one, two and three prior episodes, respectively. Severity was not increased at recurrence and a similar pattern of recurrence risk proportional to the number of prior events was observed for other AEFIs.ConclusionsThe cumulative risk of AEFI is reduced with concomitant versus separate administration of 4CMenB and routine infant vaccines. Infants with a prior AEFI are at higher risk of the same AEFI at subsequent immunisations, but severity with recurrence is usually not increased.Trials registration numberNCT00657709,NCT00847145,NCT00721396andNCT02712177; Pre-results.

Despite vaccines being administered to millions of people annually, there are few studies in which researchers evaluated AEFI recurrence. Published studies suggest that reimmunization is usually safe. However in these studies, severe cases were often not reimmunized.