In general terms, the population analyzed by this study considered the improvement of treatment within the health care system to be most important, which differs from that suggested by the PRONASA 2001-2006. It was indicated that the importance assigned to the objectives can vary according to the group analyzed, its characteristics and the influence of diverse external factors on the individual, as a result of which the null hypothsesis is rejected. Variations among the populations' evaluations occurred, in particular, between the objective of improving treatment within the health care system and that of the improvement of the population's health. The obtained results guide the steps for communication and the strengthening of the health care system in order to adjust itself to the expectations of the population and support the fulfillment of the established objectives.
Tapia-Cruz JA, Urdapilleta O, Gómez-Dantés O, Garrido-Latorre F. Expenditure evaluation of the construction of health units: Example of community participation. Salud Publica Mex 2003;45:483-491. The English version of this paper is available at: http://www.insp.mx/salud/index.html Abstrac Objective. Demonstrate the economic benefits that community participation may render in the construction of health units. Materials and Methods. The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficiency in the construction of 21 auxiliary health units and 81 rural health built through the Program to Support the Development of Health Services for the Non-Insured Population (PASSPA) through three different construction models (national public bidding, restricted invitation and community participation). Comparisons were also made with the units built through regular construction procedures of the Ministry of Health and other institutions. To evaluate the expenditure/m 2 , a univariate analysis using non-parametric statistics and a mathematical model of bootstrapping were used. Results. The median expenditure/m 2 and the delivery times for auxiliary health units, and the median expenditure/m 2 for rural health units were smaller when using community participation. The expenditure/m 2 of those units built through PASSPA was considerably lower than that of health units built through regular construction procedures. Conclusions. The use of community participation in the construction of auxiliary health units and rural health units may impact positively the resource investment and the delivery times when compared with units built through national public biddings and restricted invitations. The possibility of using community parti-Tapia-Cruz JA, Urdapilleta O, Gómez-Dantés O, Garrido-Latorre F. Evaluación del gasto en la construcción de unidades de salud: ejemplo de participación comunitaria. Salud Publica Mex 2003;45:483-491. El texto completo en inglés de este artículo está disponible en: http://www.insp.mx/salud/index.html
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.