Background:Docetaxel is widely used as a chemotherapeutic agent for gastric cancer treatment. A combined regimen with sunitinib demonstrated a synergistic antitumour effect in a preclinical model. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in patients with unresectable or metastatic advanced gastric cancer following failure of treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination.Methods:This open-label, phase II, randomised trial enrolled patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer. Patients were assigned to either a docetaxel monotherapy arm (D only arm: 60 mg m−2, every 3 weeks) or a combination arm (DS arm: docetaxel+sunitinib 37.5 mg every day). The primary end point of the study was time to progression and the secondary end points were overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and toxicity profile. A pharmacokinetic study was also performed.Results:A total of 107 patients were entered into the study. The TTP was not significantly prolonged in the DS arm when compared with the D only arm (DS vs D only arm: 3.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9–4.9) vs 2.6 months (95% CI 1.8–3.5) (P=0.206). The hazard ratio for TTP was 0.77 (95% CI 0.52–1.16). However, the objective response rate was significantly higher in the DS arm (41.1% vs 14.3%, P=0.002). Patients in the DS arm experienced stomatitis, diarrhoea, and hand–foot syndrome more frequently.Conclusion:The addition of sunitinib to docetaxel did not significantly prolong TTP, although it significantly increased response.

BACKGROUND: A prognostic model based on clinical parameters for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with gefitinib (250 mg/day) as a salvage therapy was devised. METHODS: Clinical data regarding a total of 316 metastatic or recurrent NSCLC patients who were treated with gefitinib were analyzed. RESULTS: Poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) by multivariate analysis were an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 to 3 (hazards ratio [HR] of 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57‐2.73 [P < .001]), the presence of intra‐abdominal metastasis (HR of 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33‐2.34 [P < .001]), elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (HR of 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13‐2.00 [P = .005]), time interval from diagnosis to gefitinib therapy of ≤12 months (HR of 1.48; 95% CI, 1.12‐1.95 [P = .005]), low serum albumin (HR of 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09‐1.92 [P = .009]), progression‐free interval for previous chemotherapy of ≤12 weeks (HR of 1.40; 95% CI, 1.0‐1.84 [P = .015]), white blood cell >10,000/μL (HR of 1.38; 95% CI, 1.02‐1.85 [P = .032]), and ever‐smoker (HR of 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02‐1.75 [P = .033]). Of the 272 patients applicable to this prognostic model, 41 patients (15%) were categorized as a good prognosis group (0‐1 risk factors), 100 patients (37%) as an intermediate prognosis group (2‐3 risk factors), 81 patients (30%) as a poor prognosis group (4‐5 risk factors), and 50 patients (16%) as a very poor prognosis group (≥6 risk factors). The median OS from the time of gefitinib treatment for the good, intermediate, poor, and very poor prognosis groups were 18.0 months, 11.2 months, 4.0 months, and 1.3 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This prognostic model based on easily available clinical variables would be useful to identify patients who might derive more benefit from gefitinib treatment and to make decisions in clinical practice. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.