No abstract

OBJECTIVE Quadrigeminal cistern arachnoid cysts (QACs) are congenital lesions that can cause pineal region compression and obstructive hydrocephalus when sufficiently large. Management of these cysts is controversial and rates of reintervention are high. Given the limited data on the management of QACs, the authors retrospectively reviewed 20 years of cases managed at their institution and performed a literature review on this topic. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated for QAC at their institution between 2001 and 2021. They also performed a literature review of studies published between 1980 and 2021 that reported at least 5 patients treated for QACs. Patient characteristics, radiographic findings, management course, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 12 patients treated for a QAC at the authors’ institution met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Median age was 9 months, mean cyst size was 5.1 cm, and 83% of patients had hydrocephalus. Initial treatment was endoscopic fenestration in 92% of these patients, 27% of whom had an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) performed concurrently. Reintervention was required in 42% of patients. Cases that required reintervention had a statistically significant lower median age at the initial intervention (5 months) than the cases that did not require reintervention (24.33 months; p = 0.018). There were no major complications. At a mean follow-up of 5.42 years, 83% of patients had improvement or resolution of their symptoms. A literature review revealed 7 studies that met the inclusion criteria, totaling 108 patients with a mean age of 8.8 years. Eighty-seven percent of patients had hydrocephalus at presentation. Ninety-two percent of patients were initially treated with endoscopic fenestration, 44% of whom underwent concurrent ETV. Complications occurred in 17.6% of cases, and reintervention was required in 30.6% of cases. The most frequent reason for reintervention was untreated or unresolved hydrocephalus after the initial procedure. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic fenestration is the most common treatment for QACs. While generally safe and effective, there is a high rate of reintervention after initial treatment of QACs, which may be associated with a younger age at the first intervention. Additionally, identifying patients who require initial treatment of hydrocephalus is critically important, as the literature suggests that untreated hydrocephalus is a common cause of reintervention.

No abstract

No abstract

Background As nonsurgical rejuvenation with fillers continues to grow in popularity, patients are increasingly interested in more durable results. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-collagen gel is unique among fillers in that the PMMA microspheres are not completely absorbed and phagocytosed by the body. This durability coupled with the biophysical properties of PMMA makes it a poor choice for periorbital rejuvenation, an unforgiving and highly complex anatomic area. Methods Between 2011 and 2018, 14 patients with PMMA granulomas in various facial areas self-referred to the senior author's practice. Of these patients, 11 were managed nonsurgically; however, all 3 patients who presented with granulomas in the infraorbital area required surgery to remove the filler and restore a natural aesthetic. Results The 3 patients with significant swelling and PMMA filler nodules in the infraorbital area with unacceptable cosmetic appearance were females between the ages of 50 and 55 years. Nonsurgical protocols were unsuccessful, and surgical removal was required. All subjects have been followed for a minimum of 2 years with no immediate- or long-term postoperative complications secondary to PMMA removal. Patients remain satisfied with the outcome of the surgery. Conclusions Despite the evidence that the periorbital area is prone to adverse events when injected with particulate fillers, misguided enthusiasm for PMMA-collagen gel as a durable treatment continues to lead to unnecessary and severe complications in patients. The case studies presented here highlight that this product should not be introduced into the periorbital area. We also describe a surgical treatment approach for its removal if complications arise.