BackgroundSevere refractory asthma is a heterogeneous disease. We sought to determine statistical clusters from the British Thoracic Society Severe refractory Asthma Registry and to examine cluster-specific outcomes and stability.MethodsFactor analysis and statistical cluster modelling was undertaken to determine the number of clusters and their membership (N = 349). Cluster-specific outcomes were assessed after a median follow-up of 3 years. A classifier was programmed to determine cluster stability and was validated in an independent cohort of new patients recruited to the registry (n = 245).FindingsFive clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (34%) were atopic with early onset disease, cluster 2 (21%) were obese with late onset disease, cluster 3 (15%) had the least severe disease, cluster 4 (15%) were the eosinophilic with late onset disease and cluster 5 (15%) had significant fixed airflow obstruction. At follow-up, the proportion of subjects treated with oral corticosteroids increased in all groups with an increase in body mass index. Exacerbation frequency decreased significantly in clusters 1, 2 and 4 and was associated with a significant fall in the peripheral blood eosinophil count in clusters 2 and 4. Stability of cluster membership at follow-up was 52% for the whole group with stability being best in cluster 2 (71%) and worst in cluster 4 (25%). In an independent validation cohort, the classifier identified the same 5 clusters with similar patient distribution and characteristics.InterpretationStatistical cluster analysis can identify distinct phenotypes with specific outcomes. Cluster membership can be determined using a classifier, but when treatment is optimised, cluster stability is poor.

Whole blood glutathione synthesis rates are decreased, by about 60%, in critically ill septic children receiving limited nutritional support. Plasma cysteine fluxes and concentration of cysteine were increased in the septic patients, suggesting a hypermetabolic state with increased protein breakdown. The mechanisms whereby GSH synthesis rates are decreased in these patients are probably multifactorial, presumably involving an inflammatory response in the presence of limited nutritional support. The role of nutritional modulation and the use of cysteine prodrugs in maintaining GSH concentration and synthesis remain to be established.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract