Background In older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), cognitive impairment and frailty are prevalent. It is unknown whether the risk and benefit of anticoagulation differ by cognitive function and frailty. Methods A total of 1244 individuals with AF with age ≥65 years and a CHADSVASC score ≥2 were recruited from clinics in Massachusetts and Georgia between 2016 and 18 and followed until 2020. At baseline, frailty status and cognitive function were assessed. Hazard ratios of anticoagulation on physician adjudicated outcomes were adjusted by the propensity for receiving anticoagulation and stratified by cognitive function and frailty status. Results The average age was 75.5 (± 7.1) years, 49% were women, and 86% were prescribed oral anticoagulants. At baseline, 528 (42.4%) participants were cognitively impaired and 172 (13.8%) were frail. The adjusted hazard ratios of anticoagulation for the composite of major bleeding or death were 2.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.08–4.61) among cognitively impaired individuals and 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.49–1.79) among cognitively intact individuals (P for interaction = 0.08). Adjusted hazard ratios for anticoagulation were 1.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.66–5.13) among frail individuals and 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 0.84–2.40) among not frail individuals (P for interaction = 0.67). Conclusion Compared with no anticoagulation, anticoagulation is associated with more major bleeding episodes and death in older patients with AF who are cognitively impaired.

Background Among older patients with atrial fibrillation, there are limited data examining clinically meaningful changes in quality of life (QoL). We examined the extent of, and factors associated with, clinically meaningful change in QoL over 1‐year among older adults with atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results Patients from cardiology, electrophysiology, and primary care clinics in Massachusetts and Georgia were enrolled in a cohort study (2015–2018). The Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality‐of‐Life questionnaire was used to assess overall QoL and across 3 subscales: symptoms, daily activities, and treatment concern. Clinically meaningful change in QoL (ie, difference between 1‐year and baseline QoL score) was categorized as either a decline (≤−5.0 points), no clinically meaningful change (−5.0 to +5.0 points), or an increase (≥+5.0 points). Ordinal logistic models were used to examine factors associated with QoL changes. Participants (n=1097) were on average 75 years old, 48% were women, and 87% White. Approximately 40% experienced a clinically meaningful increase in QoL and 1 in every 5 patients experienced a decline in QoL. After multivariable adjustment, women, non‐Whites, those who reported depressive and anxiety symptoms, fair/poor self‐rated health, low social support, heart failure, or diabetes mellitus experienced clinically meaningful declines in QoL. Conclusions These findings provide insights to the magnitude of, and factors associated with, clinically meaningful change in QoL among older patients with atrial fibrillation. Assessment of comorbidities and psychosocial factors may help identify patients at high risk for declining QoL and those who require additional surveillance to maximize important clinical and patient‐centered outcomes.

No abstract

Background Holistic care models emphasize management of comorbid conditions to improve patient-reported outcomes in treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated relations between multimorbidity, physical frailty, and self-rated health (SRH) among older adults with AF. Methods Patients (n = 1235) with AF aged 65 years and older were recruited from five medical centers in Massachusetts and Georgia between 2015 and 2018. Ten previously diagnosed cardiometabolic and 8 non-cardiometabolic conditions were assessed from medical records. Physical Frailty was assessed with the Cardiovascular Health Study frailty scale. SRH was categorized as either “excellent/very good”, “good”, and “fair/poor”. Separate multivariable ordinal logistic models were used to examine the associations between multimorbidity and SRH, physical frailty and SRH, and multimorbidity and physical frailty. Results Overall, 16% of participants rated their health as fair/poor and 14% were frail. Hypertension (90%), dyslipidemia (80%), and heart failure (37%) were the most prevalent cardiometabolic conditions. Arthritis (51%), anemia (31%), and cancer (30%), the most common non-cardiometabolic diseases. After multivariable adjustment, patients with higher multimorbidity were more likely to report poorer health status (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.15 [95% CI: 1.53–3.03], ≥ 8 vs 1–4; OR: 1.37 [95% CI: 1.02–1.83], 5–7 vs 1–4), as did those with more prevalent cardiometabolic and non-cardiometabolic conditions. Patients who were pre-frail (OR: 1.73 [95% CI: 1.30–2.30]) or frail (OR: 6.81 [95% CI: 4.34–10.68]) reported poorer health status. Higher multimorbidity was associated with worse frailty status. Conclusions Multimorbidity and physical frailty were common and related to SRH. Our findings suggest that holistic management approaches may influence SRH among older patients with AF.

No abstract