Background Neonatal sepsis is a worldwide public health issue in which, depending on the studied population, marked variations concerning its risk and prognostic factors have been reported. The aim of this study was to assess risk and prognostic factors for neonatal sepsis prevailing at a medical unit in southeastern Mexico. Thus, we used a historic cohort design to assess the association between a series of neonates and their mothers, in addition to hospital evolution features and the risk and prognosis of neonatal sepsis (defined by Pediatric Sepsis Consensus [PSC] criteria) in 11,790 newborns consecutively admitted to a Neonatology Service in Mérida, Mexico, between 2004 and 2007. Results Sepsis was found in 514 of 11,790 (4.3 %) newborns; 387 of these cases were categorized as early-onset (<72 h) (75.3 %) and 127, as late-onset (>72 h) (24.7 %). After logistic regression, risk factors for sepsis included the following: low birth weight; prematurity; abnormal amniotic fluid; premature membrane rupture (PMR) at >24 h; respiratory complications, and the requirement of assisted ventilation, O 2 Inspiration fraction (IF) >60 %, or a surgical procedure. Some of these factors were differentially associated with early- or late-onset neonatal sepsis. The overall mortality rate of sepsis was 9.5 %. A marked difference in the mortality rate was found between early- and late-onset sepsis (p >0.0001). After Cox analysis, factors associated with mortality in newborns with sepsis comprised the following: prematurity; low birth weight; low Apgar score; perinatal asphyxia, and the requirement of any invasive medical or surgical procedure. Conclusions The incidence of neonatal sepsis in southeastern Mexico was 4.3 %. A different risk and prognostic profile between early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis was found.

The prevalence of MSK pain in our study was 25.5%. Geographic variations in the prevalence of MSK pain and specific diagnoses suggested a role for geographic factors in the prevalence of rheumatic diseases.

In the last decade, evidence has accumulated to support the hypothesis that both mild and moderate elevations of serum prolactin (PRL) participate in the clinical expression and pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) has been found in 20-30% of patients with SLE. HPRL seems to be associated with clinical activity of SLE during pregnancy. Although the relationship between HPRL and active SLE in non-pregnant patients is controversial, recent clinical and experimental studies support the potential role of prolactin (PRL) as a promoter of clinical activity and severity of SLE. Mild elevations of serum PRL secondary to microadenoma could trigger the onset of SLE in a subset of patients. Elevated PRL and interleukin (IL)-6 have been found in the urine of patients with active lupus nephritis and in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with active central nervous system (CNS) SLE. PRL may therefore participate in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis and cerebritis, and the presence of PRL may reflect an abnormal communication between the immune system and the neuroendocrine system in active SLE. Lymphocytes from patients with active SLE produce increased amounts of PRL, and this extrapituitary PRL may participate in aberrant immune processes in SLE. There is exciting new evidence that HPRL in SLE may be explained by stimulation of pituitary PRL secretion by cytokines. In addition, defects in peptidergic modulators and dopamine metabolism have been described in patients with SLE. The interactions between PRL, cytoquines, autoantibodies and organ involvement suggest that PRL participates in local and generalized immune and inflammatory processes and acts as a bridge between the neuroendocrine and immune systems in SLE. Understanding the interactions between these systems in SLE will help us to understand and treat this important autoimmune disease.

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of bromocriptine (BRC) as an adjunct to conventional treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study compared BRC at a fixed daily dosage of 2.5 mg with placebo. Patients were followed for 2-17 months (mean 12.5 months). Disease activity was assessed using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), numbers of flares were recorded, and serum prolactin (PRL) levels were obtained at intervals during the study. Patients were allowed to take prednisone and immunosuppressive drugs. Sixty-six patients with SLE entered the study. Thirty-six were treated with BRC, and 30 controls received placebo. Sixteen patients were removed from the study during the treatment period: five in each group left the study because of adverse effects, five became pregnant, and one patient who took placebo died with central nervous system lupus. Four patients in the BRC treatment group and three patients in the placebo group moved away or stopped coming for study visits for unknown reasons, and were lost to follow-up during the course. At entry, serum PRL was (mean+/-s.d.) 24.8 ng/ml+/-18.4 in the BRC treatment group. This value fell to 5.8+/-9.0 after 12 months of treatment. Corresponding PRL values in controls were 23.7+/-22.1 pretreatment and 20.3+/-14 after 12 months. PRL levels in BRC-treated subjects were significantly lower than levels in control subjects after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment. The SLEDAI score on the fifth protocol visit was decreased significantly in the BRC group vs controls: 0.9+/-1.4 vs 2.6+/-4.5 (P < 0.05). Although the absolute number of flares in each group was similar, the mean number of flares/patient/month was decreased significantly in the BRC group compared to the control group (0.08+/-0.1 vs 0.18+/-0.2, P = 0.03). Long term treatment with a low dose of BRC appears to be a safe and effective means of decreasing SLE flares in SLE patients.

The prevalence of MSK pain was 19.6%. MSK pain was more prevalent in women and in the urban setting. A remarkably high prevalence of RA was found in this population, which suggests a role for geographic factors.