No abstract

#15 Background: Exemestane (E) is a steroidal aromatase inactivator, which has been demonstrated to be more effective than tamoxifen (T) in metastatic breast cancer (BC). The role of E in adjuvant therapy has been established after 2 to 3 years of T compared to 5 years of T in the Intergroup Exemestane Study (Lancet 2007; 369: 599-70). One objective of the TEAM study was to evaluate E compared to T as initial adjuvant endocrine therapy.
 Methods: Using common criteria, eligible postmenopausal patients in 9 countries with invasive ER+ and/or PR+ early BC, were prospectively randomized to either open-label E 25 mg/day or T 20 mg/day. All patients had completed primary therapy of surgery and chemotherapy if indicated. All data were collected and analyzed by the Central Data Center in Leiden, The Netherlands. The trial was initiated in 2001 with a primary endpoint of DFS between T and E. In 2004, based on results of the IES, TEAM was modified such that all patients on T were switched to E at 2.5-3 years. The modified design includes 2 primary endpoints: DFS of T versus E followed up to 2.75 years, and DFS of E for 5 years versus T switched to E treated for a total of 5 years. The present analysis focuses on the first primary endpoint: DFS for T compared to E at 2.75 years with censoring of events after 2.75 years. Log rank test with a 2-sided significance level of 2.98% stratified by country and factors nested in protocols will be utilized.
 Results: Between January 2001 and January 2006, 9775 women were randomized to T or E of which 9300 will be followed for 2.75 years by October 2008: 99% were ER and/or /PgR+, 50% were node negative, 44% underwent mastectomy, 68% received radiotherapy, and 36% chemotherapy. There have been 693 DFS events (locoregional or distant recurrence, second breast cancers, or death without recurrence) by April 2008 within 2.75 years of randomization. In accordance with the statistical analysis plan, the first planned analysis will be based on 723 events or 9300 patients with at least 2.75 years follow-up. We will present a detailed analysis of the first primary endpoint of DFS between T and E at 2.75 years at the 2008 SABCS. The TEAM study represents the largest of the 3 major trials to compare efficacy of an aromatase inhibitor/inactivator versus tamoxifen as initial endocrine therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 15.

The activity, toxicity, and side effects of TOR in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer are similar if not equivalent to those of TAM. We detected no clear evidence of a dose-response effect for TOR. TOR60 is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer and can be considered an alternative to TAM as first-line treatment for such patients.

Background: Exemestane (E) is a steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) with an established role in early breast cancer after 2–3 years of tamoxifen (T). Additionally, AIs have shown superiority to T as initial adjuvant therapy. The Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) study has been prospectively designed to compare the role of E as initial adjuvant therapy with a sequential approach of T followed by E (T→E).Methods: Postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive early breast cancer were randomized to open-label E 25 mg/d or T 20 mg/d. All patients completed surgery and chemotherapy, if indicated. Data were collected and analyzed by the Central Data Center in Leiden, The Netherlands. The trial was initiated in 2001 with the primary objective being a comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) with T vs E. In 2004, TEAM was modified in response to new data; all those initially receiving T were switched to E after 2.5–3 years. An additional 2500 patients were recruited and randomized at diagnosis to E or T→E for 5 years. The modified study design includes 2 coprimary endpoints: (1) DFS of T vs E that was previously reported at 2.75 years median follow-up (Jones S et al, abstract #15 presented at SABCS 2008); and (2) DFS at 5 years of E vs T→E that will be the focus of results presented here.Results: Between 2001 and January 2006, 9775 women were randomized to TEAM. In total, 99% of patients were ER+ and/or PgR+, 50% were node-negative, 44% underwent mastectomy, 68% received radiotherapy, and 36% received chemotherapy. In September 2009, median follow-up will be 5.5 years and the protocol-specified 1285 overall DFS events (locoregional or distant recurrence, second breast cancers, or death without recurrence) will have occurred, allowing for analysis of the second coprimary endpoint. We will present a detailed analysis of the 5-year results from theTEAM trial, the only prospectively powered randomized trial to compare 5 years of an initial AI vs T→AI, 2 commonly received adjuvant therapies for women with hormone receptor–positive early breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 11.

No abstract

Sleep is an essential human function but its regulation is poorly understood. Identifying genetic variants associated with quality, quantity and timing of sleep will provide biological insights into the regulation of sleep and potential links with disease. Using accelerometer data from 85,670 individuals in the UK Biobank, we performed a genome-wide association study of 8 accelerometer-derived sleep traits. We identified 47 genetic associations across the sleep traits (P<5x10 -8 ) and replicated our findings in 5,819 individuals from 3 independent studies. These included 10 novel associations for sleep duration and 26 for sleep quality. Most newly identified variants were associated with a single sleep trait, but variants previously associated with restless legs syndrome were observed to be associated with multiple sleep traits. As a group, sleep quality loci were enriched for serotonin processing genes and all sleep traits were enriched for cerebellar-expressed genes. These findings provide new biological insights into sleep characteristics.

Background: The Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial is an international randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of exemestane, alone or following tamoxifen. The large number of patients already recruited offered the opportunity to explore locoregional treatment practices between countries.Methods: Patients were enrolled in Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Japan, the Netherlands, the UK and the USA. The core protocol had minor differences in eligibility criteria between countries, reflecting variations in national guidelines and practice regarding adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Forty-five patients with localized non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of unfavorable histologic type (41 patients had diffuse histiocytic, 2 had nodular mixed, and 2 had minimally nodular histiocytic lymphoma) were treated with initial chemotherapy (28 patients), including cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), or with initial CHOP followed by involved field radiotherapy (17 patients). Patients were clinically staged and found to have stage I (7 patients), stage IE (8), stage II (12), and stage IIE (18). Despite the presence of potentially adverse prognostic factors, including age older than 65 yr (11 patients), bulky disease (17), gastrointestinal involvement (9), and “B” symptoms (4), 44 of 45 patients (98%) achieved a complete response. Forty-two patients (93%) are alive with a median follow-up time of 41 mo (range 3–128 mo). Thirty-eight patients (84%) remain continuously free of disease. Neither the pretreatment clinical features nor the type of treatment significantly influenced the outcome for patients treated with initial chemotherapy. Patients who failed treatment relapsed at distant sites or in initially involved sites whether or not they received radiotherapy. Initial treatment for localized lymphomas of unfavorable histology with chemotherapy regimens of proven curative potential in advanced disease is a successful treatment strategy and obviates the need for extensive staging. The role of involved field radiotherapy following initial chemotherapy needs to be defined.