This paper considers variants of the one-dimensional bin packing (and stock cutting) problem in which both the ordering and orientation of items in a container influences the validity and quality of a solution. Two new real-world problems of this type are introduced, the first that involves the creation of wooden trapezoidal-shaped trusses for use in the roofing industry, the second that requires the cutting and scoring of rectangular pieces of cardboard in the construction of boxes. To tackle these problems, two variants of a local search-based approximation algorithm are proposed, the first that attempts to determine item ordering and orientation via simple heuristics, the second that employs more accurate but costly branch-and-bound procedures. We investigate the inevitable trade-off between speed and accuracy that occurs with these variants and highlight the circumstances under which each scheme is advantageous.
This paper reviews the current state of the literature surrounding methods for the general graph colouring problem and presents a broad comparison of six high-performance algorithms, each belonging to one of the main algorithmic schemes identified. Unlike many previous computational studies in graph colouring, a large range of both artificially generated and real-world graphs are considered, culminating in over 40,000 individual trials that have consumed more than a decade of computation time in total. The picture painted by the comparison is complex, with each method outperforming all others on at least one occasion; however, general patterns are also observed, particularly with regards to the advantages of hybridising local-search techniques with global-based operators.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.