A retrospective review of chest radiographs from 205 patients with blunt chest trauma who also underwent aortography was performed. Forty-one of the 205 had aortographically proved aortic rupture. Discriminant analysis of 16 radiographic signs indicated that the most discriminating signs were loss of the aorticopulmonary window, abnormality of the aortic arch, rightward tracheal shift, and widening of the left paraspinal line without associated fracture. No single or combination of radiographic signs demonstrated sufficient sensitivity to indicate all cases of traumatic aortic rupture on plain chest radiographs without the performance of a large number of aortographically negative studies. The bedside anteroposterior "erect" view of the chest proved far more valuable than the supine view in detecting true-negative studies. Despite significant reader variability in the interpretation of the various radiographic signs, in general the analysis confirmed the role of chest radiography in this clinical situation, but suggests that its most beneficial use is in excluding the diagnosis and eliminating unwarranted aortography rather than in predicting aortic rupture.
Radiographic measurements of the cardiothoracic ratio in four adult victims of blunt thoracic trauma with pneumopericardium demonstrated a sudden, substantial decrease in the size of the cardiac silhouette, which was accompanied by pathophysiologic effects of cardiac tamponade. The sudden decrease in cardiac size could not be attributed to a decrease in intravascular volume or to changes in positive airway pressure. Following surgical relief of tension pneumopericardium, the cardiac size was restored to baseline dimensions and the hemodynamic effects of tamponade resolved. In the presence of pneumopericardium, the "small heart" sign may alert one to the presence of tension pneumopericardium and impending cardiac tamponade.
The American College of Surgery currently recommends routine performance of lateral cervical radiography of C-1 to C-7 for all patients admitted with a history of major blunt trauma. A survey of 125 North American hospitals with experience in acute trauma care revealed that 96% obtain cervical radiographs as a routine or protocol study on all patients who have suffered major blunt trauma. To ascertain the cost-benefit effect of this practice, a prospective study was conducted during a 19-month period to compare the results of admission bedside clinical assessment of the cervical spine and the outcome of cervical radiography and computed tomography (CT) performed on 408 patients admitted with a history of major blunt trauma. Among these patients, there were 138 (34%) who were judged to be mentally alert and without symptoms referable to cervical spine injury. CT was performed after cervical radiography to adequately visualize the lower cervical spine (132 patients) or to clarify uncertain radiographic findings (six patients). One nondisplaced transverse process fracture of C-7 was detected (a prevalence of less than 1% of asymptomatic patients). The combined cost of cervical radiography and CT for the 138 asymptomatic patients was $59,202. These results call into question both the cost and clinical efficacy of routine or protocol-driven cervical spine imaging for all patients who have sustained major blunt trauma and support the value of careful bedside clinical assessment of the cervical spine in mentally alert blunt-trauma victims.
Esophageal hematoma secondary to thrombocytopenia has only recently been described in the literature in a single case report. This article presents the clinical manifestations and radiographic findings of 4 additional cases of esophageal hematoma secondary to thrombocytopenia. Three patients were receiving treatment for leukemia, and the other patient had aplastic anemia. Previously reported cases of esophageal hematomas from other causes are reviewed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.