No abstract

PURPOSE This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430 ). METHODS We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.

No abstract

Visual Abstract

Background Post-surgical hypoparathyroidism (PoSH) is often long term, with significant associated morbidity and ongoing treatment. A recent systematic review found impaired quality of life (QoL) in patients with PoSH, despite stable treatment. Most studies did not include an appropriate control arm and further studies were recommended, taking into account underlying disease and comorbidities. This study aims to compare QoL in patients with PoSH with appropriate control groups. Methods This was a cross-sectional observational study using the general quality of life SF-36 tool and a hypocalcaemia symptom score (HcSS) to assess QoL in patients with PoSH and controls (who had similar surgery but without PoSH). Participants were identified from two patient groups (the Butterfly Thyroid Cancer Trust and the Association for Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Disorders) and a single tertiary centre in the UK. Results Four hundred and thirty-nine responses (female n = 379, PoSH n = 89) were included with a median (range) age of 52 (19–92) years. Reported dates of surgery ranged from 1973 to 2019. HcSS scores showed significantly more associated symptoms in patients with PoSH than those without (p < 0.001). Although there was no overall difference in QoL between groups, patients with PoSH consistently had lower scores (p = 0.008) in the energy/fatigue subdomain of the SF-36. Conclusion Patients with PoSH reported significantly more fatigue and loss of energy compared to appropriately matched controls, but overall QoL was not significantly different. Standardised QoL measures may not be sensitive enough to highlight the impact on QoL in these patients. A disease-specific tool may be required.