IntroductionTibial shaft fractures are a common presenting injury among the pediatric population. Asthma is also a common diagnosis that is frequently encountered in this population and has a significant impact on healthcare utilization, quality of life, and mortality. Given the high prevalence of these conditions and risks of peri-anesthetic respiratory complications, the purpose of this study was to evaluate an association between asthma and the incidence of 30-day postoperative complications following the surgical management of tibial shaft fractures in the pediatric population.
MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database was used to identify pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for tibial shaft fractures from 2013-2019. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients with a history of asthma and patients without a history of asthma. Differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analyses.
ResultsOf the 2,649 patients who underwent surgical treatment for tibial shaft fractures, 115 (4.3%) had asthma. Compared to those without asthma, patients with a history of asthma were more likely to have other medical comorbidities. After controlling for the differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, patients with asthma had an increased risk of prolonged hospital stay (OR 5.78; 95% CI 1.67 to 20.00; p=0.006).
ConclusionPediatric patients being surgically treated for tibial shaft fractures with asthma had an increased risk of prolonged hospital stay. It is important that proper preoperative workup, perioperative care, and understanding of the implications of asthma on postoperative recovery are appreciated to reduce prolonged hospitalization lengths and minimize hospital costs associated with tibial shaft fracture surgery.
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic strained the United States healthcare system, and associated policies resulted in the postponement or cancellation of many elective surgeries. While most orthopaedic surgeons are aware of how the pandemic affected their patients’ care, broader national trends in the operative treatment of orthopaedic knee pathology are poorly characterized. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify trends in orthopaedic knee procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: The TriNetX database was queried for orthopaedic knee procedures performed from March 2018 to May 2021. Procedures were classified as arthroplasty (total knee arthroplasty (TKA), revision total knee arthroplasty) or non-arthroplasty (tendon or ligament repair, fracture fixation). Procedural volume per healthcare organization was determined over five seasons from March 2020 to May 2021 and compared to overlapping pre-pandemic periods from March 2018 to May 2019. Descriptive analysis was performed, and comparisons were made using a Student’s T-test.
Results: Compared to the pre-pandemic period, there were significant decreases in primary TKA (p=0.016), femoral or entire tibial component revision TKA (p=0.005), and open treatment of femoral shaft fractures (p=0.007) in spring 2020. Procedural volume returned to baseline in summer 2020 through winter 2021. In spring 2021, primary TKA (p=0.017) and one component revision TKA (p=0.003) increased compared to the pre-pandemic period.
Conclusion: The greatest decrease in knee procedures occurred early in the pandemic. Rates of these procedures have since rebounded, with some exceeding pre-pandemic levels. Hospitals are now better able to accommodate orthopaedic surgical volume while continuing to care for patients with COVID-19.
Seizure disorders and hip dysplasia Quan et al. 319
ComorbiditiesCompared to patients who did not have a seizure disorder, pediatric patients with a seizure disorder were
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.