Our study found a significant delay in diagnosis of leprosy in north-eastern Colombia, which might explain the continuously high rate of DG2 among new cases being notified in the country. Both patient- and health system-related factors were associated with longer diagnostic delay. Interventions to increase awareness of disease among the general population and timely referral to a specialised health professional are urgently needed in our study setting.
Background: It is well-founded that empathy is an attribute that increases the likelihood of good
Objective: The aim of this study is to check whether there are differences in the distribution of empathy levels in dental students from nine faculties of dentistry Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica and Dominican Republic. Methods: The levels of empathy and matrices of empathy construct matrices are estimated dental students by using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, the Spanish version for students (S version) culturally validated in Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica and Dominican Republic measured by arbitrator criteria. Cronbach α is estimated. Data of empathic orientation of the studied factors between faculties are analyzed and compared by ANOVA and Duncan
Introduction:The controversy over the presence of empathic decline within the course in students of medicine, dentistry and health sciences in general, has not fully been studied. This controversy could be partially solved if massive studies of empathy levels are made in similar cultural, social and economic contexts. Material and Methods:Empathy levels within the course were studied in eighteen dental schools from six countries in Latin America (2013). The mean of the empathy levels were used to study the behavior between first and fifth academic years. The values of empathy levels within the course were observed by applying the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, the Spanish version. All these studies were cross-sectional. The value of means observed, were subjected to regression studies and further adjustment curves were obtained and the coefficient of determination were calculated. Results: Six different models of behavior were observed, which found that five of them suffer empathic decline within the course, but with different final results: in some the decline persists until the fifth academic year and in others, this decline 'recovers' persistently until the fifth academic year. The sixth model is characterized by a constant and persistent increase of levels of empathy within the course until the last academic year. Discussion: There are six different models for the behavior of means of levels of empathy within the course evaluated by a common methodology in eighteen dental schools from six countries of Latin America. These findings support the existence of variability of empathic response and a comprehensive approach is needed to find the causes that give rise to this variability. Conclusion:In dental students of Latin America, there is variability in the behavior of the distribution in means between the academic years of the dentistry schools examined in this study.
<p class="p1"><strong>Antecedentes. </strong>La empatía es un importante atributo que los estudiantes de medicina deben tener y ha sido poco estudiado en América Latina. </p><p class="p2"> </p><p class="p1"><strong>Objetivo.</strong> Determinar el nivel de orientación empática de los estudiantes de medicina de las universidades Libre, seccional Barranquilla, y San Martín, sede Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla.</p><p class="p1"><strong>Materiales y métodos.</strong> La orientación empática de los estudiantes se midió mediante la aplicación de la Escala de Empatía Médica de Jefferson en español, diseñada para estudiantes <span class="s1">—</span>versión S<span class="s1">—</span>, validada en otros países de Latinoamérica y adaptada culturalmente a Colombia. La comparación de los datos se realizó mediante análisis de varianza bifactorial <span class="s1">—</span>Modelo III<span class="s1">—</span>. </p><p class="p1"><strong>Resultados.</strong> El nivel de orientación empática de los estudiantes tiene valores bajos, ubicados por encima del valor central del rango de la escala, 20 a140. Las diferencias entre las puntuaciones, según cursos y género, no fueron estadísticamente significativas al comparar los promedios de las sumatorias del puntaje de los estudiantes; sin embargo, se observó, un comportamiento diferente según el género entre las universidades: el femenino tuvo valores de orientación empática mejores que el masculino en la Universidad San Martín, mientras que en la Universidad Libre sucedió, relativamente, lo contrario. La comparación de las respuestas permitió observar que existen diferencias entre ellas. </p><p class="p1"><strong>Conclusiones.</strong> Los resultados de este estudio no explican la contradicción encontrada en relación a las diferencias de género y cursos entre universidades; sin embargo, estos resultados son consistentes con otros trabajos, especialmente realizados en Latinoamérica, que muestran variabilidad de la respuesta empática en estudiantes de medicina. Las diferencias entre las universidades no pueden atribuirse a causas psicológicas solamente, sino a la presencia de otros factores que también influyen en la respuesta empática.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.