In pediatric IBD patients seen at a large, urban tertiary care facility in the United States, a significant minority (13%) have not been vaccinated against HBV. Nearly one-half of all patients (and 44% of previously vaccinated patients) did not have protective anti-HBs levels. Moreover, of those previously vaccinated, a significant minority (14%) appear at risk for HBV because protective anti-HBs levels were absent and could not be elicited through booster immunization. Given the high risk for severe HBV infection in this group, efforts should be made to screen for HBV immunity at the time of IBD diagnosis. Booster immunization should be considered in patients without protective antibodies.

Exhaled breath analysis is a promising noninvasive method to detect fatty liver in children. Isoprene, acetone, trimethylamine, acetaldehyde, and pentane are novel biomarkers that may help to gain insight into pathophysiological processes leading to the development of NAFLD.

Acute rejection is a leading cause of early renal-allograft failure. The human Fc gamma receptor IIA (FcgammaRIIA) forms an essential link between the humoral branch and the effector cells of the immune system. In this study, we examined FcgammaRIIA genotypes in renal-allograft recipients (rejectors) with acute graft rejection and in a number of control groups to investigate a possible association between FcgammaRIIA polymorphism and acute renal-allograft rejection. The distribution of the genotypes in the study patient group differed from the control groups. The frequency of homozygosity for FcagammaRIIA-R/R131 in the rejectors was significantly higher than that in the recipients (nonrejectors) with well-functioning renal allografts and in blood donors (P< 0.05). In comparison with the control groups, the rejectors displayed a higher R131 allele frequency (P< 0.05) and a lower H131 allele frequency (P< 0.05). These results reveal a significant association between FcgammaRIIA-R/R131 and acute renal-graft rejection, and it is likely that FcgammaRIIA polymorphisms could be useful markers for potential risk of rejection.

No abstract

MTX can be effective as maintenance therapy for patients with pediatric CD previously intolerant of or unresponsive to thiopurines; however, greater than one third of this cohort required escalation to antitumor necrosis factor therapy within 12 months following MTX initiation. MTX was well tolerated.

Background Premedications are commonly given to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients prior to intravenous infliximab administration. We aimed to (1) describe practice variability; and (2) determine clinician rationale for premedicating IBD patients prior to infliximab administration. Methods We developed a cross-sectional electronic survey after comprehensive literature review to assess practice variability and clinician rationale for premedication use prior to infliximab. An optional post-survey quiz assessed clinicians’ understanding of available literature. The survey was distributed through members-only NASPGHAN and Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) listservs and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) web-based discussion boards. Results 379 unique respondents with a 93.3% survey completion rate comprised 331 (87%) and 45 (12%) pediatric and adult gastroenterologists. Among numerous options for premedications, acetaminophen (66%) and diphenhydramine (64%) were most often given prior to each infliximab infusion. Only 20% did not routinely use premedications. There was heterogeneity of premedication use between gastroenterologists within the same clinical practice. Of 328 (87%) respondents who completed the knowledge assessment quiz, only 18% identified the association of diphenhydramine use with increased reaction. Conclusion There is high inter- and intra-practice variability for premedication use prior to infliximab administration. Clinician rationale for premedicating patients appears to be driven by individual preference or group practice habit. Improved knowledge of the evidence may assist in decreasing over-use of premedications, particularly diphenhydramine.

Objectives Endoscopic mucosal improvement is the gold standard for assessing treatment efficacy in clinical trials of Crohn’s disease. Current endoscopic indices are not routinely used in clinical practice. The lack of endoscopic information in large clinical registries limits their use for research. A quick, easy, and accurate method is needed for assessing mucosal improvement for clinicians in real-world practice. We developed and tested a novel simplified endoscopic mucosal assessment for Crohn’s disease (SEMA-CD). Methods We developed a 5-point scale for ranking endoscopic severity of ileum and colon based on Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s disease (SES-CD). Central readers were trained to perform SES-CD and SEMA-CD. Pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled. Video recordings of colonoscopies were de-identified and randomly assigned to blinded central readers. The SES-CD and SEMA-CD were scored for each video. The SES-CD was considered the validated standard for comparison. Correlation was assessed with Spearman rho, inter- and intrarater reliability with kappa statistics. Results Fifty-seven colonoscopies were read a total of 212 times. Correlation between SEMA-CD and SES-CD was strong (rho = 0.98, P &lt; 0.0001). Inter-rater reliability for SEMA-CD was 0.80, and intrarater reliability was 0.83. Central readers rated SEMA-CD as easier than SES-CD. Conclusion The SEMA-CD accurately and reproducibly correlates with the standard SES-CD. Central readers viewed SEMA-CD as easier than SES-CD. Use of SEMA-CD in practice should enable collecting mucosal improvement information in large populations of patients. This will improve the quality of research that can be conducted in clinical registries. External validation is needed.

No abstract