Interactions between coot (Fulica atra) and submerged macrophytes: the role of birds in the restoration process. Perrow, M.R.; Schutten, J.; Howes, J.R.; Holzer, T.; Madgewick, F.J.; Jowitt, A.J.D.
Published in: Hydrobiologia
Link to publicationCitation for published version (APA): Perrow, M. R., Schutten, J., Howes, J. R., Holzer, T., Madgewick, F. J., & Jowitt, A. J. D. (1997). Interactions between coot (Fulica atra) and submerged macrophytes: the role of birds in the restoration process. Hydrobiologia, 242/243, 241-255.
General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
AbstractGrazing by herbivorous birds is often cited as an important factor in suppressing macrophyte development in shallow lakes undergoing restoration, thus delaying the attainment of the stable clear water state. Development and succession of macrophyte communities and size, diet and grazing pressure of coot (Fulica atra) populations upon macrophytes, were monitored over the seasonal cycle at ten shallow lakes of varying nutrient status, in the Norfolk Broads in eastern England. In spring, territorial breeding birds were at relatively low density and included only a small proportion of macrophytes in their diet, resulting in low grazing pressure on macrophytes. In summer, there was a significant relationship between macrophyte cover and bird density, illustrating the importance of macrophytes in the dispersion phase for birds following breeding. Macrophytes comprised the bulk of bird diet where they were available and the consumption of macrophytes was up to 76 fold higher than in spring. However, losses to grazing in both periods were negligible when compared to potential growth rates documented in the literature. Grazing experiments at two biomanipulated lakes confirmed that birds were not responsible for limiting macrophytes during the spring colonisation phase or in the summer growth period. During the period of autumnal senescence and over the winter months where some macrophyte species remain available, e.g. as developed individuals or dormant buds, grazing by birds may conceivably have an impact on the development and structure of macrophyte populations in subsequent growing seasons.The relative importance of bird grazing compared to other factors limiting the development of macrophytes...
