PurposeDespite its high prognostic value, widespread clinical implementation of 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy is hampered by a lack of validation and standardization. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of planar 123I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy in patients with heart failure (HF).MethodsPlanar myocardial MIBG images of 70 HF patients were analysed by two experienced and one inexperienced observer. The reproducibility of early and delayed heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratios, as well as washout rate (WR) calculated by two different methods, was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman analysis. In addition, a subanalysis in patients with a very low H/M ratio (delayed H/M ratio <1.4) was performed. The delayed H/M ratio was also assessed using fixed-size oval and circular cardiac regions of interest (ROI).ResultsIntra- and interobserver analyses and experienced versus inexperienced observer analysis showed excellent agreement for the measured early and delayed H/M ratios and WR on planar 123I-MIBG images (the ICCs for the delayed H/M ratios were 0.98, 0.96 and 0.90, respectively). In addition, the WR without background correction resulted in higher reliability than the WR with background correction (the interobserver Bland-Altman 95 % limits of agreement were −2.50 to 2.16 and −10.10 to 10.14, respectively). Furthermore, the delayed H/M ratio measurements remained reliable in a subgroup of patients with a very low delayed H/M ratio (ICC 0.93 for the inter-observer analysis). Moreover, a fixed-size cardiac ROI could be used for the assessment of delayed H/M ratios, with good reliability of the measurement.ConclusionThe present study showed a high reliability of planar 123I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy in HF patients, confirming that MIBG myocardial scintigraphy can be implemented easily for clinical risk stratification in HF.
In clinically stable hips, delayed ultrasound between three and five months is regarded as safe and could prevent for overtreatment of mild dysplastic hips.
Aims The objective of this study was to compare the two-year migration pattern and clinical outcomes of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with an asymmetrical tibial design (Persona PS) and a well-proven TKA with a symmetrical tibial design (NexGen LPS). Methods A randomized controlled radiostereometric analysis (RSA) trial was conducted including 75 cemented posterior-stabilized TKAs. Implant migration was measured with RSA. Maximum total point motion (MTPM), translations, rotations, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at one week postoperatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results A linear mixed-effect model using RSA data of 31 asymmetrical and 38 symmetrical TKAs did not show a difference in mean MTPM migration pattern of the tibial or femoral components. Mean tibial component MTPM at two years postoperative of the asymmetrical TKA design was 0.93 mm and 1.00 mm for the symmetrical design. For the femoral component these values were 1.04 mm and 1.14 mm, respectively. No significant differences were observed in other migration parameters or in clinical and PROM measurements. Conclusion The TKA design with an asymmetrical tibial component has comparable component migration with the proven TKA with a symmetrical tibial component. This suggests the risk of long-term aseptic loosening of the two designs is comparable. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):855–863.
Background and purposeStability and survival of cemented total hip prostheses is dependent on a multitude of factors, including the type of cement that is used. Bone cements vary in viscosity, from low to medium and high. There have been few clinical RSA studies comparing the performance of low- and high-viscosity bone cements. We compared the migration behavior of the Stanmore hip stem cemented using novel low-viscosity Palamed bone cement with that of the same stem cemented with conventional high-viscosity Palacos bone cement.Patients and methodsWe performed a randomized controlled study involving 39 patients (40 hips) undergoing primary total hip replacement for primary or secondary osteoarthritis. 22 patients (22 hips) were randomized to Palacos and 17 patients (18 hips) were randomized to Palamed. Migration was determined by RSA.ResultsNone of these 40 hips had been revised at the 10-year follow-up mark. To our knowledge, the patients who died before they reached the 10-year endpoint still had the implant in situ. No statistically significant or clinically significant differences were found between the 2 groups for mean translations, rotations, and maximum total-point motion (MTPM).InterpretationWe found similar migration of the Stanmore stem in the high-viscosity Palacos cement group and the low-viscosity Palamed cement group. We therefore expect that the risk of aseptic loosening with the new Palamed cement would be comparable to that with the conventional Palacos cement. The choice of which type of bone cement to use is therefore up to the surgeon’s preference.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.