Cabergoline is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine in women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea.
The primary aim of this review has been to clarify the tumor shrinking effects of dopamine agonists on pituitary macroadenomas of different cell types. Shrinkage is most dramatic for macroprolactinomas and is due to cell size reduction. Seventy-nine percent of 271 definite macroprolactinomas were reduced in size by at least 25%, and 89% shrank to some degree. Most shrinkage occurs during the first 3 months of treatment, although in a minority shrinkage is delayed. Dopamine agonist resistance during long-term therapy is exceptional. Drug withdrawal nearly always leads to a return of hyperprolactinemia, even after several years treatment, although early tumor reexpansion is unusual. About 10% of true macroprolactinomas do not shrink with dopamine agonists; the molecular mechanisms of such resistance have yet to be determined. Alternative formulations of BC and new dopamine agonists (CV 205-502 and cabergoline) are useful for the minority of patients unable to tolerate oral BC, but do not seem to further improve overall shrinkage rates. The risks of pregnancy have probably been overstated, and BC is suitable primary treatment for women with prolactinomas of all sizes; the drug can be used safely during pregnancy in the event of clinically relevant tumor expansion. The interpretation of different degrees of hyperprolactinemia is discussed and management strategies suggested. Most patients with macroprolactinomas now avoid surgery, but drug-induced, time-dependent tumor fibrosis should be remembered if surgery is contemplated. Nonfunctioning pituitary tumors are mostly of gonadotroph cell origin and may be associated with significant disconnection hyperprolactinaemia. Seventy-six of 84 well-characterized tumors showed no tumor shrinkage during dopamine agonist therapy. Possible explanations include abnormalities of dopamine receptor number and function. Preliminary evidence suggests that dopamine agonists may restrain the growth of some functionless tumors; most of these tumors, however, can be satisfactorily debulked using transsphenoidal surgery. In contrast to macroprolactinomas, other functioning pituitary tumors (GH-, TSH-, and ACTH-secreting) rarely shrink during dopamine agonist therapy, although the number of tumors studied is small.
Dopamine agonists are the treatment of choice for the majority of patients with hyperprolactinaemic disorders. Although characterised by a relatively high incidence of adverse effects, most commonly gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and neurological, these are usually mild and transient, and can be minimised by starting with a low dose and gradually increasing it, or taking the drug with food or while recumbent. Bromocriptine, introduced in 1971, is the reference preparation against which newer dopamine agonists are compared. It is effective in suppressing prolactin secretion, reducing prolactinoma size and restoring gonadal function. However, up to 12% of patients cannot tolerate the drug at therapeutic dosages. Cabergoline, a long-acting dopamine agonist administered once or twice weekly, has been shown to be significantly more effective than bromocriptine in suppressing prolactin secretion in hyperprolactinaemic patients, and is better tolerated, particularly in terms of nausea and vomiting. In suppressing physiological lactation, cabergoline is at least as effective as bromocriptine, and is associated with significantly fewer rebound symptoms and adverse effects. Quinagolide is a non-ergot dopamine agonist that is administered once daily. It has similar efficacy to bromocriptine, but is probably less effective than cabergoline in hyperprolactinaemic patients; it is not licensed for suppression of lactation. It is better tolerated than twice-daily bromocriptine, but is probably inferior to cabergoline in this regard. Neither bromocriptine, cabergoline nor quinagolide has been associated with any detrimental effect on pregnancy or fetal development. However, experience with bromocriptine is far more extensive; thus, for women requiring treatment for subfertility, this drug remains the treatment of choice in most centres, with cabergoline and quinagolide as acceptable second-line drugs in bromocriptine-intolerant patients. In hyperprolactinaemic men, hyperprolactinaemic women not wishing to become pregnant, and for suppression of physiological lactation, cabergoline is recommended as first-line treatment.
Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) gene expression was detected Invest. 1995Invest. . 95:1288Invest. -1298
Recent advances in the study of the tumor microenvironment have revealed significant interaction between tumor cells and their surrounding stroma in model systems. We have previously shown that two distinct stromal signatures derived from a macrophage (CSF1) response and a fibroblastic (DTF-like) response are present in subsets of invasive breast cancers and show a correlation with clinical outcome [1–3]. In the present study we explore whether these signatures also exist in the stroma of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We studied the signatures by both gene expression profile analysis of a publically available data set of DCIS and by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a tissue microarray of DCIS and invasive breast cancer cases. Both the gene expression and immunohistochemical data show that the macrophage response and fibroblast expression signatures are present in the stroma of subsets of DCIS cases. The incidence of the stromal signatures in DCIS is similar to the incidence in invasive breast cancer that we have previously reported. We also find that the macrophage response signature is associated with higher grade DCIS and cases which are ER and PR negative, whereas the fibroblast signature was not associated with any clinicopathologic features in DCIS. A comparison of 115 matched cases of DCIS and invasive breast cancer found a correlation between the type of stromal response in DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) within the same patient for both the macrophage response and the fibroblast stromal signatures (P = 0.03 and 0.08, respectively). This study is a first characterization of these signatures in DCIS. These signatures have significant clinicopathologic associations and tend to be conserved as the tumor progresses from DCIS to invasive breast cancer.
Hyperprolactinemia is the most common endocrine disorder of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. A prolactinoma is the most common cause of chronic hyperprolactinemia once pregnancy, primary hypothyroidism, and drugs that elevate serum prolactin levels have been excluded. Patients can present with hypogonadism, infertility, galactorrhea, osteopenia, and mass effects of the tumor. When hyperprolactinemia is confirmed, a cause for the disorder needs to be sought. This involves a careful history and examination, followed by laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging of the sella turcica. The goals of treatment are to normalize prolactin levels, restore gonadal function, and reduce the effects of chronic hyperprolactinemia. Dopamine agonists are the treatment of choice for the majority of patients. Transsphenoidal surgery is usually reserved for patients who are intolerant of or resistant to dopamine agonists or when hyperprolactinemia is caused by non-prolactin-secreting tumors compressing the pituitary stalk. Cabergoline has been shown to be more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine. However, there are more data on the safety of the latter drug during pregnancy and bromocriptine, therefore, remains the treatment of choice in hyperprolactinemic women wishing to conceive.
Background:The small heat shock protein, HspB5, is therapeutic in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Results: Eight other human sHsps, a mycobacterial sHsp, and a linear peptide from HspB5 were equally effective therapeutics. Conclusion: All of the therapeutic proteins and peptides were also molecular chaperones. Significance: Correlation between chaperone activity and therapeutic function supports data demonstrating sHsps bind inflammatory mediators in plasma.
Background:Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) is a rare complication of pregnancy, ranging from molar pregnancy to choriocarcinoma. Patients with persistent disease require treatment with chemotherapy. For the vast majority, prognosis is excellent. Occasionally, GTD is complicated by hyperthyroidism, which may require treatment. This is thought to occur due to molecular mimicry between human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and hence cross-reactivity with the TSH receptor. Hyperthyroidism usually resolves as the GTD is successfully treated and correspondingly HCG levels normalise.Methods:This paper reviews cases of GTD treated over a 5-year period at one of the three UK centres and identifies the prevalence of hyperthyroidism in this population. Four cases with clinical hyperthyroidism are discussed.Results:On review of the 196 patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated with chemotherapy in Sheffield since 2005, 14 (7%) had biochemical hyperthyroidism. Of these, four had evidence of clinical hyperthyroidism.Conclusion:Concomitant biochemical thyroid disease in patients with GTD is relatively common, and measurement of thyroid function in patients with persistent GTD is, therefore, important. The development of hyperthyroidism is largely influenced by the level of HCG and disease burden, and usually settles with treatment of the persistent GTD. However, rarely the thyroid stimulation can have potentially life-threatening consequences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.