Background
Takotsubo syndrome (
TTS
) is an acute reversible heart condition initially believed to represent a benign pathology attributable to its self‐limiting clinical course; however, little is known about its prognosis based on different triggers. This study compared short‐ and long‐term outcomes between
TTS
based on different triggers, focusing on various physical triggering events.
Methods and Results
We analyzed patients with a definitive
TTS
diagnosis recruited for the Spanish National Registry on
TTS
(RETAKO [Registry on Takotsubo Syndrome]). Short‐ and long‐term outcomes were compared between different groups according to triggering factors. A total of 939 patients were included. An emotional trigger was detected in 340 patients (36.2%), a physical trigger in 293 patients (31.2%), and none could be identified in 306 patients (32.6%). The main physical triggers observed were infections (30.7%), followed by surgical procedures (22.5%), physical activities (18.4%), episodes of severe hypoxia (18.4%), and neurological events (9.9%).
TTS
triggered by physical factors showed higher mortality in the short and long term, and within this group, patients whose physical trigger was hypoxia were those who had a worse prognosis, in addition to being triggered by physical factors, including age >70 years, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular eyection fraction <30% and shock on admission, and increased long‐term mortality risk.
Conclusions
TTS
triggered by physical factors could present a worse prognosis in terms of mortality. Under the
TTS
label, there could be as yet undiscovered very different clinical profiles, whose differentiation could lead to individual better management, and therefore the perception of
TTS
as having a benign prognosis should be generally ruled out.
Cancer has a non-negligible prevalence in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with a major risk of cardiovascular events and bleedings. Moreover, these patients are often undertreated from clinical despite medical therapy seems to be protective. Registration:The BleeMACS project (NCT02466854).
Acute coronary syndromes constitute a variety of myocardial injury presentations that include a subset of patients presenting with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). This acute coronary syndrome differs from type 1 myocardial infarction (MI) regarding patient characteristics, presentation, physiopathology, management, treatment, and prognosis. Two-thirds of MINOCA subjects present ST-segment elevation; MINOCA patients are younger, are more often female and tend to have fewer cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, MINOCA is a working diagnosis, and defining the aetiologic mechanism is relevant because it affects patient care and prognosis. In the absence of relevant coronary artery disease, myocardial ischaemia might be triggered by an acute event in epicardial coronary arteries, coronary microcirculation, or both. Epicardial causes of MINOCA include coronary plaque disruption, coronary dissection, and coronary spasm. Microvascular MINOCA mechanisms involve microvascular coronary spasm, takotsubo syndrome (TTS), myocarditis, and coronary thromboembolism. Coronary angiography with non-significant coronary stenosis and left ventriculography are first-line tests in the differential study of MINOCA patients. The diagnostic arsenal includes invasive and non-invasive techniques. Medical history and echocardiography can help indicate vasospasm or thrombosis, if one finite coronary territory is affected, or specify TTS if apical ballooning is present. Intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and provocative testing are encouraged. Cardiac magnetic resonance is a cornerstone in myocarditis diagnosis. MINOCA is not a benign diagnosis, and its polymorphic forms differ in prognosis. MINOCA care varies across centres, and future multi-centre clinical trials with standardized criteria may have a positive impact on defining optimal cardiovascular care for MINOCA patients.
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of anaemia and its influence on mortality among hospitalised patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) with preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVSF). Method and results: 210 patients with preserved LVSF admitted to the cardiology department of a tertiary hospital for CHF between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2002 were analysed. Anaemic patients, who constituted 46% of the whole group, were older (75 v 72 years, p = 0.036); were in hospital longer (mean (SD) 13 v 11 days, p = 0.007); had a higher prevalence of ischaemic heart disease (54% v 35%, p = 0.009), left bundle branch block (12% v 4%, p = 0.018), and kidney failure (56% v 34%, p = 0.003); and had faster erythrocyte sedimentation rates (mean (SD) 50 v 26 mm in the first hour, p , 0.001), a tendency to lower serum cholesterol concentration (mean (SD) 4.65 v 5.22 mmol/l, p = 0.073), and smaller body mass index (mean (SD) 27 v 29 kg/m 2 , p = 0.126) than their nonanaemic counterparts. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the anaemic group to have significantly poorer survival (p = 0.0001), with a one year survival rate of 72.2% versus 90.5% in the non-anaemic group. Multivariate analysis showed anaemia to be the most powerful independent predictor of mortality, increasing the risk of death by a factor of 2.7 (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Anaemia is a very prevalent condition in hospitalised patients with CHF with preserved LVSF and is independently associated with higher mortality. Appropriately designed randomised studies are needed to determine whether the prevention or treatment of anaemia can improve survival of these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.