Background: Anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) is an early treatment option for progressive scoliosis in pediatric patients, allowing for continued deformity correction during normal growth. We report postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes for patients treated with VBT. Methods: This clinical and radiographic retrospective review of 31 consecutive patients included an analysis of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative details, including the Lenke classification; Cobb angle measurements of the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and lumbar curves; the sagittal profile; and skeletal maturity. Successful outcomes were defined by a residual curve of ≤30° in skeletally mature patients who did not undergo a posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Results: Of the 31 patients treated, 29 met the inclusion criteria, and 2 were lost to follow-up. The mean patient age (and standard deviation) at the time of the surgical procedure was 12.7 ± 1.5 years (range, 10.2 to 16.7 years), with most patients classified as Risser grade 0 or 1 (52%) and Sanders stage 3 (32%). A mean of 7.2 ± 1.4 vertebral levels were instrumented, with a minimum preoperative Cobb angle of 42°. At the latest follow-up, 27 patients had reached skeletal maturity (Sanders stage ≥7) and 20 patients exhibited a curve magnitude ≤30°, for a success rate of 74%. A suspected broken tether occurred at ≥1 level in 14 patients (48%). Two patients underwent PSF and 4 had tether revision. The overall revision rate was 21% (6 of 29). Conclusions: This study shows the success and revision rates as well as the impact of a suspected broken tether on the procedural success of VBT. Despite our patient population being slightly more mature at the time of the surgical procedure compared with previous studies, we had a higher success rate and a lower revision rate. A PSF was avoided in 93% of patients, indicating that VBT may be a reliable treatment option for adolescent scoliosis in skeletally immature individuals. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine incidence of concurrent peroneal nerve injury and to compare outcomes in patients with and without peroneal nerve injury after surgical treatment for multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs). A retrospective study of 357 MLKIs was conducted. Patients with two or more knee ligaments requiring surgical reconstruction were included. Mean follow-up was 35 months (0-117). Incidence of concurrent peroneal nerve injury was noted and patients with and without nerve injury were evaluated for outcomes. Concurrent peroneal nerve injury occurred in 68 patients (19%). In patients with nerve injury, 45 (73%) returned to full duty at work; 193 (81%) patients without nerve injury returned to full duty ( = 0.06). In patients with nerve injury, 37 (60%) returned to their previous level of activity; 148 (62%) patients without nerve injury returned to their previous level of activity ( = 0.41). At final follow-up, there were no significant differences in level of pain (mean visual analog scale 1.6 vs. 2; = 0.17), Lysholm score (mean 88.6 vs. 88.8; = 0.94), or International Knee Documentation Committee score (mean 46.2 vs. 47.8; = 0.67) for patients with or without peroneal nerve injury, respectively. Postoperative range of motion (ROM) (mean 121 degrees) was significantly lower ( = 0.02) for patients with nerve injury compared with patients without nerve injury (mean 127 degrees). Concurrent peroneal nerve injury occurred in 19% of patients in this large cohort suffering MLKIs. After knee reconstruction surgery, patients with concurrent peroneal nerve injuries had significantly lower knee ROM and trended toward a lower rate of return to work. However, outcomes with respect to activity level, pain, and function were not significantly different between the two groups. This study contributes to our understanding of patient outcomes in patients with concurrent MLKI and peroneal nerve injury, with a focus on the patient's ability to return to work and sporting activity.

Tibial plateau fractures account for approximately 8% of fractures in the elderly population. Treatment strategies in the elderly are similar to those for younger patients; however, practitioners must account for the elevated comorbidity burden in this population. To date, few studies have analyzed age-based outcomes in patients with tibial plateau fractures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine age-related variances in demographics, fracture characteristics, mechanism of injury, and complications. A 10-year retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who received treatment for a tibial plateau fracture. There were 351 patients (360 tibial plateau fractures) who were identified and subsequently stratified according to their age at the time of injury. Patients were classified as elderly if they were 65 years of age or older at the time of injury; all other patients were included in the control cohort. These two cohorts were analyzed using bivariate analysis to isolate for age-related variations with respect to risk factors, mechanism of injury, and complications. There were 351 patients (360 tibial plateau fractures) with a median follow-up of 1.84 ± 2.44 years who met inclusion criteria. There were a greater proportion of women in the elderly cohort as compared with the younger cohort (60.0 vs. 43.4%, p = 0.06). Elderly patients were significantly more likely to present with diabetes (33.3 vs. 16.1%, p = 0.01) or osteoporosis (14.3 vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001). Younger patients were significantly more likely to require further surgery to address ligament (12.6 vs. 0%, p = 0.008), meniscus (20.9 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.036), or cartilage pathology (13.6 vs. 0%, p = 0.005). There was no difference in the arthroplasty conversion rate (4.8% elderly vs. 7.9% control, p = 0.755). While elderly patients presented with a greater comorbidity burden, they had equivalent or better short-term outcomes when compared with their younger peers when treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Despite the recent interest in primary total knee arthroplasty for elderly patients with tibial plateau fractures, the results of this study suggest that elderly patients may respond well when treated with ORIF following a tibial plateau fracture.