IntroductionGrowing evidence suggests that close contact with nature brings benefits to human health and well-being, but the proposed mechanisms are still not well understood and the associations with health remain uncertain. The Positive Health Effects of the Natural Outdoor environment in Typical Populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE) project investigates the interconnections between natural outdoor environments and better human health and well-being.Aims and methodsThe PHENOTYPE project explores the proposed underlying mechanisms at work (stress reduction/restorative function, physical activity, social interaction, exposure to environmental hazards) and examines the associations with health outcomes for different population groups. It implements conventional and new innovative high-tech methods to characterise the natural environment in terms of quality and quantity. Preventive as well as therapeutic effects of contact with the natural environment are being covered. PHENOTYPE further addresses implications for land-use planning and green space management. The main innovative part of the study is the evaluation of possible short-term and long-term associations of green space and health and the possible underlying mechanisms in four different countries (each with quite a different type of green space and a different use), using the same methodology, in one research programme. This type of holistic approach has not been undertaken before. Furthermore there are technological innovations such as the use of remote sensing and smartphones in the assessment of green space.ConclusionsThe project will produce a more robust evidence base on links between exposure to natural outdoor environment and human health and well-being, in addition to a better integration of human health needs into land-use planning and green space management in rural as well as urban areas.
Les difficultés à comparer, compiler et établir des preuves empiriques tangibles sur les relations entre l'environnement naturel extérieur et ses bienfaits sur la santé et le bien-être humains sont réelles. Pourtant ce type de lien est régulièrement évoqué et influence des décisions de gestionnaires urbains et d'habitants. Ces questions constituent un lieu de rencontre vécu, ou ordinaire, entre nature et sociétés. En publiant cette méta-analyse basée sur de la littérature scientifique internationale, NSS entend fournir une contribution de synthèse accessible sur l'état des connaissances à ce sujet. La Rédaction Résumé-Cet article examine treize revues de synthèse de la recherche scientifique et des publications officielles qui traitent des effets positifs de l'exposition à un environnement naturel sur les dimensions psychique, physique et sociale de la santé humaine et du bien-être. Ces contributions émanent de plusieurs disciplines tandis que les contributions interdisciplinaires sont rares. Notre analyse suggère des preuves empiriques modérées à fortes pour les impacts positifs des espaces verts et bleus sur la santé mentale et physique, et faibles en ce qui concerne la cohésion sociale. En outre, elle révèle que la comparaison entre les différentes études s'avère délicate et qu'il est difficile de dégager des conclusions claires au sujet des bienfaits des espaces verts et bleus sur la santé. De fait, des recommandations de recherche sont esquissées dans l'optique de contribuer à combler le manque de connaissances.
This article considers conceptual frameworks and models applied in research about the multiple relations between human contact with natural environments (specifically green public spaces), diverse kinds of human activities and uses of those spaces, and effects on physical and mental health. Conceptual frameworks are tools for thinking about such complex subjects. Conceptual models represent the multiple relations between key factors and variables. These models can be used to represent the mutual interactions between the core components of environmental conditions of specific green public spaces, the main kinds of human activities in those settings, and various impacts on health. A literature search showed that the authors of various conceptual models used a metaphor of pathways to represent relations between explanatory variables by linear cause-effect relations. Mutual interaction between key variables and feedback loops between different components of the model are rarely included. Hence, it is argued that these models do not represent the complexity of real world situations. The authors propose a systemic conceptual framework founded on core principles of human ecology. The proposed conceptual framework and model have been formulated during and after an EU 7th Framework project about the ''Positive Health Effects of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Typical Populations in Different Regions of Europe."
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.