In Mexico's territory, the center of origin and domestication of maize (Zea mays), there is a large phenotypic diversity of this crop. This diversity has been classified into “landraces.” Previous studies have reported that genomic variation in Mexican maize is better explained by environmental factors, particularly those related with altitude, than by landrace. Still, landraces are extensively used by agronomists, who recognize them as stable and discriminatory categories for the classification of samples. In order to investigate the genomic foundation of maize landraces, we analyzed genomic data (35,909 SNPs from Illumina MaizeSNP50 BeadChip) obtained from 50 samples representing five maize landraces (Comiteco, Conejo, Tehua, Zapalote Grande, and Zapalote Chico), and searched for markers suitable for landrace assignment. Landrace clusters could not be identified taking all the genomic information, but they become manifest taking only a subset of SNPs with high FST among landraces. Discriminant analysis of principal components was conducted to classify samples using SNP data. Two classification analyses were done, first classifying samples by landrace and then by altitude category. Through this classification method, we identified 20 landrace-informative SNPs and 14 altitude-informative SNPs, with only 6 SNPs in common for both analyses. These results show that Mexican maize phenotypic diversity can be classified in landraces using a small number of genomic markers, given the fact that landrace genomic diversity is influenced by environmental factors as well as artificial selection due to bio-cultural practices.
Gene essentiality estimation is a popular empirical approach to link genotypes to phenotypes. In humans, essentiality is estimated based on loss-of-function (LoF) mutation intolerance, either from population exome sequencing (in vivo) data or CRISPR-based in vitro perturbation experiments. Both approaches identify genes presumed to have detrimental consequences on the organism upon mutation. Are these genes constrained by having key cellular/organismal roles? Do in vivo and in vitro estimations equally recover these constraints? Insights into these questions have important implications in generalizing observations from cell models and interpreting disease risk genes. To empirically address these questions, we integrate genome-scale datasets and compare structural, functional and evolutionary features of essential genes versus genes with extremely high mutational tolerance. We found that essentiality estimates do recover functional constraints. However, the organismal or cellular context of estimation leads to functionally contrasting properties underlying the constraint. Our results suggest that depletion of LoF mutations in human populations effectively captures organismal-level functional constraints not experimentally accessible through CRISPR-based screens. Finally, we identify a set of genes (OrgEssential), which are mutationally intolerant in vivo but highly tolerant in vitro. These genes drive observed functional constraint differences and have an unexpected preference for nervous system expression.
Network biology aims to understand cell behavior through the analysis of underlying complex biomolecular networks. Inference of condition-specific interaction networks from epigenomic data enables the characterization of the structural plasticity that regulatory networks can acquire in different tissues of the same organism. From this perspective, uncovering specific patterns of variation by comparing network structure among tissues could provide insights into systems-level mechanisms underlying cell behavior. Following this idea, here we propose an empirical framework to analyze mammalian tissue-specific networks, focusing on characterizing and contrasting their structure and behavior in response to perturbations. We structurally represent the state of the cell/tissue by condition specific transcription factor networks generated using DNase-seq chromatin accessibility data, and we profile their systems behavior in terms of the structural robustness against random and directed perturbations. Using this framework, we unveil the structural heterogeneity existing among tissues at different levels of differentiation. We uncover a novel and conserved systems property of regulatory networks underlying embryonic stem cells (ESCs): in contrast to terminally differentiated tissues, the promiscuous regulatory connectivity of ESCs produces a globally homogeneous network resulting in increased structural robustness. We show that this property is associated with a more permissive, less restrictive chromatin accesibility state in ESCs. Possible biological consequences of this property are discussed.
Network biology aims to understand cell behavior through the analysis of underlying complex biomolecular networks. Inference of condition-specific interaction networks from epigenomic data enables the characterization of the structural plasticity that regulatory networks can acquire in different tissues of the same organism. From this perspective, uncovering specific patterns of variation by comparing network structure among tissues could provide insights into systems-level mechanisms underlying cell behavior. Following this idea, here we propose an empirical framework to analyze mammalian tissue-specific networks, focusing on characterizing and contrasting their structure and behavior in response to perturbations. We structurally represent the state of the cell/tissue by condition specific transcription factor networks generated using chromatin accessibility data, and we profile their systems behavior in terms of the structural robustness against random and directed perturbations. Using this framework, we unveil the structural heterogeneity existing among tissues at different levels of differentiation. We uncover a novel and conserved systems property of regulatory networks underlying embryonic stem cells (ESCs): in contrast to terminally differentiated tissues, the promiscuous regulatory connectivity of ESCs produces a globally homogeneous network resulting in increased structural robustness. Possible biological consequences of this property are discussed.
Gene essentiality estimation is a popular empirical approach to link genotypes to phenotypes. In humans, essentiality is estimated based on loss-of-function (LoF) mutation intolerance, either from population exome sequencing (in vivo) data or CRISPR-based in vitro perturbation experiments. Both approaches identify genes presumed to have strong detrimental consequences on the organism upon mutation. Are these genes functionally distinct and constrained by having key roles? Do in vivo and in vitro estimations equally recover these constraints? To address these questions, here we integrated disparate genome-scale datasets and compared structural, functional, and evolutionary features of essential genes versus genes with extremely high mutational tolerance and proteome expectation. We found that essentiality estimates do recover functional constraints. However, the organismal or cellular context of estimation leads to functionally contrasting properties underlying the constraint. Our results suggest that depletion of LoF mutations in human populations effectively captures developmental, organismal-level functional constraints not experimentally accessible through CRISPR-based screens. Finally, we identify a new set of genes (OrgEssential), which are intolerant of LoF mutation in vivo but highly tolerant in vitro. These genes drive observed functional constraint differences and have an unexpected preference for nervous system expression.
The epigenetic landscape concept initially proposed by Conrad H. Waddington has become a powerful tool to quantitatively address constraints underlying cell differentiation and morphogenesis. In theoretical and experimental terms, this has been enabled by grounding gene regulatory network models on experimental data. Such models have, in turn, led to proposing epigenetic landscape models that entail functional and structural constraints of cell differentiation and morphogenetic dynamics, and thus the understanding of development from a systems–based perspective. Therefore, it is mainly in the context of the study of development where the epigenetic landscape has been anchored as a conceptual support. On the other hand, nonetheless, given the recent understanding of gene control by epigenomic modifications and the capacity to profile these modifications using high– throughput molecular techniques, the notion of epigenetics has been mainly related to non-genetic heritable modifications of the genome. Therefore, this approach, which until now has not been based on a systems–based dynamical treatment, has given proximal epigenomic modifications a central role in understanding development. The latter, has left the dynamic view of epigenetic landscape aside. In this paper we aim at establishing a conceptual link between both conceptualizations of epigenetic regulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.