It is well-known that effective requirements analysis plays a crucial role in the quality of software systems. However, the scattered and tangled nature of certain system's concerns can hinder the proper understanding and treatment of import requirements. A key goal of prominent Aspect-Oriented Requirement Engineering (AORE) techniques, such as EA-Miner and Theme/Doc, is to support the automatic identification of crosscutting concerns at textual requirements documents. However, it is still unknown whether and which of these approaches produce accurate results in large text documents and according to the software engineers' expectations. In this context, this paper presents an analysis regarding the accuracy of the aforementioned AORE approaches when processing requirements of two industry software systems. Around 300 pages of requirements descriptions in these systems were the target of our investigation. In general, EA-Miner suffered more than Theme/Doc from the incompleteness and inconsistencies of requirements documents. In addition, other factors can differently influence each approach's accuracy, such as: the participation of requirements engineers, and the level of details provided in the requirements document.
This paper presents the comparison of the results of two models for the personalization of learning resources sequences in a Massive Online Open Course (MOOC). The compared models are very similar and differ just in the way how they recommend the learning resource sequences to each participant of the MOOC. In the first model, Case Based Reasoning (CBR) and Euclidean distance is used to recommend learning resource sequences that were successful in the past, while in the second model, the Q-Learning algorithm of Reinforcement Learning is used to recommend optimal learning resource sequences. The design of the learning resources is based on the flow theory considering dimensions as knowledge level of the student versus complexity level of the learning resource with the aim of avoiding the problems of anxiety or boredom during the learning process of the MOOC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.