Objective To determine the relationship between race, income, and disease outcomes in children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Study design Data from 438 subjects with JDM enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Legacy Registry were analyzed. Demographic data included age, sex, race, income and insurance status. Clinical outcomes included muscle strength, presence of rash, calcinosis, weakness, physical function and quality of life measures. Disease outcomes were compared based on race and income. Results Minority subjects were significantly more likely to have low family income, and significantly worse scores on measures of physical function, disease activity and quality of life measures. Lower income subjects had worse scores on measures of physical function, disease activity and quality of life scores, as well as weakness. Black subjects were more likely to have calcinosis. Despite these differences in outcome measures, there were no significant differences in time to diagnosis or disease duration. Using calcinosis as a marker of disease morbidity, Black race, annual family income less than $50,000 per year, negative ANA, and delay in diagnosis greater than 12 months were associated with calcinosis. Conclusions Minority race and lower income are associated with worse morbidity and outcomes in subjects with JDM. Calcinosis was more common in Black subjects. Future studies are needed to further understand these associations so that efforts may be developed to address health disparities in subjects with JDM and improve disease outcomes.
PIK3CA mutation frequency varies among breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Recent evidence suggests combination therapy with the PI3K inhibitor (PI3Ki) alpelisib and endocrine therapy (ET) improves response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in PIK3CA-mutant, hormone receptor positive (HR+) BC versus ET alone; thus, better understanding the clinical and epidemiologic elements of these mutations is warranted. This systematic review characterizes the PIK3CA mutation epidemiology, type of testing approaches (e.g., liquid or tissue tumor biopsy), and stability/concordance (e.g., consistency in results by liquid versus solid tumor sample, by the same method over time) in patients with HR+/HER2– advanced (locally unresectable) or metastatic disease (HR+/HER2– mBC) and explores performance (e.g., pairwise concordance, sensitivity, specificity, or predictive value) of respective mutation findings. A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and select conference abstracts (i.e., AACR, ASCO, SABCS, ECCO, and ESMO conferences between 2014 and 2017) identified 39 studies of patients with HR+, HER2– mBC. The median prevalence of PIK3CA mutation was 36% (range: 13.3% to 61.5%); identified testing approaches more commonly used tissue over liquid biopsies and primarily utilized next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or Sanger sequencing. There was concordance and stability between tissues (range: 70.4% to 94%) based on limited data. Given the clinical benefit of the PI3Ki alpelisib in patients with PIK3CA mutant HR+/HER2– mBC, determination of tumor PIK3CA mutation status is of importance in managing patients with HR+/HER2– mBC. Prevalence of this mutation and utility of test methodologies likely warrants PIK3CA mutation testing in all patients with this breast cancer subtype via definitive assessment of PIK3CA mutational status.
Introduction: Clinical research on the predictive value of PIK3CA mutations in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has advanced in recent years. However, knowledge of epidemiological prevalence has not been systematically evaluated. This study aimed to report prevalence of PIK3CA mutation using different biopsy techniques as well as specific hotspot mutations across the available literature. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and select conference abstracts was performed by two independent researchers that included, but was not limited to, keywords: “breast neoplasm”, “PIK3CA protein”, “hormone receptor positive”, and “metastases”. English-language studies in HR+, HER2– mBC detailing the prevalence of PIK3CA mutations and published between January 1993 through August 2017 were included. Content analysis was employed to quantify collected data elements. Results: Of 558 studies included for full-text review, 36 met inclusion criteria. Most included studies (n = 18) were observational in nature. A total of 4,247 samples were tested for genetic mutations. Most studies used tissue biopsy samples (n = 33; 89%). Tumor samples accounted for 84.6% of all samples (n = 3597). Liquid biopsies were performed in 4 studies (11%) and accounted for 15.3% of all samples (n = 650). One study reported both liquid and tumor biopsy data. Overall, reported prevalence of the PIK3CA mutation ranged from 13.3% to 61.5%. Median prevalence was 36.4% (25th percentile = 28.6%; 75th percentile = 48.4%). Among studies using tissue biopsies, the majority reported prevalence from 16.7% to 61.5%. Among studies using liquid biopsies, the majority (n = 3) reported prevalence from 43.3% to 46.8%; one other study reported 13.3%. The most commonly tested hotspot mutations were H1047R and E545K. Among studies reporting specific hotspot mutation prevalence (n = 9), the H1047R hotspot mutation prevalence in these studies ranged between 25% and 75% while the E545K prevalence ranged between 11.1% and 50%. Conclusions: Although discrepancies exist with respect to mutation prevalence estimated across various tissue vs. liquid biopsy techniques, PIK3CA mutations and mutation hotspots (specifically H1047R and E545K) frequently occur in HR+/HER2– mBC. Citation Format: Lea Mollon, Alejandra Aguilar, Elizabeth Anderson, Joni Dean, Lisa Davis, Terri Warholak, Ayal A. Aizer, Emma Platt, Aditya Bardiya, Derek Tang. A systematic literature review of the prevalence of PIK3CA mutations and mutation hotspots in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1207.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.