Data from the largest prospective surgical series of patients with symptomatic spinal metastases revealed that tumor type, the number of spinal metastases, and the presence of visceral metastases are the most useful predictors of survival and that quality of life is best predicted by preoperative Karnofsky, Frankel, and EQ-5D scores. The Karnofsky score predicts quality of life and survival and is easy to determine at the bedside, unlike the EQ-5D index. Karnofsky score, tumor type, and spinal and visceral metastases should be considered the 4 most important prognostic variables that influence patient management.
Pain response after conventional external beam radiation therapy (cRT) in patients with painful bone metastases is observed in 60% to 70% of patients. The aim of the VERTICAL trial was to investigate whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves pain response. Methods and Materials: This single-center, phase 2, randomized controlled trial was conducted within the PRESENT cohort, which consists of patients referred for radiation therapy of bone metastases to our tertiary center. Cohort participants with painful bone metastases who gave broad informed consent for randomization were randomly assigned to cRT or SBRT. Only patients in the intervention arm received information about the trial and were offered SBRT (1 Â 18 Gy, 3 Â 10 Gy, or 5 Â 7 Gy), which they could accept or refuse. Patients who refused SBRT underwent standard cRT (1 Â 8 Gy, 5 Â 4 Gy, or 10 Â 3 Gy). Patients in the control arm were not informed. Primary endpoint was pain response at 3 months after radiation therapy.
Study Design:
Systematic review.
Objectives:
We conducted a systematic review of the literature to answer the following questions regarding the use of steroid therapy in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC): 1. In cases of MSCC, what is the effect of steroid administration before definitive radiotherapy or surgery on ambulatory status, bowel and bladder function and survival? 2. What steroid dosing regimens are associated with the best outcomes concerning neurological symptoms and complication prevention in cases of MSCC?
Summary of Background Data:
Currently, there is significant variation in the initial bolus dose, daily maintenance dose and duration of treatment when steroids are used as a bridge to definitive therapy for MSCC.
Methods:
A literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in June 2016, using Medline via Ovid SP, Medline via PubMed, Embase, Biosis Previews and the Cochrane Library. Search terms used in each database varied slightly to optimize results. All generic steroid formulations were included along with spinal cord compression or myelopathy combined with metastatic or malignant tumors. Papers discussing acute traumatic causes of spinal cord compression were excluded, as were papers discussing cord compression from nonmetastatic tumors or epidural lipomatosis. Subjects were limited to adult humans undergoing definitive treatment with radiotherapy or surgery.
Results:
Of the 309 papers retrieved, 66 full text studies were reviewed and 6 papers were found to address the stated questions.
Conclusions:
There is a paucity of high quality literature evaluating the use of steroids in MSCC. On the basis of the evidence available an initial 10 mg intravenous bolus of dexamethasone followed by 16 mg PO QD has been associated with fewer complications compared with 100 mg bolus and 96 mg QD. Weaning of steroids should occur rapidly after definitive treatment. Risk of gastric bleeding or perforation can be managed with the routine use of proton-pump inhibitors.
Level of Evidence:
Level IIIa.
Study Design:
Literature review.
Objective:
To provide an overview of the recent advances in spinal oncology, emphasizing the key
role of the surgeon in the treatment of patients with spinal metastatic tumors.
Methods:
Literature review.
Results:
Therapeutic advances led to longer survival times among cancer patients, placing
significant emphasis on durable local control, optimization of quality of life, and
daily function for patients with spinal metastatic tumors. Recent integration of modern
diagnostic tools, precision oncologic treatment, and widespread use of new technologies
has transformed the treatment of spinal metastases. Currently, multidisciplinary spinal
oncology teams include spinal surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, pain and
rehabilitation specialists, and interventional radiologists. Consistent use of common
language facilitates communication, definition of treatment indications and outcomes,
alongside comparative clinical research. The main parameters used to characterize
patients with spinal metastases include functional status and health-related quality of
life, the spinal instability neoplastic score, the epidural spinal cord compression
scale, tumor histology, and genomic profile.
Conclusions:
Stereotactic body radiotherapy revolutionized spinal oncology through delivery of
durable local tumor control regardless of tumor histology. Currently, the major surgical
indications include mechanical instability and high-grade spinal cord compression, when
applicable, with surgery providing notable improvement in the quality of life and
functional status for appropriately selected patients. Surgical trends include less
invasive surgery with emphasis on durable local control and spinal stabilization.
Poor performance status at presentation is the strongest indicator of poor short-term survival, whereas low disease load and favorable tumor histology are associated with longer-term survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.