The relative importance of CO 2 and sympathetic stimulation in the regulation of cerebral and peripheral vasculatures has not been previously studied in humans. We investigated the effect of sympathetic activation, produced by isometric handgrip (HG) exercise, on cerebral and femoral vasculatures during periods of isocapnia and hypercapnia. In 14 healthy males (28.1 ± 3.7 (mean ± S.D.) years), we measured flow velocity (V P ; transcranial Doppler ultrasound) in the middle cerebral artery during euoxic isocapnia (ISO, +1 mmHg above rest) and two levels of euoxic hypercapnia (HC5, end-tidal P CO 2 , P ET,CO 2 , = +5 mmHg above ISO; HC10, P ET,CO 2 = +10 above ISO). Each P ET,CO 2 level was maintained for 10 min using the dynamic end-tidal forcing technique, during which increases in sympathetic activity were elicited by a 2-min HG at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction. Femoral blood flow (FBF; Doppler ultrasound), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography) and mean arterial pressure (MAP; Portapres) were also measured. Hypercapnia increasedV P and FBF by 5.0 and 0.6% mmHg −1 , respectively, and MSNA by 20-220%. Isometric HG increased MSNA by 50% and MAP by 20%, with no differences between ISO, HC5 and HC10. During the ISO HG there was an increase in cerebral vascular resistance (CVR; 20 ± 11%), whileV P remained unchanged. During HC5 and HC10 HG,V P increased (13% and 14%, respectively), but CVR was unchanged. In contrast, HG-induced sympathetic stimulation increased femoral vascular resistance (FVR) during ISO, HC5 and HC10 (17-41%), while there was a general decrease in FBF below ISO. The HG-induced increases in MSNA were associated with increases in FVR in all conditions (r = 0.76-0.87), whereas increases in MSNA were associated with increases in CVR only during ISO (r = 0.91). In summary, in the absence of hypercapnia, HG exercise caused cerebral vasoconstriction, myogenically and/or neurally, which was reflected by increases in CVR and a maintainedV P . In contrast, HG increased FVR during conditions of ISO, HC5 and HC10. Therefore, the cerebral circulation is more responsive to alterations in P CO 2 , and less responsive to sympathetic stimulation than the femoral circulation.
Although it is known that the vasculatures of the brain and the forearm are sensitive to changes in arterial Pco(2), previous investigations have not made direct comparisons of the sensitivities of cerebral blood flow (CBF) (middle cerebral artery blood velocity associated with maximum frequency of Doppler shift; Vp) and brachial blood flow (BBF) to hypercapnia. We compared the sensitivities of Vp and BBF to hypercapnia in humans. On the basis of the critical importance of the brain for the survival of the organism, we hypothesized that Vp would be more sensitive than BBF to hypercapnia. Nine healthy males (30.1 +/- 5.2 yr, mean +/- SD) participated. Euoxic hypercapnia (end-tidal Po(2) = 88 Torr, end-tidal Pco(2) = 9 Torr above resting) was achieved by using the technique of dynamic end-tidal forcing. Vp was measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasound as an index of CBF, whereas BBF was measured in the brachial artery by echo Doppler. Vp and BBF were measured during two 60-min trials of hypercapnia, each trial separated by 60 min. Since no differences in the responses were found between trials, data from both trials were averaged to make comparisons between Vp and BBF. During hypercapnia, Vp and BBF increased by 34 +/- 8 and 14 +/- 8%, respectively. Vp remained elevated throughout the hypercapnic period, but BBF returned to baseline levels by 60 min. The Vp CO(2) sensitivity was greater than BBF (4 +/- 1 vs. 2 +/- 1%/Torr; P< 0.05). Our findings confirm that Vp has a greater sensitivity than BBF in response to hypercapnia and show an adaptive response of BBF that is not evident in Vp.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.