No abstract

Background: Evidence-based international expert consensus regarding anaesthetic practice in hip/knee arthroplasty surgery is needed for improved healthcare outcomes. Methods: The International Consensus on Anaesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery group (ICAROS) systematic review, including randomised controlled and observational studies comparing neuraxial to general anaesthesia regarding major complications, including mortality, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, genitourinary, thromboembolic, neurological, infectious, and bleeding complications. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, from 1946 to May 17, 2018 were queried. Meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was utilised to assess evidence quality and to develop recommendations. Results: The analysis of 94 studies revealed that neuraxial anaesthesia was associated with lower odds or no difference in virtually all reported complications, except for urinary retention. Excerpt of complications for neuraxial vs general anaesthesia in hip/knee arthroplasty, respectively: mortality odds ratio (OR): 0.

Regional anesthesia and pain management have experienced advances in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. The erector spinae plane block is one of the newest techniques to be described. In the past two years, publications referring to ESP block have increased significantly. The objective of this review is to analyze the articles about ESP block that have been published to date. We performed a search in the main databases and identified 368 articles. After a selection of the relevant articles, 125 studies were found eligible and were included in the review. The ESP block is performed by depositing the local anesthetic in the fascial plane, deeper than the erector spinae muscle at the tip of the transverse process of the vertebra. Many cases of its use have been described with satisfactory results in the treatment of both acute pain and chronic pain. The applicability of the technique covers many clinical scenarios. Of the 98 case reports reviewed, 12 and 87 articles, respectively described the technique as a treatment for chronic pain and acute pain. The single-shot was the most frequently used technique. As described in the articles published to date, the technique is easy to perform and has a low rate of complications. However, despite the effectiveness of the technique, further studies are necessary to obtain more evidence of its actions.

High-level evidence is not yet available to guide dosage of LA used in regional blocks in children. The ASRA/ESRA recommendations intend to provide guidance in order to reduce the large variability of LA dosage currently observed in clinical practice.

Surveys evaluating pain in hospitals keep on showing that postoperative pain (POP) remains undertreated. At the time when guidelines are edited and organisational changes are implemented, more recent data are necessary to check the impact of these measures on daily practice and needs for improvement. This prospective, cross-sectional, observational, multi-centre practice survey was performed in 2004-2005 in 7 European countries. It was conducted in surgical wards of a randomised sample of hospitals. Data on POP management practices following surgery in adult in-patients were collected anonymously via a standardised multiple choice questionnaire. Among 1558 questionnaires received from 746 European hospitals, 59% were provided by anaesthetists and 41% by surgeons. There are no regular on-site staff training programmes on POP management in the institution for 34% of the respondents, patients are systematically provided with POP information before surgery for 48% of respondents; balanced analgesia following major surgery and regular administration of analgesics are largely used; 25% of respondents have specific written POP management protocols for all patients in their ward; 34% of respondents say that pain is not assessed and 44% say that pain scores are documented in the patient's chart. This largest ever performed survey confirms the extensive body of evidence that current POP management remains suboptimal and identifies needs for improvement on European surgical wards. However, the wide use of balanced analgesia and the regular administration of analgesics are indicators of ongoing change.

No abstract

No abstract

The culturally adapted version of the painDETECT presents good psychometric properties and shows to be a valid patient-reported outcome for measuring the presence of a neuropathic component in patients with chronic pain.