Responsible innovations in the industry gains important attention, however, a better understanding of the interaction of different components with regard to responsible innovation (RI) in the industry is still needed. Moreover, a firm acting in an open innovation regime has to approach the responsibility criteria from various stakeholders' perspectives, include internal and external stakeholders, and execute innovation in a mutually responsible way. This paper builds on the existing and emerging literature on RI in commercial contexts by providing a networked nature of RI and a set of factors that drive RI in a firm that acts in the open innovation regime. The conceptual framework proposes the analysis of a firm's inner environment (motives for implementing RI, RI practices, and internal stakeholders), outer environment (norms and external stakeholders), and the networked nature of the firm's internal and outer environment components. Such a distinction enables us to gain a better understanding of which factors play a role inside the firm and what induces the firm to implement RI activities from its outer environment. Also, it helps to better understand the networked nature of the firm and its stakeholders.
Straipsnyje pateikiama atsakingųjų inovacijų sampratų lyginamoji analizė. Atskleidžiama atsakingųjų inovacijų (angl. responsible innovation) koncepcija, besiremianti keturiomis pagrindinėmis kategorijomis, kurių kiekviena turi savo požiūrį ir vyraujančią teoriją į atsakingąsias inovacijas: kaip verslo įžvalga, kaip vertybinė orientacija, kaip interesų valdymo teorijos raiška inovaciniame procese ir kaip inovacijų valdymo procesas, grindžiamas etapiniu inovacijų valdymo modeliu ir sprendimų priėmimu jame. Lyginamosios literatūros analize bei teorinio konceptualizavimo pagrindu apibrėžiama atsakingųjų inovacijų koncepcija, kurios vadybinis pagrindas yra atvirųjų inovacijų etapinis valdymo modelis, integruojantis socialinių ir įtraukiančiųjų inovacijų ypatumus. Atsižvelgiant į atsakingų inovacijų multidisciplininį ir tarpdisciplininį diskursą, skiriami socialiniai, ekonominiai, ekologiniai ir etiniai kriterijai, kurie užtikrinami atsakingų inovacijų veikloje taikant numatymo, įtraukimo bei refleksijos principus.
The development of organizational innovation capabilities has caught the attention of innovation management researchers and practitioners, contributing to the increasingly diverse field of both innovation management and organizational studies. The development of innovative culture within an organization is listed among the core factors for innovation, sustainability and continued success within organizations. The paper integrates the issues of organizational design and leadership with the innovation culture development issues, and provides empirical evidence on the innovation culture development within the micro enterprises of the creative sector. The micro enterprises are important, but often neglected players in innovative industries, especially related to culture and creative sectors, since they are driving the growth of the sector at the initial stages. The case of micro organization is interesting in itself, as many of the organizational design elements are lacking because of the limitation of size and other resources, and has to be replaced by the organizational dynamic and networking processes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.