Norovirus is the most frequent cause of acute infectious gastroenteritis and it is difficult to control in crowded environments like hospitals and nursing homes. Transmission depends on oral intake of virus deposited in the environment by infectious subjects. Data from volunteer studies indicate that virus concentrations in stool are highly variable, but systematic studies of the time-course of shedding and its individual variation are lacking. This paper quantifies norovirus shedding in a large population of 102 subjects, including asymptomatic shedders, and uses a longitudinal model to generalize shedding patterns. Enhanced surveillance for studies of transmission of norovirus in hospital outbreaks has yielded a considerable number of faecal samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic shedders, both from patients and staff. Norovirus concentrations were determined by real-time PCR. A quantitative dynamic model was fitted to the shedding data, in a multilevel Bayesian framework, to study the time-course of shedding and its variation. The results indicate that shedding in asymptomatic subjects is similar to that in symptomatic infections, both showing considerable variation in peak levels (average 105-109 /g faeces) as well as duration of virus shedding (average 8-60 days). Patients appear to shed higher numbers of virus than staff, for slightly longer durations, but the differences are too small to be significant. Given equal shedding, the greater contribution of symptomatic cases to transmission must be caused by their higher efficiency in spreading these viruses. The results of this study will be helpful for risk studies that need to quantify the deposition of virus in the environment.

We found that symptomatic patients and HCWs were more often involved in transmission events than asymptomatic shedders. Asymptomatic HCWs rarely contributed to transmission, despite high levels of fecal virus shedding.

Nosocomial norovirus (NoV) infection is common and may lead to complications in vulnerable hospitalized patients. Understanding sources and modes of transmission of noroviruses within health care settings will support the design of evidence-based strategies for reducing introduction and further spread. We sequenced a highly variable segment of the genome to identify possible clusters in patients with and without acute gastroenteritis who were hospitalized in the period 2002-2007. Admission and sampling dates were used to separate patients with nosocomial infection from those without nosocomial infection. Epidemiological clustering retrieved 22 clusters, defined as >2 patients with nosocomial infection on the same ward within 5 days. In total, 264 patients (of 2,458 tested) were diagnosed with NoV infection, and 61% of the patient strains could be genotyped. Of those, 51% (n ‫؍‬ 82) belonged to GII.4, 34% (n ‫؍‬ 54) belonged to GII.3, and 15% (n ‫؍‬ 24) belonged to other genotypes (GI.6B, GII.17, GII.7, and GII.2). In children's wards, GII.3 strains were associated with nosocomial spread more often than other viruses were, whereas in adults this was the case for GII.4 strains. Sequence alignment recognized 11 new clusters based on identical P2 domains (4 GII.3 and 7 GII.4 clusters), involving patients in different wards. This increased the total number of recognized clusters by 50%. Five of these clusters involved at least one outpatient, providing a possible target for improvement of infection control. We concluded that the use of sequence-based typing should be considered for identifying hidden nosocomial clusters of NoV infections within health care settings.

e Noroviruses (NoVs) have emerged as the leading cause of acute viral gastroenteritis (GE) in humans. Although diagnostic facilities have greatly improved, significant underdiagnosis of NoV in hospitals may still occur, thereby increasing clinical burden and nosocomial spread. We evaluated the underdiagnosis of sporadic NoV infections in a tertiary care hospital and estimated its clinical impact. From December 2008 until July 2009, fecal samples specifically referred for bacterial but not viral examination were retrospectively tested for NoV by real-time PCR. The clinical and virological data from patients with undiagnosed NoV infection (missed patients) were evaluated and compared with those from patients with recognized NoV. During the study period, 45 patients with undiagnosed NoV were detected, whereas 50 patients were regularly diagnosed. The missed NoV cases were more frequently adults than children (80% versus 46%; P < 0.001). The viral load levels did not differ between the diagnosed and missed patients, but missed patients more frequently presented without diarrhea (20% versus 4%; P < 0.07). The newly admitted missed NoV cases with GE underwent more diagnostic imaging (24% versus 4%; P < 0.01) and tended to be hospitalized longer. When missed-NoV patients were included, the number of nosocomial clusters doubled and missed patients were index cases in 5 of the 6 clusters. These data indicate that NoV infections are frequently missed despite routine laboratory testing and demonstrate that underdiagnosis of NoV patients is associated with costly abdominal imaging and nosocomial clustering. Awareness of NoV infection in adult patients and education about the importance of viral GE should be increased. N oroviruses (NoVs) have emerged as the one of the most important pathogens causing acute gastroenteritis (GE) in children and adults (8,12). Nursing homes and hospitals are widely confronted with NoV outbreaks. Additionally, isolated (sporadic) cases of NoV frequently occur, but their incidence and clinical impact in hospitals have not been studied systematically (2, 17). Sporadic cases of NoV may result both from community-acquired infections in newly admitted patients and from nosocomial transmissions between patients, personnel, or visitors (9). Although sensitive commercial and homemade diagnostic assays for NoV have become widely available, sporadic NoV infections in hospitalized patients remain underdiagnosed, increasing the clinical burden and potential for nosocomial spread (1, 3, 21). Underrecognition of NoV may result in the individual patient undergoing more diagnostic procedures and may increase the influx of infectious patients into hospital wards, where they may trigger outbreaks (5, 14). Underdiagnosis of NoV may result from a referral bias, as well as from suboptimal laboratory facilities and inadequate specimen collection. This bias may occur when physicians selectively refer GE patients for bacteriological or parasitological testing but not virological testing. In the present study, we prosp...

We concluded that P2 domain variation increases with duration of virus shedding, but was unrelated to total amounts of virus shed. Therefore, we propose that cluster identification based on identical sequences should be relaxed to accommodate minor sequence variation. When using sequence data to support outbreak investigations, sequence diversity should be interpreted in relation to timing of sampling since onset of illness.