We evaluated the relationship between the acute phase and the development of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and the outcome of renal transplant in patients with Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (Stx-HUS). A 20-year retrospective study was performed of 66 renal transplants in 62 patients with Stx-HUS compared with 189 renal allografts in 178 children with other diseases. Of 62 patients, 61 had >7 days of oliguria during the acute phase. Stx-HUS patient survival was not different from controls (92% vs. 83% 15 years after renal transplantation). In the cyclosporine (CsA) era, survival of grafts from living related (LRD) and cadaver (CD) donors in Stx-HUS and control patients was 83% versus 70% ( P<0.03) and 77% versus 49% ( P<0.05) at 10 years. Graft survival in Stx-HUS and dysplasia/obstructive uropathy patients was 79% versus 76% ( P=NS), but it was different from that of other diseases (79% vs. 58%, P<0.001). There was no clinical or histopathological evidence of Stx-HUS recurrence. In conclusion, in Stx-HUS patients the duration of the acute oliguric period was a good predictor for the progression to ESRD. Use of CsA and the absence of recurrence of the disease influenced the excellent prognosis in Stx-HUS patients after renal transplantation. The development of ESRD in Stx-HUS could be mediated by non-immunological factors.
MMF has been shown to decrease the incidence of acute rejection in children and adults at 1 and 3 yr. Other beneficial effects of MMF have been more difficult to demonstrate. Our open‐labeled study presents a 5‐yr data for patients and graft survival, allograft function, and growth in MMF‐treated patients. The trial included 29 patients who were treated with MMF in combination with cyclosporine and methylprednisone. Patients were compared with a preceding group of 29 patients treated with AZA instead of MMF. Patient and graft survival rate 5 yr after transplantation were 97 and 90% in the MMF group vs. 93 and 83% in the AZA group (p: NS). Acute rejection was 20.6% in the MMF group vs. 58.6% in the AZA group (p < 0.01). Chronic rejection was 10.3% in the MMF group and 25% in the AZA group (p: NS). The changes in the creatinine clearance from baseline to 5 yr (Δ) were different between groups (−6.0 ± 5.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the MMF group vs. −22.2 ± 7.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the AZA group, p < 0.05). Also, the slope of 1/Scr showed a significant lower incidence of worsening renal function after the second year of renal transplantation (p < 0.0001) in the MMF group compared with the AZA group. Δ Height SDS in prepubertal patients was 0.3 ± 0.4 SDS in the MMF group vs. −0.8 ± 0.2 SDS in the AZA group (p < 0.05).
This study shows that long‐term MMF therapy has resulted in a decrease in acute rejection and was associated with a protection against renal function deterioration. The use of MMF enables a reduction in the dose of steroids and leads to a linear growth improvement of children after renal transplantation.
Klebsiella pneumoniae invasive syndrome (KPIS) is a rare clinical condition characterized by primary liver abscess associated with metastatic infection. Most case reports are from Southeast Asia, with only one case described in Portugal. The Authors present the case of a 44-year-old man with a history of fever, dry cough and cervicalgia. A thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan showed multiple pulmonary and hepatic nodules, suggestive of metastatic malignancy. Both blood cultures and bronchoalveolar lavage were positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae. Imaging studies were repeated during his hospital stay, showing a reduction in both number and volume of identified lesions, thus revealing their infectious nature. This case illustrates how much this entity can mimic other illnesses.LEARNING POINTSKlebsiella pneumoniae invasive syndrome is emerging as a global disease.The imaging-led diagnosis of neoplasia was proved incorrect and could have been deleterious for the patient.The lack of diagnostic suspicion can lead to shorter antibiotic treatment regimens, therefore compromising the patient’s full recovery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.