Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are compounds which may function as agonists or antagonists depending upon the target tissue. This study compares the actions of different SERMs on luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, and on gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) self-priming in the rat. To do this, 4-day cyclic rats were injected twice, on day 2 (metestrus) and day 3 of the estrous cycle, with one of the following SERMs: 0.25 mg ICI 182,780, 3 mg tamoxifen (TX), LY139481-HCl or LY117018-HCl, or 0.5 mg RU58668. Control rats were given subcutaneous injections of 0.2 ml oil. On the morning of day 4 (proestrus in controls), rats from each group were either injected intraperitoneally with pentobarbital (40 mg/kg) for in vivo study or decapitated and their pituitaries collected for incubation (in vitro study). Additionally, pituitaries taken on each day of the estrous cycle from control rats as well as on day 4 from SERM-treated rats were processed for immunohistochemical determination of the estrogen receptor-α (ERα) gonadotrope. The plasma concentration or accumulation of LH in the medium was determined after 1 h (basal secretion). Thereafter, an intravenous bolus of GnRH (50 ng/0.5 ml/100 g BW) or 10–8M GnRH was injected or added to the medium, respectively. After 1 h of GnRH exposure, blood or medium were taken, and another challenge of GnRH was made. At the end of the 3rd h of the experiment, blood or medium samples were taken again and the LH plasma concentration or accumulation in the medium were determined. All SERM treatments reduced uterus weight and decreased basal and stimulated LH secretion. Also, on day 4, rats treated with any SERM other than TX showed vaginal smears infiltrated by leukocytes and a reduction in GnRH self-priming. TX-treated rats exhibited cornified vaginal smears and an estrogenic effect on GnRH self-priming. Moreover, 15-min exposure to two consecutive GnRH (10–8M) challenges 1 h apart in incubated pituitaries with estradiol (E2, 10–8M), TX (10–7M), E2 + TX, or medium alone form ovariectomized rats injected for 3 days with estradiol benzoate (25 µg), TX (3 mg), estradiol benzoate + TX, or 0.2 ml oil, respectively, showed that TX increased GnRH self-priming, as did E2, whereas it reduced the E2-sensitizing effect on GnRH-stimulated LH secretion and cancelled the E2-dependent GnRH self-priming. All SERMs prevented the physiological nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of ERα exhibited during proestrus in control rats, and TX, in addition, induced a significantly larger number of gonadotropes displaying strong cytosolic immunosignals corresponding to ERα than the rest of the experimental groups. Overall, data from this study indicated that, in contrast to the general antagonistic effect of the tested SERMs, TX seemed to display both selective agonist and antagonist activity at the gonadotrope level and on GnRH self-priming of LH secretion respectively.
The selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM) tamoxifen (TX) has agonist/antagonist actions on LH secretion in the rat. Whereas in the absence of oestrogens TX elicits progesterone receptor (PR)-dependent GnRH self-priming, it antagonizes oestrogen-stimulatory action on LH secretion. The aim of these experiments was to explore whether TX treatment-induced differential expression of oestrogen receptor (ER) and ER in the gonadotrope may determine its agonist effect on LH secretion. In the first experiment, basal LH secretion, GnRH-stimulated LH secretion and PR-dependent GnRH self-priming were determined in incubated pituitaries from ovariectomized (OVX) rats treated with oestradiol benzoate (EB), TX or raloxifene (RX). Cycling rats in metoestrus or pro-oestrus were used as basic controls. As in pro-oestrus, pituitaries from OVX rats treated with EB exhibited GnRH-stimulated LH secretion, immunohistochemical PR expression and GnRH self-priming. While RX had no effect on these parameters, TX induced PR expression and GnRH self-priming. GnRH self-priming was absent in pituitaries incubated with the antiprogestin ZK299. In the second experiment, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of ER and ER in gonadotropes of cycling rats and OVX rats treated with EB, TX or RX. We found that while ER expression was similar in all six groups, ER expression was oestrous cycle dependent. Moreover, ER expression in gonadotropes of TX-treated rats was as high as that found in pro-oestrus, while ER expression in the gonadotropes of RX-treated rats was lower than in metoestrous or pro-oestrous pituitaries. These results suggest that, in the absence of the cognate ligand, TX, unlike RX, may regulate LH secretion through the ER subtype in gonadotropes.
Hyperstimulation of ovarian function with human FSH (hFSH) attenuates the preovulatory surge of LH. These experiments aimed at investigating the mechanism of ovarian-mediated FSH suppression of the progesterone (P 4 ) receptor (PR)-dependent LH surge in the rat. Four-day cycling rats were injected with hFSH, oestradiol benzoate (EB) or vehicle during the dioestrous phase. On pro-oestrus, their pituitaries were studied for PR mRNA and protein expression. Additionally, pro-oestrous pituitaries were incubated in the presence of oestradiol-17b (E 2 ), and primed with P 4 and LH-releasing hormone (LHRH), with or without the antiprogestin RU486. After 1 h of incubation, pituitaries were either challenged or not challenged with LHRH. Measured basal and LHRH-stimulated LH secretions and LHRH self-priming were compared with those exhibited by incubated pituitaries on day 4 from ovariectomized (OVX) rats in metoestrus (day 2) injected with hFSH and/or EB on days 2 and 3. The results showed that: i) hFSH lowered the spontaneous LH surge without affecting basal LH and E 2 levels, gonadotroph PR-A/PR-B mRNA ratio or immunohistochemical protein expression; ii) incubated pro-oestrous pituitaries from hFSH-treated rats did not respond to P 4 or LHRH, and lacked E 2 -augmenting and LHRH self-priming effects and iii) OVX reversed the inhibitory effects of hFSH on LH secretion. It is concluded that under the influence of hFSH, the ovaries produce a non-steroidal factor which suppresses all PR-dependent events of the LH surge elicited by E 2 . The action of such a factor seemed to be due to a blockade of gonadotroph PR action rather than to an inhibition of PR expression.
Background Antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive kidney transplant (KT) recipients receiving antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as induction. An alternative strategy of premature discontinuation of prophylaxis after CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) recovery (immunoguided prevention) has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether it is effective and safe to discontinue prophylaxis when CMV-CMI is detected and to continue with preemptive therapy. Methods In this open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to follow immunoguided strategy, receiving prophylaxis (valganciclovir 900 mg daily) until CMV-CMI recovery or to receive fixed-duration prophylaxis until day +90. After prophylaxis, preemptive therapy (valganciclovir 900 mg twice daily) was indicated in both arms until month 6. The primary and secondary outcomes were incidence of CMV disease and replication, respectively, within the first 12 months. Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) assessed two deleterious events (CMV disease/replication and neutropenia). Results A total of 150 CMV-seropositive KT recipients were randomly assigned. There was no difference in the incidence of CMV disease (0% vs. 2.7%; P = 0.149) and replication (17.1% vs. 13.5%; log-rank test, P = 0.422) between both arms. Incidence of neutropenia was lower in the immunoguided arm (9.2% vs. 37.8%; OR, 6.0; P < 0.001). A total of 66.1% of patients in the immunoguided arm showed a better DOOR, indicating a greater likelihood of a better outcome. Conclusions Prophylaxis can be prematurely discontinued in CMV-seropositive KT patients receiving ATG when CMV-CMI is recovered since no significant increase in the incidence of CMV replication or disease is observed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.