Since sunscreens are recommended by doctors and used all over the world to protect against sun induced erythema, it is important to evaluate if sunscreens are used as recommended and if the intended effect is achieved. We refer to the findings of several studies performed on people at risk of sun-burning at beaches in the vicinity of Copenhagen, Denmark. On a sunny day at the beach 65% of the sunbathers used one or more sunscreens. Of these, 46% used the sunscreen all over the body and a median sun protection factor (SPF) of 5-6 was used. The sunbathers used 0.5 mg/cm2 of sunscreen independent of skin type. Of the sunscreen users, 43% applied the sunscreen after arriving at the beach and 43% reapplied the sunscreen after swimming. The sun exposure time and the sun exposure dose were almost identical among sunscreen users and non-users. Self-assessed redness of the skin demonstrated that more sunscreen users than non-users reported to be red the day after sun exposure, 42 and 34%, respectively. Theoretical calculations support this findings and show a drastic reduction in the achieved photoprotection if a thinner layer than in the test situation is used. Sunscreens do not protect against erythema if not used as intended. Instead of changing people's habits, we suggest modifying the test method by adjusting the amount of sunscreen to that used in real life situations, 0.5 mg/cm2.

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if photodynamic therapy with topical application of 5-aminolaevulinic acid followed by irradiation with incoherent filtered and unfiltered light (ALA-PDT) is an effective therapy for recalcitrant hand and foot warts. In 30 patients with recalcitrant warts, 49 regions with a total of 250 warts were randomized to one of the following five treatments: (i) ALA-PDT with white light applied three times within 10 days (W3); (ii) ALA-PDT with white light applied once (W1); (iii) ALA-PDT with red light applied three times within 10 days (R3); (iv) ALA-PDT with blue light applied three times within 10 days (B3), and (v) cryotherapy applied up to four times within 2 months (CRYO). The ALA-PDT treatment modality was repeated in case of partially responding warts. Significantly more warts were completely healed after W3 and W1 than after R3, B3 and CRYO (P < 0.01): 73% of the warts treated with W3 were completely healed, 71% after W1, 42% after R3, 23% after B3 and 20% after CRYO. No scars were observed in the ALA-PDT treated areas and patients treated for foot warts were all able to walk after the treatment. No recurrences in completely responding ALA-PDT treated warts were observed after 12 months of follow-up. In conclusion, photodynamic therapy with topical 5-aminolaevulinic acid followed by irradiation with white light is a promising treatment for recalcitrant hand and foot warts.

The ultraviolet (UV) sensitivity is determined by a phototest where the skin is exposed to well-defined doses of UV radiation and the resulting erythema is graded by visual scoring after 20-24 h. In this study we wanted to estimate the reproducibility of erythema assessment in phototesting. Twenty-one healthy Caucasians with skin types I to IV were phototested on UV un-exposed buttock skin using a xenon lamp solar simulator. Twenty-four hours after UV exposure eight physicians independently graded the erythema reactions two times. Data were analysed using inter- and intra-observer agreement and kappa statistics, which adjusts for agreement that could be caused by chance alone. Observed agreement and kappa statistics were found to decrease with increasing intensity of erythema and to be lower for skin types III and IV compared to skin types I and II. Intra-observer agreement was uniformly better than inter-observer agreement. The difference between observers assessment could be as much as three clinical erythema grades. Physicians's previous experience with phototesting only had a minor influence on agreement. In conclusion, phototesting is based on subjective assessment of erythema and is not as precise and reproducible as expected. Agreement was better for barely perceptible erythema than for erythema with a well-defined border and we therefore recommend that the barely perceptible erythema reaction should be used for measurement of the minimal erythema dose.