Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are important prognostic and predictive biomarkers in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer. Incorporating sTILs into clinical practice necessitates reproducible assessment. Previously developed standardized scoring guidelines have been widely embraced by the clinical and research communities. We evaluated sources of variability in sTIL assessment by pathologists in three previous sTIL ring studies. We identify common challenges and evaluate impact of discrepancies on outcome estimates in early TNBC using a newly-developed prognostic tool. Discordant sTIL assessment is driven by heterogeneity in lymphocyte distribution. Additional factors include: technical slide-related issues; scoring outside the tumor boundary; tumors with minimal assessable stroma; including lymphocytes associated with other structures; and including other inflammatory cells. Small variations in sTIL assessment modestly alter risk estimation in early TNBC but have the potential to affect treatment selection if cutpoints are employed. Scoring and averaging multiple areas, as well as use of reference images, improve consistency of sTIL evaluation. Moreover, to assist in avoiding the pitfalls identified in this analysis, we developed an educational resource available at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org/pitfalls.

The advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in modern oncology has significantly improved survival in several cancer settings. A subgroup of women with breast cancer (BC) has immunogenic infiltration of lymphocytes with expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). These patients may potentially benefit from ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 signaling axis. The use of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as predictive and prognostic biomarkers has been under intense examination. Emerging data suggest that TILs are associated with response to both cytotoxic treatments and immunotherapy, particularly for patients with triple-negative BC. In this review from The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group, we discuss (a) the biological understanding of TILs, (b) their analytical and clinical validity and efforts toward the clinical utility in BC, and (c) the current status of PD-L1 and TIL testing across different continents, including experiences from low-to-middle-income countries, incorporating also the view of a patient advocate. This information will help set the stage for future approaches to optimize the understanding and clinical utilization of TIL analysis in patients with BC.

3511 Background: The combination of PD-1 and CTLA4 blockade has changed the treatment landscape for several cancer types. Although this treatment is highly effective in metastatic mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancers, metastatic MMR-proficient (pMMR) tumors do not respond. The NICHE study was the first neoadjuvant immunotherapy study in colon cancer (CC) to show impressive responses in 100% of dMMR ( n= 20) and 27% of pMMR ( n= 15) CC. In contrast, pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using standard of care folfox is approximately 5% in dMMR tumors. Here we present the final efficacy data for the original NICHE study cohorts. Methods: Patients with non-metastatic, resectable dMMR or pMMR CC were treated with a single dose of ipilimumab 1mg/kg and two doses of nivolumab 3mg/kg and underwent surgery within 6 weeks. In addition, patients with pMMR tumors were randomized to receive celecoxib. The primary endpoints were safety and feasibility, and secondary endpoints included pathologic response rate and disease-free survival in 30 patients with dMMR and 30 with pMMR tumors. Pathologic response was defined as 50% or less viable tumor rest (VTR), and major pathologic response (MPR) as <10% VTR. Results: Thirty patients with pMMR and 32 with dMMR tumors were evaluable for the efficacy analyses. In the pMMR cohort, pathologic response was observed in 9/30 (30%, 95% CI 14-46%) patients, consisting of 7 MPR (including 3 pathologic complete responses {pCR}) and 2 partial responses. Four out of 9 pMMR responders had received celecoxib. Five patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 12-35 months), 3 patients (all non-responders) in the pMMR group had disease recurrence. In the 32 patients with dMMR tumors, pathologic response was observed in 100% of patients, with 31/32 MPR (97%, 95% CI 91-100%) and one partial response. Pathologic complete response was observed in 22/32 (69%, 95% CI 53-85%) patients. None of the patients in the dMMR cohort had disease recurrence. Surgery was delayed in one patient with a pMMR tumor due to myositis. Grade 3 immune-related adverse events were observed in 12% of patients, consistent with our previous report on the primary endpoint. There were no grade 4 immune-related AEs nor unexpected surgical complications. Conclusions: These data confirm our previously published results of the NICHE study, with responses to neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 30% of pMMR and 100% of dMMR CC in the completed original cohorts. Validation of the dMMR responses in a large group of dMMR patients is ongoing and has the potential to change current practice. Clinical trial information: NCT03026140.

BackgroundReasons for poor guideline adherence in acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in children in high-income countries are unclear, but may be due to inconsistency between guideline recommendations, lack of evidence, and lack of generalizability of the recommendations to general practice. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of international guidelines on AGE in children and investigate the generalizability of the recommendations to general practice.MethodsGuidelines were retrieved from websites of professional medical organisations and websites of institutes involved in guideline development. In addition, a systematic search of the literature was performed. Articles were selected if they were a guideline, consensus statement or care protocol.ResultsEight guidelines met the inclusion criteria, the quality of the guidelines varied. 242 recommendations on diagnosis and management were found, of which 138 (57%) were based on evidence.There is a large variety in the classification of symptoms to different categories of dehydration. No signs are generalizable to general practice.It is consistently recommended to use hypo-osmolar ORS, however, the recommendations on ORS-dosage are not evidence based and are inconsistent. One of 14 evidence based recommendations on therapy of AGE is based on outpatient research and is therefore generalizable to general practice.ConclusionsThe present study shows considerable variation in the quality of guidelines on AGE in children, as well as inconsistencies between the recommendations. It remains unclear how to asses the extent of dehydration and determine the preferred treatment or referral of a young child with AGE presenting in general practice.

Removal of colorectal adenomas is an effective strategy to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates. However, as only a minority of adenomas progress to cancer, such strategies may lead to overtreatment. The present study aimed to characterize adenomas by in‐depth molecular profiling, to obtain insights into altered biology associated with the colorectal adenoma‐to‐carcinoma progression. We obtained low‐coverage whole genome sequencing, RNA sequencing and tandem mass spectrometry data for 30 CRCs, 30 adenomas and 18 normal adjacent colon samples. These data were used for DNA copy number aberrations profiling, differential expression, gene set enrichment and gene‐dosage effect analysis. Protein expression was independently validated by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays and in patient‐derived colorectal adenoma organoids. Stroma percentage was determined by digital image analysis of tissue sections. Twenty‐four out of 30 adenomas could be unambiguously classified as high risk (n = 9) or low risk (n = 15) of progressing to cancer, based on DNA copy number profiles. Biological processes more prevalent in high‐risk than low‐risk adenomas were related to proliferation, tumor microenvironment and Notch, Wnt, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Hedgehog signaling, while metabolic processes and protein secretion were enriched in low‐risk adenomas. DNA copy number driven gene‐dosage effect in high‐risk adenomas and cancers was observed for POFUT1, RPRD1B and EIF6. Increased POFUT1 expression in high‐risk adenomas was validated in tissue samples and organoids. High POFUT1 expression was also associated with Notch signaling enrichment and with decreased goblet cells differentiation. In‐depth molecular characterization of colorectal adenomas revealed POFUT1 and Notch signaling as potential drivers of tumor progression.

No abstract

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). To incorporate sTILs into clinical trials and diagnostics, reliable assessment is essential. In this review, we propose a new concept, namely the implementation of a risk-management framework that enables the use of sTILs as a stratification factor in clinical trials. We present the design of a biomarker risk-mitigation workflow that can be applied to any biomarker incorporation in clinical trials. We demonstrate the implementation of this concept using sTILs as an integral biomarker in a single-center phase II immunotherapy trial for metastatic TNBC (TONIC trial, NCT02499367), using this workflow to mitigate risks of suboptimal inclusion of sTILs in this specific trial. In this review, we demonstrate that a web-based scoring platform can mitigate potential risk factors when including sTILs in clinical trials, and we argue that this framework can be applied for any future biomarker-driven clinical trial setting.

4059 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade improves clinical outcomes for patients with gastric and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, but its efficacy and impact on the tumor microenvironment in non-metastatic, resectable disease remains largely unknown. Peri-operative FLOT, the current standard-of-care, leads to pathologic complete responses (pCR) and major pathologic responses (MPR) in 16% and 37% of patients, respectively. An important open question is whether PDL-1 blockade monotherapy can prime the tumor microenvironment in a favorable manner, prior to combination with chemotherapy. Methods: We report results from the phase 2 PANDA trial (NCT03448835) of neoadjuvant atezolizumab (anti-PDL-1) plus docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (DOC) in patients with resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Patients received a single cycle of atezolizumab monotherapy, followed by 4 cycles of atezolizumab+DOC. Tumor tissue was collected at baseline, after atezolizumab monotherapy, the first atezolizumab+DOC, and at resection. The primary endpoints were safety and feasibility in 20 patients, and secondary endpoints included MPR (<10% viable tumor rest) and disease-free survival. Results: Twenty patients, of which 18 with mismatch repair (MMR) proficient and two with MMR-deficient tumors, were evaluable for safety and efficacy analyses. MPR was observed in 14/20 patients (70%; 95% CI 46–88%), including 9 pCR (45%; 95% CI 23-68%). Among patients with intestinal type adenocarcinoma, 12/15 (80%; 95% CI 52-96%) had an MPR, with 9/15 (60%; 95% CI 32-84%) pCR. Treatment was well tolerated, with two patients (10%) experiencing a grade 3 immune adverse event. At a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 16-34), 15 patients (75%) were alive and disease-free. None of the patients with an MPR recurred. All patients underwent resections without treatment-related delays and no unexpected surgical complications were documented. Translational analyses, including baseline PDL-1 CPS score and whole exome sequencing (WES), plus CD8 T-cell infiltration and RNA sequencing at 4 timepoints will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Our data show that the addition of atezolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy leads to promising pathologic responses in gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, which appears to be higher than in historical controls, with no recurrences in responders. These data should be validated in a large randomized controlled trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03448835.