The combined analysis of haplotype panels with phenotype clinical cohorts is a common approach to explore the genetic architecture of human diseases. However, genetic studies are mainly based on single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels). Here, we contribute to fill this gap by generating a dense haplotype map focused on the identification, characterization, and phasing of structural variants (SVs). By integrating multiple variant identification methods and Logistic Regression Models (LRMs), we present a catalogue of 35 431 441 variants, including 89 178 SVs (≥50 bp), 30 325 064 SNVs and 5 017 199 indels, across 785 Illumina high coverage (30x) whole-genomes from the Iberian GCAT Cohort, containing a median of 3.52M SNVs, 606 336 indels and 6393 SVs per individual. The haplotype panel is able to impute up to 14 360 728 SNVs/indels and 23 179 SVs, showing a 2.7-fold increase for SVs compared with available genetic variation panels. The value of this panel for SVs analysis is shown through an imputed rare Alu element located in a new locus associated with Mononeuritis of lower limb, a rare neuromuscular disease. This study represents the first deep characterization of genetic variation within the Iberian population and the first operational haplotype panel to systematically include the SVs into genome-wide genetic studies.

The combined analysis of haplotype panels with phenotype clinical cohorts is a common approach to explore the genetic architecture of human diseases. However, genetic studies are mainly based on single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels). Here, we contribute to fill this gap by generating a dense haplotype map focused on the identification, characterization and phasing of structural variants (SVs). By integrating multiple variant identification methods and Logistic Regression models, we present a catalogue of 35,431,441 variants, including 89,178 SVs (≥50bp), 30,325,064 SNVs and 5,017,199 indels, across 785 Illumina high coverage (30X) whole-genomes from the Iberian GCAT Cohort, containing 3.52M SNVs, 606,336 indels and 6,393 SVs in median per individual. The haplotype panel is able to impute up to 14,360,728 SNVs/indels and 23,179 SVs, showing a 2.7-fold increase for SVs compared with available genetic variation panels. The value of this panel for SVs analysis is shown through an imputed rare Alu element located in a new locus associated with mononeuritis of lower limb, a rare neuromuscular disease. This study represents the first deep characterization of genetic variation within the Iberian population and the first operational haplotype panel to systematically include the SVs into genome-wide genetic studies.

Introduction: Network-based methods are promising approaches in systems toxicology because they can be used to predict the effects of drugs and chemicals on health, to elucidate the mode of action of compounds, and to identify biomarkers of toxicity. Over the years, the network biology community has developed a wide range of methods, and users are faced with the task of choosing the most appropriate method for their own application. Furthermore, the advantages and limitations of each method are difficult to determine without a proper standard and comparative evaluation of their performance. This study aims to evaluate different network-based methods that can be used to gain biological insight into the mechanisms of drug toxicity, using valproic acid (VPA)-induced liver steatosis as a benchmark.Methods: We provide a comprehensive analysis of the results produced by each method and highlight the fact that the experimental design (how the method is applied) is relevant in addition to the method specifications. We also contribute with a systematic methodology to analyse the results of the methods individually and in a comparative manner.Results: Our results show that the evaluated tools differ in their performance against the benchmark and in their ability to provide novel insights into the mechanism of adverse effects of the drug. We also suggest that aggregation of the results provided by different methods provides a more confident set of candidate genes and processes to further the knowledge of the drug’s mechanism of action.Discussion: By providing a detailed and systematic analysis of the results of different network-based tools, we aim to assist users in making informed decisions about the most appropriate method for systems toxicology applications.

No abstract