In each PMO population examined, denosumab represented good value for money compared with branded bisphosphonates. Furthermore, denosumab was either cost effective or dominant compared with generic alendronate in the high-risk subgroups.

Study Type – Diagnostic (cost effectiveness) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The Beckman Coulter prostate health index (phi) was developed as a combination of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), free PSA and a PSA precursor form [−2]proPSA to calculate the probability of prostate cancer and was used as an aid in distinguishing prostate cancer from benign prostatic conditions for men with PSA test 2–10 ng/mL and non‐suspicious digital rectal examination. Phi has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection compared with total and free PSA. An earlier 1‐year budget impact analysis revealed it to be a complementary approach to current prostate cancer screening strategies. The current study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of early prostate cancer detection with phi in combination with a PSA test compared with a PSA test alone from the US societal perspective. The model with over 25 annual screening cycles for men aged 50–75 years indicated that PSA plus phi dominated the PSA test alone in prostate cancer detection and consequent treatment. PSA plus phi may be an important strategy for prostate cancer detection. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of early prostate cancer detection with the Beckman Coulter Prostate Health Index (phi) (not currently available in the USA) adding to the serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) test compared with the PSA test alone from the US societal perspective. PATIENTS AND METHODS Phi was developed as a combination of PSA, free PSA, and a PSA precursor form [−2]proPSA to calculate the probability of prostate cancer and was used as an aid in distinguishing prostate cancer from benign prostatic conditions for men with a borderline PSA test (e.g. PSA 2–10 ng/mL or 4–10 ng/mL) and non‐suspicious digital rectal examination. We constructed a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis to estimate expected costs and utilities of prostate cancer detection and consequent treatment for the annual prostate cancer screening in the male population aged 50–75 years old. The transition probabilities, health state utilities and prostate cancer treatment costs were derived from the published literature. The diagnostic performance of phi was obtained from a multi‐centre study. Diagnostic related costs were obtained from the 2009 Medicare Fee Schedule. Cost‐effectiveness was compared between the strategies of PSA test alone and PSA plus phi under two PSA thresholds (≥2 ng/mL and ≥4 ng/mL) to recommend a prostate biopsy. RESULTS Over 25 annual screening cycles, the strategy of PSA plus phi dominated the PSA‐only strategy using both thresholds of PSA ≥2 ng/mL and PSA ≥4 ng/mL, and was estimated to save $1199 or $443, with an expected gain of 0.08 or 0.03 quality adjusted life years, respectively. The probabilities of PSA plus phi being cost effective were approximately 77–70% or 78–71% at a range of $0–$200 000 willingness to pay using PSA thresholds ≥2 ng/mL and ≥4 ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION The strat...

BackgroundThere is limited understanding of the health economic implications of cervical screening with human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 genotyping.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of cervical cancer primary screening with a HPV-16/18 genotyping test which simultaneously detects 12 other high-risk HPV types.MethodsA Markov cohort model compared four strategies: (1) cytology with reflex HPV testing for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US); (2) co-testing with cytology and HPV testing; (3) HPV with reflex to cytology; and (4) HPV with 16/18 genotyping and reflex cytology (ASC-US threshold). Screening began at age 30 and was performed triennially over 40 years. Screening sensitivity and specificity values for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 were obtained from the Addressing THE Need for Advanced HPV Diagnostics (ATHENA) trial. Outcomes for a 1-year follow-up scenario wherein persistent disease was detected were estimated. Screening and cancer treatment costs were calculated from a US payer’s perspective in 2013. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at 3 % annually.ResultsApplying a US$50,000/QALY threshold, strategy (4) dominated strategies (2) and (3) by reducing costs and cancer incidence and improving QALYs, and was cost effective versus strategy (1). Accounting for persistent ≥CIN 3 at 1 year, strategy (4) was cost effective versus all other strategies. Detecting HPV-16/18 resulted in earlier diagnosis of clinically relevant ≥CIN 3 at initial screening and efficient use of follow-up resources. Outcomes were most influenced by strategy performance.ConclusionsIncorporating HPV-16/18 genotyping is cost effective and may improve detection of CIN, thereby preventing cervical cancer.

Participants preferred denosumab to alendronate while on treatment and had more positive perceptions of denosumab than alendronate. These perceptions were associated with better adherence.