1585 Background: While aNSCLC is a leading cause of US cancer deaths, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have emerged as important new treatment options for these pts NCCN guidelines recommend testing of eight genes in aNSCLC patients at diagnosis. Targetable alterations (TA) in four genes, EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF, are associated with FDA-approved therapies. The labels for ICPis indicate that pts with TAs in EGFR and ALK are not candidates for first line treatment with ICPi. Methods: The Integra Connect database, which includes electronic medical record (EMR) and claims data on approximately 600,000 cancer patients, was queried across five community oncology practices (289 oncologists) to identify aNSCLC patients (stage 3B or 4) treated since January 2017. Manual review of charts was done to abstract tumor type/stage, drug regimens, and evidence of somatic genetic testing. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test difference in time to results (TTR) for blood- vs tissue-based tests. Results: A total of 1,203 aNSCLC patients were identified. Testing rates varied from 54% for EGFR to 22% for all 4 genes (table). 163 patients had a TA in EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or BRAF, and 55% of these pts did not receive targeted therapy. 84 pts with TA’s in EGFR or ALK had no evidence of progression on targeted therapy, yet 31 (37%) received an ICPi; 24% had the TA test result prior to ICPi use and 13% received the TA result after starting ICPi. Median TTR for blood-based somatic tests was shorter than tissue-based tests (4 vs 14 days, p-value= 3.5-e07). Conclusions: Our analysis in the community oncology setting for aNSCLC pts finds evidence of underutilization of genomic testing, underutilization of targeted therapies, and ICPi use outside of label. Further research is needed to identify strategies to increase testing in aNSCLC pts to provide physicians with the information needed to make optimal treatment decisions. [Table: see text]
The evaluation of bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) by conventional radiology has low reproducibility. In the last decade, several serum and urine biochemical parameters, for evaluation of bone turnover, have become available. The present study was designed to explore the value of six bone remodelation markers. It was studied in a series of 176 newly diagnosed patients with monoclonal gammopathies (107 MM and 69 monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance (MGUS)). As control groups we used 25 patients with benign osteoporosis (BO) and 32 healthy individuals (HI). The bone markers analyzed included: bone resorption markers (BRM) (total pyridinoline, total deoxypyridinoline, free deoxypyridinoline and C-terminal telopeptide of collagen I) and bone formation markers (BFM) (bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP) and osteocalcin (OC)). Serum or urinary levels of BRM were significantly higher in MM patients than in MGUS patients, BO patients or HI (P < 0.001, respectively). BRM were higher in MM patients with lytic lesions. However, only C-terminal telopeptide discriminated MM patients without bone lesions from MGUS patients. BFM did not show significant differences in the aforementioned comparisons, although a trend toward higher values of OC and lower values of bAP in patients with early bone affectation was observed. Ratios BRM/BFM that contained bAP exhibited differences that were most significant between the MM group and other entities, as well as between the different MM subgroups. In fact, the ratios BRM/bAP provided discrimination between the MM subgroup without lyses and MGUS group (P < 0.01). BRM and BFM, especially the ratios, are useful in the evaluation of bone lesions in patients with monoclonal gammopathies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.